Roland Kayser | 8:23 a.m. May 24, 2009
Adams, in his personal life, was quite sceptical about religion. He thought, however, that the common man required the restraints imposed upon him by religion in order to lead a productive and orderly life. His public pronouncements reflect that attitude, not what he personally thought about religion.
Mike Richards | 12:01 p.m. May 24, 2009
Mr. Cannon, this installment is another well researched, well pondered, well written article that we all would be well advised to read and ponder. This installment is particularly pertinent to much of the discussion going on as readers respond to letters to the editors. One group relies upon an imperfect knowledge of and understanding about God while the other group rejects any reference to God because they, themselves, also have an imperfect knowledge of and understanding about God.

Your article showed the outcome of two nations who also had those same basic attitudes. One nation rose out of obscurity to become the World Power that it is today. The other nation fell from being a World Power to becoming a nation almost cloaked with obscurity.

And now, those who refuse to study history would have America follow the path that France chose to follow - which makes your articles so very important and so very timely.
Jim F. | 5:17 p.m. May 24, 2009
Another very well-thought-out and clearly written piece. I'm envious of your ability to do so much in so little space.

But, of course, I have a quibble: I quibble with the sharpness of the distinction between the two Revolutions and two Enlightenments. As you well know, the cross-fertilization between British thinkers and French ones was enormous. The former listened carefully to what their French brothers were saying, the latter paid a great deal of attention to what their British colleagues were writing.

As a result, though there is no question that you are right about the difference in tendency between the two, each also contained strains of the other.
Comments continue below
Roland Kayser | 6:40 p.m. May 24, 2009
To Mike Richards: France is about the size of Texas and has about one-fifth the population of the U.S., yet they are still the world's 5th largest economy. They do alot of things there that I would not like to see here, but, all things considered, they are doing alright.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

previousnext

Latest comments

Gifts for gamers

There are some games I love not on your list. Arkham Asylum for one.

Daughter: Mitchell fed me my pet

Our parents made my brothers help kill and clean our rabbits before we ate...

Why would you keep it open? I would understand if there was a lot of amazing...

The government will run our health care well? Read Reader's Digest, November...

BCS stable at top, Y. up to 14

TCU stomped on the MWC so they are naturally ready to crush Florida, Alabama...

Jazz win 6th in 7 games

could you understand Dave Locke any more than my mom does and she is not even...

Notre Dame fires Weis

Attending the ND/BYU game 3 years ago in south bend, a couple of things stuck...

I missed the game, actually i heard a little bit of Locke on the radio (man...

Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal

quotes were good: Article was dumb and unnecessary.

Understanding translation process

I believe the art depicting Joseph looking at the plates may possibly be...

Advertisements