Reader comments
Finally — radioactive waste leaving Moab

8 comments   |   Read story

Anonymous | 9:04 a.m. May 5, 2009
"Because most of the radioactive elements are gone, the remaining tailings contain small amounts of radioactivity." So obviously the original ore was hotter than the tailings. How much of this original ore still exists in nature, and how much of it comes into contact with (is eroded into) water that drains into the Colorado?
Pete Swinford | 10:19 a.m. May 5, 2009
Having camped in Moab, they didn't mention clouds containing radioactive elements. And one wonders about all of the people who drank this water down-stream.
Nature vs Man | 10:50 a.m. May 5, 2009
The natural leaching of elements into our water systems happens all the time. The problem with the tailings pile is that it is a concentrated mass of what used to be spread through the soil. Leaching small amounts of that dispersed material poses a much smaller health risk than that posed by a hundred acres pile of concentrated materials. If natural leaching is causing health concerns then it's time to find an alternative source.
Comments continue below
Sue | 11:34 a.m. May 5, 2009
I'm happy for the people in the Moab area, it is just beautiful there, as I visited there lsst year.
Now, my question is...where did all that radio active stuff get taken to?? Will someone answer that for me? Thank you!
re: Sue | 2:56 p.m. May 5, 2009
As the article stated, the tailings are being taken to Crescent Junction... see related article for specifics
Anonymous | 4:45 p.m. May 5, 2009
The myth, from a scientific standpoint, is that it is very difficult to get cancer from radiation--there are better (easier) ways to get cancer; radiation is a difficult way. So with "low-level" uranium, the risk is even lower. It's complete nonsense about a "dead zone along the Colorado River." There is no dead zone, and there is no more risk in boating, fishing, or swimming along the Colorado River than hiking in the mountains.
Mustang_Man | 4:57 p.m. May 5, 2009
To move something that could be processed and then stored is a crime. The tailing should be sent to White Mesa Mill south of Blanding where it could be reprocessed and then stored in one spot. Now we have a new site that who knows in 40 or 50 years a town might spring up at Cressent Junction. I know that I don't want my childrens children to have to pay to move it again and again and again. Most sciencetist that studied the tailing wrote reports that they were contain where they were. What little that was leaching into the Colorado was so minute that 2 miles down stream you couldn't detect it. I am against this whole thing it will cost billion and billions before this is over and what will we have to show for it another site!!!!
Thank You! | 6:03 p.m. May 5, 2009
This is a wonderful breakthrough for the thick minds of the people who decided to put this crap here in the first place! It doesn't matter if it is only a small amount. It can still hurt, and it does. Would you be drinking water daily that had trace amounts of uranium in it? No! Would you be camping in a campground with a nuclear waste site sitting beneath your feet? No! But, however, we are still wating for the day when the even thicker-skulled people who use uranium power to realize that nuclear energy is NOT the solution to America's power crisis! It hurts more than it helps. It requires more energy to aquire, extract, and dispose of that it is worth. Although I favor nuclear power slightly more than oil, coal, and gas, we just have to get used to the idea that fuel cells, wind power, and solar power is the future for America. When that happens, I'll be happy.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Image

Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. speaks at the ribbon-cutting ceremony on Monday to mark the start of the removal of contaminated uranium tailings from the old Atlas Mill site near Moab.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Cougars beat Utes, 26-23

This is kinda funny. BYU wins the rivalry game this year but other than a...

Cougars beat Utes, 26-23

good game (though both teams aren't awesome). Good luck to both in the bowls.

Yea, I belive that it was just afreak accident, these things happen all the...

Cougars beat Utes, 26-23

I love reading all your sour grapes comments.. Your Football team lost but...

Um, specific examples?

Cougars beat Utes, 26-23

Kyle Whittingham, coach of the Utes. Dear Utah fans, whine all you want,...

Cougars beat Utes, 26-23

@BCS Scoreboard | 8:50 p.m. Nov. 28, 2009 BYU National championships 1...

Aggies hold on, win wild one

It is awesome to end the year with a win! Hopefully they can build on this...

Cougars beat Utes, 26-23

Couldn't agree with you more. Max Hall may have won games, but he won ugly. I...

The comments by the first poster on this thread say it all. How do you even...

Advertisements