Reader comments
DUI fatalities decreased in '08

6 comments   |   Read story

dave | 8:07 p.m. Oct. 21, 2009
I thought the end of the sacred private clubs would result in mass slaughter on the streets. You people were dead wrong.
@ dave | 11:57 p.m. Oct. 21, 2009
Well dave, the private clubs law was repealed in June 2009. We haven't seen 2009 data yet. This data is for 2007-2008. Although I suspect like you that DUI fatalies will not increase because of the new law, pretty quick to jump the gun and lay it on "you people."

I'd just like to point out that while 16% of driving fatalities are DUI related, that means that 84% ARE NOT DUI related. 84%! So while DUI violators get the book thrown at them, there 5 times as many people causing driving deaths from texting, driving drowsy, and driving recklessly. Think about that next time you are driving sober and please pay attention.
@ Dave | 5:49 a.m. Oct. 22, 2009
Maybe it's "you people" that are the whole problem.
It's "you people" that drink and drive and kill innocent people.
It's "you people" that are "dead wrong."
Comments continue below
Johnny | 7:26 a.m. Oct. 22, 2009
Next: Ban cell phone drunks!
John Charity Spring | 12:52 p.m. Oct. 22, 2009
People such as Dave are ignoring the issue. The issue is not that every person in this State has not been killed by a drunk driver, the issue is that at least one person has been killed, and that is too many. Dave is simply repeating the modern view that drunkenness and sloth are perfectly acceptable. This view preaches that the only thing that matters is immediate self-gratification without regard to the consequences, even if it means the death of innocent people.
@ all y'all... | 3:39 p.m. Oct. 22, 2009
Drunkeness and sloth are perfectly acceptable! Just not behind the wheel. Likewise with driving while using a cell-phone, putting on make-up, eating breakfast, putting in a CD, or generally being on the road with other, lousy Utah drivers.

The fact of the matter is that you can't legislate your way out of people's bad judgment, and legislating from a singular, absolute moral viewpoint is not much better. Be it booze or other thorny issues. Yes, we have a lot of draconian laws. Let's constructively fix that...

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

previousnext

Latest comments

Has anyone given thought that the best way to avoid unwanted pregnanies is...

NY lawmakers reject gay marriage

Marriage has hardly been the foundation of every civilization. Please learn...

This show is still on the air? I thought ABC cancelled this show 2 years ago....

It would be more accurate for Scott Smith to say that the majority of people...

MWC awaits bowl destinations

"If the Las Vegas Bowl wants credibility, it should do the right thing and...

'Abortion is wrong! No excuses! Not rape, incest, health of the mother. A...

Max Hall did right thing after tirade

Im amazed that so much aniomosity has been directed towards Hall. Has anyone...

why does hatch care? he won't vote for the health care bill anyway

Sloan gets 1-year extension

It not that the Jazz lose, just "won and done" in the first round of the...

My family owns a cherry farm in Box Elder. We had an accident on our farm 20...

Advertisements