Reader comments
Review: 'SuperFreakonomics' as fun as predecessor

4 comments   |   Read story

The first book was also.... | 2:16 p.m. Nov. 8, 2009
...politically slanted and opinionated. For instance, they somehow came to the conclusion that the Democratic party would face difficulties in elections, due to abortion. (Somehow, irregardless that the information is NOT available, they determined that only Democrats would get abortions, thus meaning that fewer children would grow up Demoratic, and therefore the Republicans would gain more and more power).

Their books are clever, but they really fail to prove their point in most cases.

And in the case they're trying to make against global warming, they've brought out extreme viewpoints to make their case against science.

irondori | 3:43 p.m. Nov. 8, 2009
Hopefully book two has avoided the post hoc ergo hoc and circular reasoning that plagued book one. The authors consistently confuse correlation with causation. That's fine for the mass market I guess, but not for really smart, good looking people like me.
Entertainment, not science | 5:40 a.m. Nov. 9, 2009
Let's face it, the books are meant to be entertainment, not factual or scientific information to base policy upon. No true academic would ever cite the book in a peer-reviewed article.
Comments continue below
Flawed Premise | 10:11 a.m. Nov. 9, 2009
I agree with Irondori. Anyone who has formally studied both economics and statistics would know that correlation does not equal causation. The author’s first book was a stunning example of that, reaching flawed conclusions without even attempting to understand other reasons, or vaguely dismissing them with the equivalent of a "We just don't think that is possible" response. These books are easy-reading, trite studies without any substance.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Image
Charles Rex Arbogast, Associated Press

In an April 19, 2005 file photo, University of Chicago economics professor Steven Levitt poses with his book, "Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything," in Chicago. Levitt and co-author Stephen J. Dubner have released a follow-up book, "SuperFreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance".

previousnext

Latest comments

@aurum79, Liberalism is a mental disorder! How else can one describe what...

Union thugs and government thieves. Obama's Government Motors has sent...

Semms I remmmeberBoozer have big games against the laker in the playoofs,...

The only thing BYU did well at all last year against Utah was run the ball....

I am a conservative and happen to be LDS. But, I pray that Beck does not go...

Does anyone know why that touchdown was called back?

Anybody want to refute what Beck actually says or will you simply continue to...

Glenn Beck to enter politics?

The majority do want lower taxes and much less government intrusion. Now who...

Letters: Say heck, not gosh

Flip, what a excellent, fechin, heck of a idea. See ya elder in...

I find it beyond amusing that a liberal will accuse a conservative of "hate"...

Advertisements