Comments about ‘Nominees selected for judgeships’
Public is invited to comment on district court candidates
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Growing pains: Rate of young men struggling...
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
- BYU student killed after falling 70 feet in...
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- Charges: Runaway teen caused accident that...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
34 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
25 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
15 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Poll shows Utahns think Legislature's...
14 - Man shot brother while showing him...
13 - Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches
12






It is riduculous that only one nominee for the Third District comes from a background in criminal law. For far too long, the governors have been appointing lawyers with civil backgrounds to preside over criminal cases. The current governor must off-set this imbalance by appointing a lawyer with a background in criminal law to the bench.
The right of the governor to appoint who he wants as a judge is one of the most important patronage perks of the office. Mike Leavitt also did not appoint judges with criminal law experience. Utah is known across the nation, even acknowledged by the US Supreme Court, as having a state supreme court that makes rules willy-nilly. That is the legacy of Leavitt, who appointed judges according to family, political and church ties, NEVER according to experience and qualifications. Ask any cop -- no one knows what the Utah supreme court will do in any case. They're just aren't consistent and they have the goofiest coalitions. Christine Durham is the most liberal justice in Utah's history and has zilch leadership ability. But she is politically connected and rich. What more did Leavitt need?
It's not all that "ridiculous" (as Whiggy asserts) that most of the judicial nominees come from practices in civil law. As long as the nominees are smart and motivated (as all of these nominees are), they'll be up to speed in both criminal and civil matters soon enough. I'd rather have a smart, fast learner than an average lawyer with criminal law expertise.
Try to at least get your facts right, Whiggy. Five of the last six appointees to the Third District have criminal law backgrounds, 3 exclusively, and two substantially. Sounds like an okay ratio to me, even if you think that area of practice is that big an issue.
Christine Durham was appointed to the State's Supreme Court by Scott Matheson, not Gov. Leavitt.
Justice Durham has recieved national recognition for her outstanding leadership skills, including the Rhenquist award named after the recent U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice. Last I heard she was not rich, except perhaps in intellectual accomplishments.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments