What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large sodas...
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- Family at first sight: Girl with Down...
- Cottonwood High School football coach Josh...
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
35 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
30 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
25 - KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
21 - Utah woman adopted as baby faces...
18 - Vets heart Mitt: Romney enjoys big...
17 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
14






This fiscal attempt by the "Legislature Powers" only shows their determination to continue choosing their boundaries at the expense of the voters.
How can something like this ridiculous fiscal note happen in the first place?
Who directs the legislative analysts that determined the cost? Can they be fired for incompetence? What is $250,000 doubled?
@Ethics???: You might want to familiarize yourself with actual facts, numbers, and processes before you throw around charges that make you look foolish.
Actually, the story makes it sound like it was the Gov's Office that put the $1 million price tag on the initiative (not the Legis. Analyst as previous comment suggests).
Either way, though, $1 million is way too high. This really just shows how desperately the Ruling Party in both branches wants to cling to power.
If the Republicans really believe that their "product" satisfies more Utahns, they shouldn't have to gerrymander to win. Why are they so afraid of fair competition?
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments