Reader comments
House kills Utah Rep. Rob Bishop's Pelosi probe

Shocker | 1:27 p.m. June 16, 2009

Gee, what a surprise; a Democrat majority voting to protect their Democrat Speaker of the House from an investigation.

What's next?, marching in lock-step with the Democrat President as he pushes us towards socialsim?

Oh, wait, you guys already do that too....

Wake up | 1:35 p.m. June 16, 2009

Doesn't Bishop have anything better to do in congress? Is he aware 10% of his constituents are out of work.

Sorry Rob | 1:38 p.m. June 16, 2009

Of course she lied. But she's got more friends than you do!

Comments continue below

Scott | 1:43 p.m. June 16, 2009

Pelosi is a disgrace to the nation.

Anonymous | 1:58 p.m. June 16, 2009

I'm really beginning to wonder if Nancy is going a little senile, a touch of insanity or something else due to getting on in years...she has been doing and saying some very strange things.

Anonymous | 2:09 p.m. June 16, 2009

this is a red herring and you all know it.

Baughan | 2:24 p.m. June 16, 2009

Lying to the tax payers started in 1992-2000 amd resumeed in Jan. 2009. When your leader's lie to you, who can you believe.

Anonymous | 2:34 p.m. June 16, 2009

What's Rob's problem, she is not him.
Is it the gender problem, or who i whom or what?
Let's be nice, all will come out in the wash, sooner or later.
Gimme a break!

Bob | 3:00 p.m. June 16, 2009

It's all those drugs she must have done in the '60s. It is terrifying to think this non-thinking woman is 3rd in line for the Presidency. And.. after what happened to Jimmy Carter today, we need to keep the succession in mind.

Nonymous | 3:22 p.m. June 16, 2009

I think the accusations are worth being looked at, even though there are grave economic problems. What Rob says is true: Either the speaker of the house is lying, or the CIA is lying.

Since either of those possibilities represent corruption at the highest levels of government, I want to believe that Nancy Pelosi is right and that she was lied to.

However, since Nancy Pelosi isn't calling for an investigation (and as head of house intelligence, it would be her place to do so), I must assume that she knows she knows she is in the wrong.

"Democrat" and "Republican" are just two words for "Corruption".

lost in DC | 9:23 p.m. June 16, 2009

funny how Pelosi calls it a partisan ploy, when it's a partisan ploy that's protecting her. did any of the dems think for themselves or did they all vote in lock-step with their party leadership?

I guess the transparency BO called for does not extend to his party's house leadership.

xscribe | 10:14 p.m. June 16, 2009

@Shocker and Lost in DC: If you don't think the republicans would not do the same thing, you're very naive. You know as well as I that parties stick with each other. Give me a break!

Bishop Does a Lot | 11:07 p.m. June 16, 2009

Just because Bishop offered this resolution doesn't mean he isn't doing other things in Congress. He's been fighting for Hill AFB and ATK jobs in opposing the Obama Administratin plans for defense cuts. (Ironic isn't it? Obama spends trillions for bailouts, ACORN, welfare, paying people's mortgages, even bailing out other nations withour tax money, but can't adequately fund defense).

Anonymous | 7:04 a.m. June 17, 2009

Bishop is grandstanding and being used by party types who care more for power than for the welfare of the country. Think about this, so what if Pelosi or any member of Congress knew or not about CIA torture. The nunaces of security briefings can be twisted be any of the parties. The ultimate responsibility for torture lies with the Administration which perpetrated this horrendous practice. And for "Bishop Does a Lot", Obama has acutally increased defense spending, so you don't know what you are talking about. Besides, are you suggesting there is not enormous waste in the military? Or are you more interested in spending in Utah, which goes contrary to the anti-earmark rhetoric. Again, Bishop is a pawn in the GOP hypocritical political game. They are more interested in themselves than true patriotism.

lost in DC | 12:20 p.m. June 17, 2009

xscribe, yes, the repubs would do the same.

are you defending queen nancy, or just attacking the other side?

I find it funny that when repubs vote in a block it's purely partisan, but it's never described that when dems vote in a block.

All I'm saying is if it's partisanship on one side, it's partisanship on the other.

An Observer | 5:48 p.m. June 17, 2009

I guess Obama and liberal democrats really do not want opem and transparent goverment,

they have shown they are more than willing to hide their dirty laundry.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.