Reader comments
Capitol secures new tenants: well-funded lobbyists

6 comments   |   Read story

D man | 6:22 p.m. Oct. 28, 2009
I guess this shows that only the lobbyists with the most money are the ones who get access to our politicians. How can this be interpreted besides seeing that our politicians cater to the highest bidder?
Anonymous | 6:50 p.m. Oct. 28, 2009
You can always count on Linda Hilton to complain about how unfair life is.
Excuse Me. | 3:26 a.m. Oct. 29, 2009
Why are these lobbyists given even a place to make copies? They should not be given any office space, regardless of how much they pay. All lobbyists should be treated equal, not the big money people. I am against lobbbyists in any form or type. I think this shows a disregard for the people of Utah. How blatant is your hyprocrisy and show of disrespect for the people of Utah.

This contract should be cancelled immediately and the lobbyists told to go find their own private meeting space. They are not government employees. They are self serving people. Their whole goal is to grease the palms of their employers and really don't look at what is good for Utah.

They should not be allowed to use any room when the legislator is in session. Let them buy a home in the area and renovate it and walk across the street and use those rooms.

Again how disrespectful this is of the people of Utah.
Comments continue below
Big Money | 5:44 a.m. Oct. 29, 2009
still over rides the will of the People.
No where in the Constitution do I see anyting about these Big Money Lobbiest standing between the Polititians and the People.
This was a good idea to get some money from these crooks.
Anonymous | 6:52 a.m. Oct. 29, 2009
Insiders and money interests. How about the rest of us? Who represents the average person? Maybe we could give the lobbyists a desk on the floor of the chambers.
Lobbyists are not the enemy | 7:29 a.m. Oct. 29, 2009
How about we not be so narrow minded about this? Every one of us have causes that require the services of a paid lobbyist. Few of us can afford to take the time off to go educate the legislature about a cause or proposed legislation. So organizations hire or employ lobbyists.

They are a necessary part of a part-time legislature. Full-time legislatures have need for them as well.

If there is an enemy in any of this, maybe it is our model of democracy which allows all of us to seek for our own good.

And lest we still consider the status of the haves vs. the have nots: the poor have advocates at the legislature, and they are darn good at what they do. The advocates are very effective lobbyists.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

previousnext

Latest comments

As it was for President Bush as well.

Way to go! Being an insulin dependent diabetic is no small task. This boy...

Very well said. Also, our elected officials need to give patriotic duty to...

Rabbis join NJ gay marriage debate

. . . since it's the situs of a case in which the Attorney General's...

I hope for a quick recovery to this great competitor.

Group leery of lake bridge plan

Let's build a monorail!

Max Hall: a fixture in rivalry lore

Max Hall is the 'winningest' QB in BYU history. OR Max Hall is the...

With the emergence of Fes out of the D League it is looking more and more...

BYU's Emery injured in practice

Emery is the best player on the floor. He will be missed, but I think they...

There are believers and there are seekers. The believers just want everyone...

Advertisements