Comments about ‘Pages of oldest Bible reunited on the Web’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In World & Nation
- Accusations of anti-Romney bias spark a media...
- Barack Obama's 'Polish death camp' gaffe...
- Magazine poll pegs Salt Lake City as second...
- Court: Heart of gay marriage law...
- Video games, porn hook young men, with sad...
- Federal appeals court rules against Defense...
- Romney Victory fund sharing cash with four...
- Police laud 'hero' in Seattle shootings
Most Commented
Across Site
In World & Nation
- Glenn Beck: Living large in Texas, and...
78 - Court: Heart of gay marriage law...
77 - Mitt Romney promises world's strongest...
49 - Mitt Romney says he won't draw focus to...
49 - Accusations of anti-Romney bias spark a...
37 - Mitt Romney clinches GOP nomination...
32 - Poverty, hunger among retirees increasing
24 - The price of freedom: Nearly half of...
23






It always surprises me that so many people believe the Bible was written as a one whole book straight from the mouth of God, when Biblical scholars have proven that the books of the Bible have undergone man-made changes over the centuries.
As this article says, “No other early manuscript of the Christian Bible has been so extensively corrected. . . . They range from the alteration of a single letter to the insertion of whole sentences.”
We do not have the original books of the Bible, but only copies of copies of copies. Note the date of this codex as being from the mid-300’s, and considered among the oldest we have.
There are over 45 reliable manuscripts,this confirms papryus 66,75, 2nd century fragments of the Gospel of John. There also enough quotes (26,00)from church fathers to reconstruct 99.9% the Bible.
If say the original triangle was in a museum and it was burnedin a fire,we have enough copies to figure out what the orign=inal looked like.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments