Reader comments
Gay-rights activist calls for D.C. march
340 comments | Read story
To those of you who seem to think this is about special rights.
There are no special rights that gays are given, in fact, rights typically given to heterosexuals are denied to gays. When gays ask for them, some chide them as if to ask "no, that's not for you to have. It's only allowed for people to want to be --- (oh, I don't know) --- heteronormative?"
Examples:
1. Heterosexual people are not asked in the military about their orientation/identity. There is no such thing as "don't ask, don't tell" for heterosexuals.
2. Heterosexual atheist/agnostic people who are married civilly are never told that marriage is a sacred religious institution. Or for that matter, heterosexual people who choose not to have a religious ceremony.
3. The vast number of violent hate crimes based on sexual orientatin/identity are directed towards gays. Out of 1,454 hate crimes reported last year through the FBI, 19 were directed at heterosexuals. The rest were against LGBT.
4. If LGBT people are denied marriage, what are the alternatives?
a. therapy - doesn't work
b. celibacy --- and make gays modern-gay eunuchs?
"Its really pretty simple. Mormons believe in their modern day leaders, you already know that. They have taken the stand many times that marriage is between a man and a woman. You already know that too. Why are you asking queastions that you all already know the answer to. Are you somewhat conflicted inside?"
No conflict inside ME. There IS conflict and contradiction in your dogmatic claims. "Mormons believe in their modern day leaders" - does this mean you believe in the infallibility of those leaders? Can they be wrong? According to THEIR OWN WORDS, they CAN!
So if you "believe in your modern day leaders", believe them when they say they are NOT infallible, and are common men with common testimonies doing the best they can and (hopefully) relying on inspiration from heaven. But there are no guarantees. If you believe there ARE guarantees in this regard, then YOU are the apostate who preaches for doctrine ideas that are NOT doctrine!
We use your accusations as fodder in our rallies!
"You Cannot be actively and Openly Gay and hold a Temple Recommend, it just doesn't happen with your Bishop's full knowledge and your Stake President's full knowledge. It's impossible!"
Many aspects of my private and personal life are NONE OF THE BISHOP'S AND STAKE PRESIDENT'S BUSINESS!
I can and I have been active in the Church and gay at the same time for over ten years! I keep private things private. That is as it should be.
Martin Luther king Jr. Once said "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Even if they didn't live in Utah the injustice would still effect them...
Why is it? | 5:46 p.m. June 8, 2009
You wrote,
1. "Why do gays insist in cultivating an inferior culture. One ridden with disease,"
Have you seen the statistics about the higher rate of sexually-transmitted diseases in Utah.
2. "socially outcast, deviant from the norms"
Only if you cast them out. Gays do not cast themselves out.
3. "it can't reproduce itself."
Many gay men and lesbians do in fact reproduce when they go through the "let's try marriage with a hetero partner/spouse to see if this will cure this"
Even if gays did not reproduce, there would still be gays, because new gay generations are born all the time to heterosexuals.
Gays have been around for millenia.
4. "deviant culture"
Deviancy, no. Different yes.
The real deviancy is when people fall under the impression that gays can be "fixed" as if by magic.
Gays are not confused heterosexuals. For the most part, gays are confused when they think they are heterosexual.
And I mean EVERYTHING!
While true, the "gay gene" question may remain open for some time, other studies seem to suggest that there may, in fact, be indeed other scientific findings that show that gays are, after all, not confused heterosexuals.
Point in fact,
"Brains of gay men show similarities to those of heterosexual women"
"The brains of gay men resemble those of straight women, according to research being published Tuesday that provides more evidence of the role of biology in sexual orientation.
Using brain scanning equipment, researchers said they discovered similarities in the brain circuits that deal with language, perhaps explaining why homosexual men tend to outperform straight men on verbal skills tests -- as do heterosexual women.
The area of the brain that processes emotions also looked very much the same in gay men and straight women"
Source: Denise Gellene,
Los Angeles Times June 17, 2008
Is this a case to show that being gay is hard-wired?
How do you change the way your brain is wired?
If you are for sustaining Church doctrine, that is great, wonderful. That is great and cherished.
On the issue of same-sex marriage, however, what is the solution?
These are the findings for different agencies who purport to cure gays.
1. Exodus
In a study conducted by Regent United they stated,
"We found little evidence that involvement in the Exodus change process was harmful to
participants in this study.
Taken together, these findings would appear to contradict the commonly expressed view
of the mental health establishment that change of sexual orientation is impossible and that the
attempt to change is highly likely to produce harm for those who make such an attempt."
Source:
A Longitudinal Study of Religiously Mediated Change in Sexual Orientation
Paper for the American Association of Christian Counselors, Nashville, Tennessee; 9/07
Stanton L. Jones (Wheaton College) and Mark A. Yarhouse (Regent University)
To counter the trend of continuing failure rates in its movement, groups such as Exodus continually re-align their philosophy with such campaigns as "An Older, Wiser Ex-Gay Movement"
Source: Christianity Today, Oct 2007
One is left to ask, you mean they didn't right the first time?
On Celibacy for gays | 7:18 p.m. June 8, 2009
True, at that. The original reason why celibacy was instituted among Catholic clergy was not to keep men separate, pure, chaste, etc. from "women" and in the case of nuns pure "from men."
Celibacy for Catholic priest was begun later to keep priests from giving their (Church) property to their spouses and children.
History dotcom reads,
"Having no doctrinal bearing in the Roman Catholic church, celibacy is regarded as a purely disciplinary law. A dispensation from the obligation of celibacy has occasionally been granted to ecclesiastics under exceptional circumstances, for instance, to provide an heir for a noble family in danger of extinction."
"Celibacy"
If we were to believe that Catholics priest have always been celibate, why then, did Peter, (according to Catholic Church, have a mother-in-law?)
(Matthew 8:14)
What about the children | 7:26 p.m. June 8, 2009
True, divorce rates are lower in the states where same sex marriage is allowed or where it is close to being passed.
States where divorce is less common:
State Rate of divorce per 1000/year
Massachusetts 2.4
Connecticut 2.8
New Jersey 3.0
Rhode Island 3.2
New York 3.3
Pennsylvania 3.3
On the other hand, California fares #17 and Utah falls in #21.
In Canada, a study shows that divorces have leveled off since the 1970s. One reason why the number of divorces has not not fallen further down is because some partners marry, divorce, remarry, and divorce again, driving the divorce rate higher than couples who only divorce once.
Further, another study finds that while the American divorce rate is about 50% in the United States, in Canada it is 44%.
People will usually read too much into what the LGBT are trying to say and will read something that is not there.
What we are saying is "equal rights for us too."
I don't recall ever seeing that traditional families were bad.
Traditional families are fine and great. If you want to define your family as a mother, a father who never get divorced, and who have children, great, wonderful.
If gays want to be married and call their families families - with a mom and a mom, or a dad and a dad, and children.
That is great also.
How is the realization that having a gay family in any way alter the fact that the other family is less of a family?
They are both families.
However, if people keep the notion that their traditional family is under attack it is only because you want to make believe.
Both to be celebrated, cherished.
For that matter, I believe that single parents in any church, including the LDS Church, would be withheld from using the term family. We are together.
Further, families without children, great too.
Secondly, if they have, in fact, had "ample opportunities to take their case to the supreme court... how do you know that they were "reluctant to do so"???
Your entire post reeks of an opinion wrapped up and served as a fact... Whered you get your info???
As for "do we feel lucky"
There have many state supreme courts, including California who have said that banning gay marriage is unconstitutional... this is why some states have to "amend", or change the constitution. Because if your hate isn't in the constitution, then change the constitution. Anyways... yes, I would feel very luck but would you???
Money(Greed)
Power(Control)
Passions(Appetites)
That's how Satan gets you. Simple.
Once you figure that out, You have Freedom and Choice. Now go and "Choose The Right."
While I don't think it's simply a matter of genetics, I can assure you that your daughter is wrong (at least in the vast majority of cases.)
It's funny, because I see it the other way around - the gay marriage opponents have been completely unable to provide solid, logical arguments for their position, instead of resorting to mindless rhetoric.
Society needs children more than anything else to survive.
People who practice only homosexuality cannot produce children.
Society should therefore only encourage sexual behavior/relationships that will produce children.
If 2 people of the same gender want to live together and have a sexual relationship, fine. But they should receive no benefits for doing so, because that would encourage more people to engage in the same behavior.
Man + Man = guaranteed nothing
Man + Woman = children in more cases than not
Society needs children more than anything else to survive.
People who practice only homosexuality cannot produce children.
Society should therefore only encourage sexual behavior/relationships that will produce children.
If 2 people of the same gender want to live together and have a sexual relationship, fine. But they should receive no benefits for doing so, because that would encourage more people to engage in the same behavior.
Man + Man = guaranteed nothing
Man + Woman = children in more cases than not"
I didn't realize we were facing a shortage of people in America. We don't need to encouarge higher population, we have plenty of people. And as has been said before if this is your reasoning, then every heterosexual couple should have to get a fertility test before marriage to assure they can produce children, since we wouldn't want to give marriage benefits to people who can't produce children.
Lock me up, torture me, and as long as I am alright with God, I will be happy.
Also, when all this plays out and you get your "rights" and still feel vacant inside, God will always be there to help you overcome your self. He has helped me overcome inclinations far worse than homosexuality and he can help you too.
Who is going to pay for Bush and Obama's insane spending? Future generations. Unfortunately, we have already mortgaged their lives to pay it off. If our population decreases we will default on the debt and America will go bankrupt. America cannot afford any population decrease! That is reason enough to laugh homosexual marriage off the national stage.
I'm sorry. Your sheep did not love you. They are incapable of returning your affection, unlike a gay relationship. Your sheep were unable to give permission to your advances. You abused them because of their non-consent. Your sheep were victims.
If you cannot see the difference between your story and a gay relationship, you have bigger problems than liking sheep.
Do they really think that anyone is going to say - Hey, wow, this is great.. maybe we should rethink our stance here ..
You were taught a truth - you turned your back on it
You were given temple covenants - you turned your back on them
You were given the Priesthood - you turned your back on it...and gave it up! for what?
You gave up the right to have ETERNAL families
You turned your back on revelation
You turned your back on scripture
WHY SHOULD I RESPECT YOU !!!
love the sinner - not the sin YES
But respest you for what you have done... NO WAY!!!!
go on and have your fun....
you will pay for that fun eternally!!!!
Ok, then I go back to the other part of my statement, if you really believe that homosexual marriage shouldn't be allowed because it can't produce children, then there needs to be a fertility test for every heterosexual couple who plans to get married. Any heterosexual couple that can't produce children will be denied marriage. Since according to you its so important for people to procreate then you should have no problem with this since infertile heterosexual couples can't procreate either.
I have never been to the moon - but I know it's there. I have never seen the Roman empire in all it's might but I know it existed
I have never seen God but the spirit has wispered and I know that he also is real and that his truths and commandments are real and eternal. Can I PROVE it to you - No, but I cannot prove these other things to you either and they are real. When the spirit testifies you know without the confunsion of the world - unless, you let the world in to dominate your life. The spirit has spoken to my heart and I know what I know - AND I know that God knows that I know and I dare not deny it.
JanSan
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Davis seeking donations for seniors 10:40 a.m.
- Palin tickets still available 10:24 a.m.
- Obama to note conflict of Nobel 10:19 a.m.
- Dem health coalition survives deal 10:10 a.m.
- Obama directs $600M for health 10:07 a.m.
- Stocks turn mixed 10:06 a.m.
- EPA chief on U.S. regulating CO2 10:00 a.m.
- Storm pounds Midwest, New England 9:56 a.m.
- Geithner: bailout program extended 9:50 a.m.
- Panel passes college playoff bill 9:39 a.m.
- Snow brings big chill
- Expert calls Mitchell delusional
- Hot Rod behind mic for Lakers
- Andersen apologizes for Jordan hoax
- Cougars use depth to beat ASU
- Yet again, we learn BCS is a big joke
- Non-BCS schools not given fair shot
- Ranking the bowl games
- Max Hall wants to look ahead
- BYU football: Bronco weighs in on Hall
- Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing
280 - Letters: Global warming a lie
219 - TCU to play Boise in Fiesta Bowl
206 - BYU football: Bronco weighs in on Hall
172 - Cougars going back to Vegas
150 - Utah/BYU rivalry can be more civil
143 - Andersen apologizes for Jordan hoax
121 - George lost in rivalry hatefest
120 - Ed Smart 'appalled' at testimony
100 - Revive full food tax?
96
My wife Lisa and I would prefer never to argue. But that's not going to...
For the latest news in the health care debate and how it affects you...
It's called fraud, and it's a crime. People go to jail for this sort of...
Please come back and call TV games Hot Rod. Bolerjack is the worst...
Good to know there are only 20 fools in Utah who think this is a good idea.I...
That was more awful than I could ever imagine.
What will happend when the stimulus money that is temporarily funding these...
Regarding your Best Picture Oscar analogy, it is slightly off. It is like...
I agree the jazz lost this game last week, by not rotating in another center,...
-13 at my home in Richfield this morning. Please can we get some of that...
The Utes will keep improving, and we know the Ute-BYU game will go either...
I cannot wait to have her sign a book she did not write and probably did not...




Second of all, the Mormons will NEVER have to recognize gay marriage. They still have their freedom of religion. And any stories you have heard otherwise have just been used in context to spew the lies and get you to believe what they want you to believe.