Reader comments
Group's report details aftermath of Prop. 8
416 comments | Read story
I promise you that LDS people don't account for half of California. Catholics were another population in favor of Prop 8. Why don't these people attack the Catholics. LDS people are an easy target because they don't fight back.
Think about it, who in their right mind would tick off the large southern California Catholic population. I promise you it would not turn out pretty.
The only reason why they aren't banging on the Pope's door is because he's out of reach.
This makes me question the motivation behind such laws.
You know the world is upside down when all the heterosexuals want to just live together, and all the homosexuals want to get married. Funny eh?
Pathetic.
This issue actually is important - and companies making political donations for the sole purpose of taking away rights from other citizens that they themselves enjoy is a "first" in America, and deserves vigorous public condemnation.
Wrong is right and right is wrong.
Persecuted for doing good...
Evil behavior is organized and they want to add legal legitimacy to their deviant acts. The fact they are making progress speaks of the corruption within government entities.
I expect it to get worse before it ever gets better.
I guess it is comforting to know how this all turns out in the end but in the interim the hate and bigotry against the church and its members will only intensify.
WOW...Sounds like a HATE CRIME! Arrest these terrorists....
You need to grow a backbone "John Pack Lambert".
Here's my take. Learning how the other person feels helps you to understand EMPATHY. If you can learn and comprihend empathy, then...and only then will you start to understand the true meaning of what Christ stood for.
So both sides should take a lesson here. Do unto others as you would have done unto you.
If you judge others lifestyle to be wrong, then likely your lifestyle is wrong also...with just a different issue blocking your way....
Though I am not a Mormon, I support anything that protects families.
This seems to be an attempt to justify such behavior. Am I to conclude that all the past deeds that I have always considered injustices (insults, intimidation, assaults) were actually justifiable and there has never been any unjustifiable persecution of gays? Sorry, I'm not buying it. Two wrongs never make a right.
That is just very twisted thinking.
You may disagree with me about certain behaviors being unhealthy/harmful for both society and individuals. But you won't persuade me that you are motivated by a desire for fundamental equality by advocating such a double standard. It reveals an underlying selfishness.
On the date they reported $2,000 that is what had been spent. On the next reporting date, in kind contributions had been made with a a higher value, and that was reported. By the date of the final report, there had been additional in kind contributions that were also reported.
Yes, the total value of those contributions rose with each succeeding reporting date since the contributions were continuing.
There was no cover-up. Everything was reported as the reports were due to the election commission.
the members donated the 8-20 million you reffering to, not the church. since when has it become a crime to donate to a cause you beleive in? are we creating a religious requirement for donations and voting? maybe we should start harrasing the gays who went agaisnt this measure and donated nearly the same amount. and lets not forget all the maney they spent on both of the court cases.
to: Pathetic, again | 9:07 a.m. Nov. 3, 2009
no rights are being denied. any man can marry any woman regardless if one or both are gay. what that Prop 8 did was nothing more than DEFINE the right. gays can marry. no one asks if you are gay when you get married. if the right to bear arms was in question would you be opposed if an initiative were put on the ballot that excludes rocket launchers? if such a law was passed, no rights would be denied, the right would merely be defined. that is what happend in california. no rights were DENIED, the right of marriage was DEFINED, and the definition is man and woman.
to flush after every use
to tolerate others but fight for whats right
to look at what made civilizations past fall
to not listen to the few loud mouths that want us to not only tolerate but $upport their twisted behavior
to fight twisting marriages and families till my dying breath
It's not a matter of luck. If God wanted two men or two women to reproduce as part of his plan for an eternal family, he would have created that. His creation was one man and one woman from the beginning to procreate and bring spirits into this world. Why as a lifetime Mormon would you question Gods plan? You either believe it, or you don't. Who's side are you on?
You may be a life lomg Mormon, or you may not, but I suspect you are a troll hiding behind the facade of "mormomism" to make you contribution wore papalable. Fact is, the ligitimizing or gay marriage and the well organized groups fostering it, will indeed lead to the abolishment of traditional marriage. This is just the foundation being laid for future legal bullying. Come ut of the closet girl or at least stand behind you faith.
Hmmm..... Read your history. I think the Mormons were burned out, raped & murdered for sport and driven from Ohio, Illinois, & Missouri for their definition of marriage. In fact, by executive order, it was legal to kill Mormons in Missouri until sometime in the 1970s. I don't recall the Mormons taking up arms, heck the Mormons hardly faught back much at all. They just moved on. Usually after losing everything....
We're getting closer to ending this. I hope I'm personally ready for when it happens. There is no going back now. I LOVE BEING a MORMON! I know that 2,000 righteous warriors conquered, and so shall those who stay true to their covenants. My faith has ALWAYS won out. It's never, EVER been easy - Just worth the fight.
I for one am proud that I am NO LONGER a Mormon. It confuses me that a group can claim that they follow the teachings of Christ--and yet act so UN-Christlike.
I am glad that I am a member of a church which is able to take a stand on important moral issues, regardless of the consequences.
Pledge, I hope you die soon.
Because the only marriage you should be concerned with is your own.
That choice remains within you.
Nobody was trying to cover anything up. The first deadline, where they reported the $2K, was one of many deadlines over the course of the fall. That first deadline wasn't for the grand total of all the contributions, but only some of them. They were only supposed to report contributions that happened BEFORE a certain date, and they that's what they did. It wasn't just the LDS church that reported a lower number under that deadline than under the final one. Every organization did, including the No on 8 side. The last deadline was for the grand total of contributions, and the LDS church met that deadline more than a month in advance.
There was no lie, there was no cover up. They listed the contributions that came before a certain date, and then they listed the final tally of all contributions, just like they were supposed to.
Do your research before making false claims, people!
Conformity will not be an issue when Moses parted the Red Sea. It won't be an issue when the sun doesn't come up for three days. Can't wait...
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Beckham says he'll be ready 8:47 p.m.
- Senate faces vote on health care 8:45 p.m.
- UPS raising rates for 2010 shipping 8:44 p.m.
- Barnes & Noble's Nook sells out 8:44 p.m.
- People on the move 8:43 p.m.
- SLCC given grant for jobs training 8:43 p.m.
- Broadweave and Veracity merge 8:42 p.m.
- McDonald's goes upscale in N.Y. 8:42 p.m.
- Man recalls running from KGB 8:41 p.m.
- Islamic banking coming to U.S.? 8:41 p.m.
- Mailman's nomination delivered
- Jazz finally win in San Antonio
- U. professor dies after fall from bus
- 'New Moon' rising: Vamps vs. 'wolves
- Horrifying scenario described
- Archuleta still calls Utah home
- 4A: Timpview wins 4th title, 4 years
- Officer cleared in Cardall Taser case
- Utah jobless rate at 6.5%
- Unga's status 'a game-time decision'
- Buttars wants to limit gay rights laws
182 - Palin plans tour stop in Utah
166 - MWC expand? Get rid of deadweight
141 - BYU, Utah struck gold in coaches
123 - Lies shatter Utah family
122 - Palin's book shows she's unqualified
99 - Officer cleared in Cardall Taser case
95 - Jazz finally win in San Antonio
94 - BYU cuts Women's Research Inst.
94 - Utes knock off rival Aggies
92
A little after midnight Wednesday morning, about 21 hours ago as I write...
There's a lot of reason to leave your plastic home as you shop:
Another defensive TD in the 2009 state champ.game? Yep, that same 'Ofa Latu'...
...non-BCS teams need to go through perfect seasons before somebody -...
How sad.
Let me tell you. TCU could hang with anybody! I think they would beat...
Does anyone else think this sounds a bit like Pete Rose betting on baseball?...
Horrible reporting, D-News. Not even a mention of the final score, let alone...
TCU had their 1st sellout in 20 years last weekend against the U; TCU is a...
@Insanity: Here's an answer to your financial question by asking you a...
Brown hurt is foot and had surgery after BYU. So no he is not a bust unlike...
Hey PrepFootballFan. These kids played hard and worked hard. Give them some...


