What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Growing pains: Rate of young men struggling...
- BYU student killed after falling 70 feet in...
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- Charges: Runaway teen caused accident that...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
34 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
25 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
15 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Poll shows Utahns think Legislature's...
14 - Man shot brother while showing him...
13 - Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches
12






Duh. (Sorry, but did we spend taxpayer money for this study of the obvious?)
Masters of the Obvious
ditto
It is conceivable that cellular network providers could disable text functionality while moving. The provider could monitor the "pass off" rate from one cellular receiver to the next to determine how fast a person is changing location and disable text functions accordingly. Sure, it would also disable text function for car passengers as well as public transportation users, but this is a small price to pay to stop this wanton abuse of technology. Don't expect providers to do this, however, since it will result in a decrease in their revenue. This method could only be implemented through federal legislation/directives. Possibly, lawsuits brought against the network providers by innocent victims of this act could spur movement towards a solution. Technology inadvertently created this problem and providers profit from the technology. They can both be used to solve this problem. Morally, it is the right thing to do.
This is just one more area where government is trying to take away personal liberty. If the government bans texting while driving they will also need to increase funding for enforcement and judicial proceedings. My taxes will then need to be raised to pay for it.
I say let the free market decide! If people are worried about getting into an accident because of other people texting, let them stay home!
Socialists!!
The elephant in the room is that texting while driving is obviously--and now, quantifiably--much more dangerous than many low-level DUI drivers are, but we continue to wink at texters while throwing the book at drinkers.
Let's have some equal justice here, one way or the other!
Hang up and drive... before you kill someone !
RE: Glenn Beck
By your same reasoning it should be legal for me to have a beer while I'm driving, or be completely hammered.
If you're worried about being hit by a drunk driver you should stay at home.
Brilliant reasoning there mr. beck.
Oh, and they say texting while driving is MORE dangerous than being drunk.
"Utah law already bans texting while driving"
Texting is only banned on Utah highways...FYI.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments