Reader comments
Board votes against N-waste ban

3 comments   |   Read story

Non-hippy Californian | 10:45 a.m. Sept. 23, 2009
I appreciate the boards decisions. I am in not way affiliated with Energy Solutions either. It's a known fact that nuclear waste in the US has been the cause of exactly zero fatalities in the 60 plus years of the Nuclear age. The Nuclear industry is the most highly regulated industry in the world with COAL as a close second.
People living near nuclear facilities are bombarded with 200% LESS radiation than those who live within 200 miles of a coal power plant.
We should embrace the miracle of nuclear power and responsibly tackle the residual byproducts. The "not in my backyard" syndrome coupled with ignorant biases are the backbone of what's preventing the US from becoming an energy exporter in the world energy markets.
misses the point | 12:06 p.m. Sept. 23, 2009
The thing not really mentioned here, nor admitted by HEAL is that while the moratorium was going through the rule-making process, DU would continue to be received under the current regulations. ES can accept DU waste now under current rules, the moratorium would've been powerless until final rule making and legal appeals were complete (as was heard in the meeting last night, this could've taken 2-3 years). What the Board did was actually better than the moratorium because it is now able to hold ES responsible for a rule (yet to be finalized) more stringent than current rules at any time into the future.

What did become clear (and not mentioned in the article either) was that HEAL was looking for a ban on DU waste, not a moratorium. And as the NRC said last night, a ban would not be possible. So HEAL actually got more than what they asked for, it just wasn't what they really wanted.
CaptHowdy | 1:38 p.m. Sept. 23, 2009
Non-hippy Californian,
We've gotten to the point that NIMBY is no longer the fashionable environmental cry. It allows too much leeway. The new cry is BANANA:

Build
Absolutely
Nothing
Anywhere
Near
Anything

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

previousnext

Latest comments

Boys basketball rankings

"disgruntled parents need to stay of the blog?" Do we live in Communist China...

Cougars turn back Wildcats'

This is proof that you really are the elite of college BB. Just like the BCS...

Davis man sues over Tasering

The officers should be charged with attempted murder. They attacked an...

Closing the cave was a extreme response to a delicate situation.Sealing the...

Letters: No constitutional right

Re:You're Right "The Constitution definitely DOESN'T give the federal...

BYU will lose big, because I don't like them

She looks brain damaged from malnutrition. Look at her eyes, dried out and...

Give me a Break is about as ignorant as they come, but probably is far from...

My prayers and condolences for the family. Such a death is a horrible image...

To Bee Reasonable: So what if tithing is 10%? That's like saying because...

Advertisements