Old stuff | 10:25 p.m. June 24, 2009
This isn't new. I don't see why they even bother having these tournaments. Unfortunately even when money isn't involved, you can't expect people to provide an accurate score. Now throw in money and self rating. Come on!
2iron | 3:37 p.m. June 25, 2009
I played a lot of golf in the early 1990's and kept a fair record of my play, eventually working my handicap down to about 8. Then I didn't play for a few years due to being broke and broken.
When I started playing again and re-joined the UGA, my handicap was still about 8, but due to injuries, the best I can hope to play is about 15 shots per 18 holes higher now. So the fairness thing works both ways. I can't compete as an 8 handicapper so why bother wasting money playing in a tourney? It should be based on your last 20 scores, not your lowest scores ever posted.
PP | 9:30 p.m. June 25, 2009
---It should be based on your last 20 scores---

It is based on your past 20 scores. In more detail, it is based on the best 10 of your past 20 scores. So when you "shoot your handicap" you are not playing average, you are playing much better than your average - which is even more ammo against sandbagers.

I just don't understand sandbaging. It's like the schoolyard bully picking on the little kids. I would rather loose to guys better than me than win without a challenge.
Comments continue below
Local clubs are the key | 11:22 p.m. June 25, 2009
Since every club has cheaters (sandbaggers) it is their responsibility to police this problem, and it is a very big problem. They are the ones who know which players don't post scores, they are the ones who know which players post false scores, so they are the ones who should do something about it. The UGA, if it knows of associations that don't do this, should pull their handicap computers, because monitoring handicaps and providing peer review is an obligation that comes with being part of the UGA and USGA handicap system.
Reality Check | 8:42 a.m. July 20, 2009
The UGA and Pagel are right; it is all about the money. And the UGA will never pull the computers from any club because it is all about the money to them. 30,000 members at $25 a member is about $750,000 a year for them. Maybe Mike Sorensen should ask how many times in the past the UGA has pulled a computer out of a club? Or even how many times the UGA has revoked a membership because of sandbagging???? I have it from a reputable source that it never has. It is always interesting to me to see how critical an organization like the UGA is of others when it is one of the biggest parts of the problem! Shame on the UGA!

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

previousnext

Latest comments

Editorial: 10 years of TRAX

Sorry earlier I meant to say that tracks seems to travel at 35 miles an hour...

'Peter Frumhoff, the director of science and policy at the Union of...

The Non-BCS crowd ought to create their own title game...their own brand, and...

Letters: Democrats' ethics

That's the whole of your defense of GOP resistance to badly-needed ethics...

Your criticism should hardly be focused on Bennett alone. What about all the...

'Wired's Threat Level blog reported on November 20 that Gavin Schmidt, a...

The reality of climate change is supported by multiple lines of evidence and...

BYU professor remembered

I had the priviledge of staying in the LeBaron home on severl occasions as I...

Letters: Growing jobless rate

So the unemployment rate has dropped to "just" 10%, huh? I wonder what that...

Ahh for the love of money...what money can buy!!!

Advertisements