Reader comments
Better off out of Senate?
11 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Jay Evensen: On second thought...
- Readers' forum: No nuclear waste in Utah
- In our opinion: New nuclear plants...
- Readers' forum: Price of freedom
- Robert Bennett: A brokered...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Michael Gerson: Egypt's craziness is...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
In Opinion
Across Site
- Robert Bennett: A brokered...
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- In our opinion: New nuclear plants...
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- Readers' forum: Price of freedom
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Readers' forum: No nuclear waste in Utah
In Opinion
Across Site
- Letters: Bush's failed policies
53 - Letters: A changing Constitution
45 - Editorial: Rights of conscience
40 - Letters: Teachers not overpaid
32 - Editorial: New nuclear plants
31 - Letters: Home equity loans
28 - The Gospel according to Obama
27 - Letters: Rights of conscience
26 - GOP no longer leads on defense
24 - Tear down the wall of discrimination
21












Don't let the door hit you in the backside. If you can't abide by the standards, it's time to get out.
As I recall the article in which Senator Hillyard is quoted, he said that the proposed ethical standards for legislators would require that his firm open its records, including confidential client records, to outsiders.
Such a requirement would place Mr. Hillyard -- and any other legislator who is a lawyer -- in an untenable position, requiring either resignation from the legislature or cessation of the practice of law. This is because legal rules of ethics require lawyers to keep many records about their dealings with clients strictly confidential.
That was the point the Senator -- and the newspaper article in which he was quoted -- was making.
"Mr. England's letter misses the Senator's point."
You missed England's point which is that if there is a conflict than a legislator must choose between what he was elected to do and his own private interests or the interests of those he works for.
"Such a requirement would place Mr. Hillyard -- and any other legislator who is a lawyer -- in an untenable position, requiring either resignation from the legislature or cessation of the practice of law."
If there is a conflict between his law practice and his duties as a legislator then he should either be forced to resign from the legislature or from a law firm but he shouldn't attempt to hide conflicts that he has representing a client that has interests that involve legislation.
"This is because legal rules of ethics require lawyers to keep many records about their dealings with clients strictly confidential."
Legislative rules of ethics require that legislators not hide conflicts of interests regardless of rather their job is that of a dog catcher or lawyer. We are well aware that he believes this but it shows that we are better off.
Sad though.
Then we could dispense with elections and just appoint the few that were not already eliminated. Of course they would not the best and brightest among us, just those who had never done anything.
There is no list of professions who are unqualified for public service, as long as it is legal, nor should there be.