Comments about ‘Supreme Court considers legality of couple's marriage’
Recommended Stories
Sanpete pioneer
A beautiful new park has been dedicated to the early settlers of the Sanpete Valley.
BYU student killed in fall
A BYU student was killed Saturday after falling 70 feet while climbing near the Stewart Falls in Provo Canyon, officials said.
first stretch Corridor
Herriman and Riverton residents gathered to celebrate the opening of two miles of the new Mountain View Corridor.
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Growing pains: Rate of young men struggling...
- BYU student killed after falling 70 feet in...
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
- Manti's 10th Rat Fink reunion marks 50 years...
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war 34
- Cottonwood High School football coach... 25
- Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of... 15
- Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver 14
- Poll shows Utahns think Legislature's... 14
- Man shot brother while showing him... 13
- Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches 12
how many times did they actually cut down others for not marrying...that's the real issue!
Great Story.... What I want to know is after 37 years why seperate??? Just don't talk to eachother and one day one you might fine you are OK with eachother hanging out.LOL This is a mess!!! Good Luck to the Court.
They claimed to be married, they then "married" in the temple in addition to their claim of legal marriage. 37 years is more than enough time to change your mind....the court should rule it a marriage.
They lie to their families, they lie to their attorneys, they lie to the judge - then SHE expects them all to consider the truth, but still allow her to continue to rake in the absurdly large alimony she is supposedly "due" for being "married" to him.
I hope the whole things gets thrown out. She can't be trusted. He is bringing the truth to light, because he doesn't feel he should have to pay. He PROPOSED to her, more than once - and she said NO, more than once. I don't blame him one bit. This is absurdity by definition!
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments