Deseret News | Reader comments: Mercury advisory for fish expanded

Reader comments
Mercury advisory for fish expanded

Natural? | 5:27 a.m. July 2, 2009

What do they mean by natural? Is it natural runoff from old mine tailing?

No amount of mercury is safe and it has an accumulative affect when eaten, even in small doses it can grow to excessive levels in our bodies. Not only does this affect humans, it affects the fish and any animal eating the fish causing deformities and death.

It seems the DWR and department of health are fearful of losses in license fees and put money over the health and safety issue. Health departments are not reliable or honest about any of this information they release. The guidelines and limits are used to deceive the public to benefit government agency's and water systems.

So. UT Fisherman | 4:30 p.m. July 6, 2009

Guess we'll start seeing some fantastic wiper fishing in Newcastle now that everyone is basically forced to catch and release...It would be nice if the DWR could identify the source of the mercury and create a plan of action to address the problem. This makes 3 of southern Utah's few reservoirs unfit for harvesting fish. I wonder if the others have been tested recently? who else is eating poison fish unknowingly?

Anonymous | 4:33 p.m. July 6, 2009

Make that 4 reservoirs unfit for harvest.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.