Reader comments
Muslim modesty: Head coverings a symbol of faith or oppression?
31 comments | Read story
If they dress the same way in their country where everyone does the same, then they aren't doing it to stand out.
The hair of a man is the same, but why is it OK for a man to show his chest on the beach, but not a woman. Our culture has assigned a meaning to a woman's chest that is not assigned to a man. There is no logical reason other than it is our culture. The same applies to them.
The only thing that I object to is that they should not cover their face when they drive and their photo id should show their face and they should provide a photo id just like everyone else. Sometimes the face needs to be shown.
It is cultural diversity. I don't believe in the Quran, but I'll respect and support that they want to do that.
Tekakaromatagi
Spot-on TRUE!
I think there is a ONE HUGE difference between the oppression of Islamic women and the oppression of American women: one is done by men, the other by women.
In Islam, it seems, the oppression comes from the men. In the U.S., the oppression comes from other women.
My wife is somewhat overweight. This is not a problem for me; she looks attractive in her clothes, and has received compliments for her looks by other men. It is how the other WOMEN look at and treat her that is the issue. An entire thesis could be written on this point, but we are limited to only 200 words...
Bottom line: it is okay for women to oppress other women, so it's not an issue (in the news and such). In fact, NEITHER kind of oppression is okay -- we just hear about one while the other is ignored!
I think this is a very good article. The notion that women are "forced" to wear the hijab, and that it restricts their freedom is over-much. People who choose to follow rules do so of their own free will and choice, not because they are forced to.
Whether the hijab is a worthwhile thing, I am not sure. However, if a women choses to wear it, she should not be discriminated against for doing so. These women are not oppressed, the only oppressors are the French government who will not allow them to practice their religion.
It's sickening.
How is this any different?
I do agree that there are times when one's face needs to be visible, for the safety of being able to identify people, should a crime or other infraction of the law occur.
But the covering of the hair doesn't affect anyone else at all.
If women are oppressed in Western cultures by fads/styles/looks/etc. -- it is wrong. That doesn't make the oppression of women in Islamic cultures any less wrong. You won't even address the issues of female circumcision, forced marriages, honor killings, et. al.
Why so silent? I thought you 'cared' so much about these women, their welfare, their rights.
Or do you care most about *appearing* tolerant, non-judgmental, enlightened.
(To say every woman wearing the covering is doing it of their own volition is the height of sanctimonious conceit. How in the world do you know. Most of us are at least willing to admit some have free will and some do not.)
ever seen the faces of Afghani girls who've had acid thrown in their face for daring to defy the Taliban clerics and attend school?
Oh, I'm sorry, am I offending your self-loathing liberal Western sensibilities.
Their religious practices are sacred to them, why does it matter to us? As Americans we tend to always think we are the only ones living the "right" way. Their society is a complete 180 to ours, but that doesn't mean it's wrong. Just different. If only we took the time once in a while to try to understand instead of just passing judgements.
The world would be such a better place!
Religion uses women to control men. That's why there are often stricter dress and behavior codes for women. Religion controls women through their children.
If women would stop taking responsibility for men's behavior then religion would lose much of it's manipulative power.
Those who defend these islamic traditions "out of respect" for their culture have no idea what is going on in the world. Of course, it's easy to close our eyes and say "peace to all".
John Pack Lambert said: "These women are not oppressed, the only oppressors are the French government who will not allow them to practice their religion." Please study the issues. The approx. 6 million Muslims in France have all the freedom to build mosques and practice their religion. But the French government, after years of studying and debating the issue, has decided to protect in some limited cases the separation of Church and State the Republic has fought so dearly for. To prevent Islam to establish sharia law in some city areas. To prevent that France could become Saudi Arabia over time. The U.S. would do the same if threatened similarly.
As a Muslim woman, I certainly acknowledge oppression against Muslim women, often behind the cover of Islam (what better justification than relgion?). Yet, we must not create an unjust double standard by looking to religion when Muslim women are oppressed and to faulty, spontaneous human behavior when, say, Christian women are oppressed.
Plainly, if Islam preached the subjugation of women it would not be one of most populous religions. The Quran is there for anyone who wishes to uncover the peace of Islam. Otherwise, "to you be your religion, and to me be mine." (Quran, 109:6)
who invaded Iraq. Look at the UN that in itself is seriously wrong.
it is culture not religion that affects the Middle Eastern nations. islam does not say women are dirty and disgusting, and besides do western men really treat women better?
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- High school girls basketball: Top 20 1:40 a.m.
- High school swimming rankings 1:28 a.m.
- High school girls basketball rankings 1:19 a.m.
- High school boys basketball rankings 1:00 a.m.
- Preps of the week 12:49 a.m.
- Y. volleyball beats UVU 12:46 a.m.
- Sports on the air 12:43 a.m.
- Utah Jazz: Game at a glance 12:40 a.m.
- Williams' late jumper tops Spurs 12:34 a.m.
- Revive full food tax? 12:19 a.m.
- Cougars going back to Vegas
- Utah/BYU rivalry can be more civil
- TCU to play Boise in Fiesta Bowl
- Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing
- Witness: Mitchell stalked victims
- Bring the true spirit of Christmas
- Utes excited to go to San Diego
- BYU professor remembered
- Winter weather is here to stay
- Answers for the BCS
- Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing
261 - TCU to play Boise in Fiesta Bowl
203 - Letters: Global warming a lie
156 - Cougars going back to Vegas
147 - Utah/BYU rivalry can be more civil
134 - George lost in rivalry hatefest
119 - Ed Smart 'appalled' at testimony
100 - Harpring's NBA career is over
96 - Utahns want health care reform bills
78 - Utes excited to go to San Diego
75
That does it — I'm having an affair! Thanks to Tiger Woods, David...
When Boozer was shooting the free throws, why Sloan didn't substitute Mathew...
actions, I will be forced to be accountable for them. I refuse. I am an...
What's with the Utah fans flashing the double L sign?
@mark: So Sam da Ham... you were just making it up?" I'm a climate...
"I have no idea why BYU fans are talking smack about bowl opponents. Even if...
You say to "quit whining and play somebody." Isn't that what everyone is...
Reading these comments, I start wondering-- Whatever happened to faith? Why...
All those numbers when all you reall need to know is that BYU has beat Utah...
All thos numbers when all you reall need to know is that BYU has beat Utah...
So Sam da Ham, when you said this: "Not so. Al Gore is poised to make...




In the United States, we have explicit constitutional guarantees of religious freedom that generally allow us to live according to our personal interpretation of our religious beliefs. For Muslim women, this usually means that they are allowed to wear a hijab if they so desire. There have been cases where this right has been challenged, but almost always judges have ruled on the side of the Muslims.
I much prefer the American approach to the French one. Let these women exercise their constitutional right to practice their religion as they see fit.