The difference between the two is a no brainer for the person who can read.

The way this was written I'm more confused than before.

If your intention is to clear up misunderstanding could you say what you mean, and leave out the literary fluff?

This article was confusing, trying to mesh two separate entities into one story. Even if the occasional tourist mixes up these two libraries, that does not constitute a valid reason for a front page news story.

It would have been better journalism to run separate articles on separate days, leave out all the filler about "bookends", locations, boundaries, etc., etc., and concentrate on one great exhibit or service provided, an individual or family experience at the facility or a history of successful programs and services.

This non-story is hardly worth the paper it is printed on, figuratively speaking. The picture is ridiculous, not connected to the story except in the general way that the temple and and JSM building are both owned by the Church, as are the two libraries.

You need a better editor.

I understand the church has all but stopped putting records on microfilm? For several reasons, film deteriorates faster than digital records, film has become comparitively more expensive as its use and manufacture decreases, digital is so much easier to work with after creating the image, and mayby last so much more information can be stored in such smaller space.

I agree with "Confusing Article," it took me rereading the article and then blocking it out to get the meaning of what the author was saying and I have two Masters Degrees.

From my perspective, the article was simple to read and understand.

I disagree with the previous grumpy commentators. The article is well written and clarifies the differences in the two entities - even for one without multiple college degrees.

Blacks in the church stand on their own merit. What are you talking about! The Chruch is not racist and stand arm in arm with all monorities.