Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Jay Evensen: On second thought...
- Readers' forum: No nuclear waste in Utah
- In our opinion: New nuclear plants...
- Readers' forum: Price of freedom
- Robert Bennett: A brokered...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Michael Gerson: Egypt's craziness is...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
In Opinion
Across Site
- Robert Bennett: A brokered...
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- In our opinion: New nuclear plants...
- Readers' forum: Price of freedom
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Readers' forum: No nuclear waste in Utah
In Opinion
Across Site
- Letters: Bush's failed policies
53 - Letters: A changing Constitution
44 - Editorial: Rights of conscience
40 - Letters: Teachers not overpaid
32 - Editorial: New nuclear plants
30 - Letters: Home equity loans
28 - The Gospel according to Obama
27 - Letters: Rights of conscience
26 - GOP no longer leads on defense
24 - Letter: Taxing our children
22












If some women make less than men in the same job, it is the result of choices that many women make, not some mythical maniacal conspiracy amongst men to pay women less money.
Society does not blame victims of rape and sexual assault for the crimes committed against them. That is a lie. The criminal is always to blame. However, if a man runs around in a dark alley waving money around, and then gets mugged, only fools are surprised.
Women are not underrepresented, brushed to the side, or ignored from business, politics or any other aspects of American society. What an absurdity. When a woman runs for office, she has as much chance of being elected as any man.
Feminism is not the struggle for women’s rights. I support a woman’s rights to fair and equal treatment. I do not support extreme and selfish philosophies like feminism that demean stay-at-home moms, assign one acceptable lifestyle for women, and viscously demonize men.
It seems though that some feminism is about some women not wearing makeup or wearing clothes that make them look good or acting in ways that are not very feminine.
I've never understood this, how does this type of feminism help the life of those women who choose to look not as nice as they could or act in feminine ways?
Female clergy not allowed.
Female Bishops not allowed.
Of COURSE we need feminism.
_________________
A fair way to deal with the fact that women might not stay in a job long enough to justify training is to pay according to how long a person stays in the job. But pay people equally male and female.
I think, though, that in the job market wages are settled by supply and demand. If you don't negotiate well you may not get as much as another person. I'm male but some men are tougher negotiators than I am so end up being paid better, sometimes undeservedly.
It's a rough and ready way to decide wages and salaries but it's better, I think, than a complicated system presided over by a bureaucrat, that cannot prevent, or even creates new, inequities.
An employer may not value a person so much if he thinks that person will be taking time off when children are sick, will not work overtime when needed and so on.
Employers often make decisions like insurance companies - by profiling, gender, age, ethnic etc. Since an employer doesn't really know who is the best person for the job that employer will make generalisations, such as a woman will more likely quit on me, take unsheduled time off. A man with a chequered work history - the same. Less experience - same. Old person will get sick etc.
That certainly sounds as if you are blaming the women for being raped. It reads as if, in your opinion, women who are raped are "flaunting" it or "asking for it" and should not be surprised when someone takes them up on it. Do you really think that merely being a woman is the same as waving money around in a dark alley? If a man has so little control of himself that a woman being a woman is grounds to rape her, that is the man's problem - a woman should not have to dress to protect herself from the lowest common denominator.
I detract however. I like a lot of what you say. The only point of difference that I feel strongly about is that, as a male, I no longer get excited about a woman painting her entire head, fingernails, toenails etc. It increasingly seems insane or at least primitive. It seems to wrinkle women's skin over time, and it's a bit odd.
A woman is still a woman if she stays the color God intended. I'll be a "chauvinist" in many people's eyes though: I like a woman to dress in a distinctive feminine style, not in imitation of men: shirt, pants, sneakers. I like distinctive female hair styles too, not extremely short or bald.
Same with men - don't like to see men with long silky hair.
Lilly Ledbetter.
The sanctimonious shock at Rep. Joe Wilson's (R-SC) calling out "You lie" when Barack Obama said the health care bill will not insure illegal aliens reminds me of the Casablanca police chief saying he was "shocked, shocked" to learn that gambling was taking place in the saloon. Barack Obama's congressional pals had defeated the Republican amendment to require proof of legal residency in order to be covered by the health care bill, and the American people know that illegals are now getting free health care at emergency rooms.
The surprise was that nobody cried "You lie" when Obama said "Under our plan no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions." Anyone who follows this issue knows that all Democratic sponsored bills cover abortion funding, and that the Hyde Amendment will not apply to the health care bill because it only prohibits federal taxpayer funding of abortions financed through Medicaid.
Obama promised Planned Parenthood that "In my mind, reproductive care is essential care." Planned Parenthood got their feminist killing babies act.
Radical Feminism went out & died in 1995, when The Family was brought forth again. Why dwell on it now?.
Are you God's spokesperson? How do you know he wouldn't support feminism. I have a hard time believing God wouldn't support equal pay.
You can start your own Church and give all the matriarchal bleesing you want - no one is stopping you!
What we need is for society to follow the gospel of Jesus Christ. In the gospel, we are all equal and retain and celebrate masculine and feminine qualities. No one is harmed and people earn was they work for.
Disgusting and way self-serving and promoting.