What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Growing pains: Rate of young men struggling...
- BYU student killed after falling 70 feet in...
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- Manti's 10th Rat Fink reunion marks 50 years...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
34 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
25 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
15 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Poll shows Utahns think Legislature's...
14 - Man shot brother while showing him...
13 - Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches
12






Another in a long train of abuses! I would bet my next paycheck that the judge who rendered this foolish decision had a gun under her robe.
I can perhaps understand disarming a man who had a felony conviction relating to a violent act. But I can NOT understand a conviction for pot being used as grounds to deny a man the right to defend his own life in his own home!
THERE IS NO JUSTICE IN AMERICA!!!!!
Felons are barred from possessing a gun, but there may be other weapons a felon, who has served their time and is not on any probation, might be able to use in the defense of his/her life.
Polearm, Knife, Sword, Pipe, or many other types of instruments which can be used to stop or mortally wound an attacker. The question is are felons allowed to use ANY weapon in his/her defense against an attacker?
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments