What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- Growing pains: Rate of young men struggling...
- Charges: Runaway teen caused accident that...
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- BYU student killed after falling 70 feet in...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
33 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
25 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
14 - Poll shows Utahns think Legislature's...
14 - Man shot brother while showing him...
13 - Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches
12






If this happens there will be a mass exodus of ambulence chasers from Utah heading west! Always room for them in California!
Once again, the Deseret News gets it wrong. This bill does not extend "immunity" to anyone. That was just a trial attorney scare word that is nowhere to be seen in the bill. Please try to stick to the facts, do some actual investigating, and resist the temptation to simply repeat the sensational statements of the self-interested.
I agree with Skinni..."immunity" is not granted in the law. Now the trial attorneys will need to provide "clear and convincing evidence" that malpractice occured. Just like any other person would want in a case brought against him/herself. A blow to "ambulance chasers," but should not have included the sunset clause.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments