Reader comments
Sportscaster must pay ex-wife $916,000 a year

11 comments | Read story

Selfishness !! | 12:09 p.m. Nov. 3, 2009

Selfishness on BOTH their parts, I'm sure.

Anonymous | 12:12 p.m. Nov. 3, 2009

Wow 72k a month!

Anonymous | 12:16 p.m. Nov. 3, 2009

The judge said neither party was "at fault". How about a reality check.....both parties are at fault.

Comments continue below

OUCH | 12:22 p.m. Nov. 3, 2009

All that going to the EX and still enough coin to rake in a twenty-something.

YOU GO JIMMY!

Always | 12:23 p.m. Nov. 3, 2009

The splits don't seem to vary much. There is always another young woman in the picture.

divorced | 1:05 p.m. Nov. 3, 2009

those who haven't been through a similar situation don't understand, so you might want to think before you post

Steve | 1:45 p.m. Nov. 3, 2009

Just another example of the disposable family. 26 years, a 15 year old daughter and throw it away because "well what about what I want?" I guess "til death do you part" should be replaced by "until you lose interest" or "until something better comes along". God Bless America! We need it.

Nice | 2:06 p.m. Nov. 3, 2009

I just want what's best for my daughter, and oh by the way - I need $70K towards a country club each year. Selfishness and greed are ugly at best.

fooling around is expensive | 2:25 p.m. Nov. 3, 2009

the monetary cost of fooling around. Pay up Nance.

cardster | 3:08 p.m. Nov. 3, 2009

Not bad earnings for an ex-KSLTVer who wasn't even among the Final Three for a CBS job, but whose agent got him into a new Final Four where he won the CBS Ring, er EYE... $52,000 annually for child support is more than a lot us are making with a Masters degree...

Anonymous | 3:53 p.m. Nov. 3, 2009

RE: cardster

Maybe you should have gone to BYU for a degree!!

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.