Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Jay Evensen: On second thought...
- Readers' forum: No nuclear waste in Utah
- In our opinion: New nuclear plants...
- Readers' forum: Price of freedom
- Robert Bennett: A brokered...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Michael Gerson: Egypt's craziness is...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
In Opinion
Across Site
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- Robert Bennett: A brokered...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- In our opinion: New nuclear plants...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Readers' forum: Price of freedom
In Opinion
Across Site
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
54 - Letters: Bush's failed policies
52 - Letters: A changing Constitution
39 - Editorial: Rights of conscience
33 - Letters: Teachers not overpaid
30 - Letters: Home equity loans
28 - Letters: Rights of conscience
26 - The Gospel according to Obama
26 - GOP no longer leads on defense
24 - Letter: Taxing our children
22












But don't blame the scientists for the politicians' actions. Scientists who are publishing their findings in reputable, peer-reviewed scientific journals are not simply pushing a political agenda, nor are they manipulating the facts in order to keep their jobs. They're doing rigorous research, writing honestly about what they find, and subjecting that writing to serious scrutiny. The process is the same for the folks whose findings support theories of climate change as for those whose findings cast doubt on those theories (and both camps are publishing).
Just as in any other profession or beliefs if you will, there are those who are out for themselves. Scientist just like any other person can have ambitions for fame and notoriety, rich’s and political pressure the same as some big wig on wall street.
Just a couple of examples are what all the scientist said to prove that Jews were a inferior race in Hitler’s Germany so that he could get the people on his side of that issue.
Today scientist love their computer models. Why? Because they can get their models to say anything they want when the put the #’s in just right. Sometimes for us laymen it is hard to understand who really is on the right track and who is up in the night. Especially now with the debate of global warming. This is one of those issues that is very much foiled by politics and money. Al Gore has gotten himself a lot of money with it.
Reality is staring you in the face and you're closing your eyes, plugging your ears and shouting "La la la la la I can't hear you!" to avoid dealing with your own ignorance.
What a crock.
Lets return to the days of stripping forests, over fishing, open pit mines, offshore drilling, strip mining, etc.
Oh wait, we are still doing that.
Now what is your problem?
Technology developed from scientific investigation has been pretty successful for the last 24 years.
What do you recommend for establishing policy upon? Myth? (forcing creationism in schools over evolution) Gut feeling? (barring sex ed in schools) Doctored intelligence? (Iraq)... I'm sorry, but the track record of non-science based "knowledge" is not good.
Sad, you missed that beautiful lesson.
They were right, we've been wrong.
Peace