What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- Growing pains: Rate of young men struggling...
- Charges: Runaway teen caused accident that...
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- BYU student killed after falling 70 feet in...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
33 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
25 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
14 - Poll shows Utahns think Legislature's...
14 - Man shot brother while showing him...
13 - Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches
12






"Very good for the court"???? What about the local business that depend the courts to force delinquent customers who don't pay their bills? How about frustrated consumers and businesses alike that are forced to take legal action to force someone to live up to their contract obligations? Did the courts ever think that instead of raising money they are lowering the peoples ability to utilize the system? In an effort to save jobs did they think..."hey if price goes up could demand drop?"
My final question for the day...Did the Deseret News think of any of this? Nice story, but it sure doesn't tell the whole story.
The taxpayers have been subsidizing these businesses for years. It's time the businesses paid a fair "users fee" for the services they get from the courts and the sheriff's office.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments