Reader comments
Utah No. 1 in online porn subscriptions, report says

322 comments   |   Read story

Who rejoices in another's sin? | 12:20 a.m. March 3, 2009
I wouldn't jump to any conclusions about people in Utah. The data doesn't support that bias. I'm young. I'm male. I've been raised on Mormon values. And I live in Utah. But I don't view porn, precisely because of those factors, not in spite of them. Frankly, wherever I live, I will live my religion. I don't have to move away from Utah to do that. I don't have to live in Utah to do that.

The data means nothing to my personal life, but the concern is for each individual that it does represent. For those that are ensnared by the poison that is pornography I for one don't condemn you, but rather plead that you recognize this filth for what it is, depart from it, regain your self control and your self respect. Instead of excuses for behavior, repent and become anew that you may live justified in your actions. And if someone calls you a hypocrite for it, theirs is the greater offense, so feel sorry for them, and just turn the other cheek. There's no such thing as too good to be true.
shawilli | 1:49 a.m. March 3, 2009
expect to hear about this in April Conference...I am sure that some members engage in this, but hopefully the problem is not prevalent amoung the members of the church.
This study is debunked | 4:33 a.m. March 3, 2009
This "study" and conclusion is junk and is debunked at the Wall Street Journal editorial page. Too bad the Deseret News didn't look at this critically enough before swallowing it hook, line and sinker.

Comments continue below
Junk analysis | 4:40 a.m. March 3, 2009
Wow, can't believe this was even printed. See the following from the Wall Street Journal.

"Utah has only 1.69 subscriptions per thousand people. The Beehive State's population is 2.7 million, according to the latest census estimate. That means the total number of Utahns who subscribe to the porn service Edelman analyzes is less than 5,000--quite a small number on which to conclude that the place is full of moralistic deviants."
Robb F | 5:40 a.m. March 3, 2009
I don't live in Utah but served a mission there. I had always heard of the "Utah Mormon" phenomenon before going. What I discovered is that there are simply more of every type of member in Utah. There are more faithful, humble members, more hypocrites, more less active, more everything. Basically, whatever a person wants to find when they come to Utah and meet the members, they will find. Then they can let that color their impression. I for one, focus on the thousands of faithful members going about their lives trying to live their faith.
JMT | 5:41 a.m. March 3, 2009
Having played the game of politics for almost 30 years I smell a rat. IF (big IF) what "I" is saying is correct about citations I suddenly doubt the results of this study.

Could this be essentially payback for the LDS support of traditional marriage in California?

In politics NOTHING is above suspicion. If it can be done, someone will do it. And the fact that this report has the name "Harvard" associated with it means little to me. That could be a selling point for his own 'online' junk, per se.

WHY Question the results? | 5:48 a.m. March 3, 2009
For those that have concerns regarding the scholarship of this study, you can bet those concerns would not be here if Utah had be a state that was last in Pron use.

It is what it is, and that is just more of the same strange stuff regarding our Great State.
DTF | 6:15 a.m. March 3, 2009
This needs to be scutinized more heavily. the 84018 zip is for Croydon, in Morgan County. According to the US Census, Croydon have an estimated 2007 population of 158. So one subscription in Crodon is the equivalent of of 0.45 people in a town of 1000. Obvioulsy the results skew when there is even a single subscription in a zip code with a small population
Worried Mom | 6:42 a.m. March 3, 2009
Do you have any idea how many people live in the town that they have as the no. 1 zip code? Maybe there might be 50 if you count the little children. Who did he get his statistics from? Apparently, he has no idea how to figure out how to figure statistics that are realistic! It could only be 2-3 subscriptions in the whole town!
Fraud capital | 6:55 a.m. March 3, 2009
We are also the fraud capital of the United States. We would have neither the porn problem or the fraud problem if Church-members gave greater heed to what their leaders have been saying over and over and OVER for years and years and years. President Hinckley addressed the on-line porn problem regularly in priesthood sessions of General Conference. (President Monson et al will no doubt do the same.)

The counsel to keep our financial houses in order goes back even further. The "stormy weather" in the financial world forecast by President Hinckley a few years ago is clearly here.
Read more carefully | 7:10 a.m. March 3, 2009
The % of porn subscribers is quite low compared to population numbers. Also the zip codes that were the highest in Utah are where the % of non Latter-day Saints is highest. Also the article pointed out that there is less opportunities to purchase porn in retail, so the internet is used.

Perhaps if the study was done with more pertinent facts you may find out that Utah's Latter-day Saints have a much lower % than the nation's average for porn purchases.
PLEASE | 7:18 a.m. March 3, 2009
Why can't we just admit that we have a problem in Utah. Why is that so hard. The bretren have lectured the priesthood about pornography at every general confeence (except the last one). They know there is a problem. The truth is always hard to deal with because it hurts the most. Most of you are just hiding about rheteric (sp) Garden of Eden Utah is not. I have lived outside Utah most of my life. I raised my children outside of Utah and much prefer to live outside the state when it comes to living my religion. This survey is not surprising. Why does it surprise you???????
PV | 7:23 a.m. March 3, 2009
As "Look At the Zip Codes" pointed out, there is not a strong correlation between the level of pornography consumption and the LDS population. If there was such a correlation, the highest concentrations would be in Davis and Utah Counties, not Salt Lake County and the border counties.

Even so, it is an embarrassment for Utah, and a clear indication that there is work to be done in educating the population about the dangers of pornography.

Of course, critics of the LDS Church can't do much more than repeat the usual "hypocrisy" trope, because to criticize the level of pornography consumption would be admitting that it's a problem, which they aren't likely to do.
Terri | 7:52 a.m. March 3, 2009
For porn to be considered as "sweets" you obviously have not had to deal with the addictive nature of porn. It is not "sweet"! It is a consuming fire that will burn your soul and drag you down to hell. You probably will lose your job, your family, and any self-respect you ever had for yourself. If you had to watch a loved one suffer from this addiction it would be agonizing, not to mention if it was your daughter on the internet. This addiction is q cancer and it affects our whole nation. Stop looking at numbers and look at yourself. Correction comes not from statistics, but from knowing who you truly are and respecting yourself and others...need I mention the word LOVE.
Robert | 7:54 a.m. March 3, 2009
Another study reported a few years ago shows that Utah is the state with the highest percentage of population owning computers.

This is an important factor to consider when studies such as this one are based on subscriptions per the state's population and not per the state's population owning computers.

With more computer ownership, there would naturally be more computer usage, and hence online pornography.

I'm surprised the Deseret News article does not mention this.
Utes #1 | 7:56 a.m. March 3, 2009
84112, hmmmm, isn't that the University of Utah? Have the Utes finally won an uncontested #1 slot?
Jumipin' jack | 7:56 a.m. March 3, 2009
This is what happens when the public has to go through hoops to get a drink.
Knowwhat | 7:59 a.m. March 3, 2009
Look at the latest historical evidence of great minds and analysis coming from Harvard, George W. and Barry O. that tells me anything coming from someone at Harvard could possibly be insufficient.

84112, that includes the U of U, Go Utes!
Real Issue | 8:08 a.m. March 3, 2009
We have Sen. Buttars trying to defend us against the most dangerous group of people in the world, homosexuals, and other policitians trying to defend us from having to look at a bottle of alcohol in a restaurant. Meanwhile we lead the country in online porn subscriptions? "Skewd", yeah that justfies this article doesn't it folks. Perhaps the larger issue here is that LDS have a bigger problem within and don't want to address it. So they deflect the real issues to something that cannot be associated with good LDS people.

The same people subscribing online for pornography were the same people on here last week defending Sen. Buttars comments against homosexuality. That is the definition of hypocrisy folks. Alive and well in the good ole state of Utah.
Previous Stat Student | 8:14 a.m. March 3, 2009
Lets look at three underlying factors that could easily explain this:

1) Utah offers less opportunity for obtaining porn than other states (ex: less strip clubs, porn theatres, liquor stores, etc.)

2) Utah isn't 100% LDS, so anyone not LDS and starved for porn will be more likely to subscribe online as that is the easiest way to obtain it.

3) Utah carries a larger than normal stigma for porn than possibly any other state, forcing people to resign to more private means to get porn, and at home on your computer seems the most private place to get away with it.

THINK before you judge!
Fredd | 8:14 a.m. March 3, 2009
I don't know why everyone doubts this so much. I have read numerous articles stating Utah is at or close to the top in internet porn searches. My experience is Mormons (not Utonians, but Mormons) seem to be pretty open about sex. They keep it within marriage but they aren't shy about it. Not in a vulgar way, just open about it. And to those who say its the only outlet for porn in Utah, I don't think there is much competition for the internet.
Lies and statistics | 8:17 a.m. March 3, 2009
Experience tells me this "study" is pure bunk.

Everyone knows you can create a study and make it say whatever you want. This is nothing more than an opinion piece that wraps itself in the cloak of science to "prove that attempts have a morality based society are futile".

Do we have a problem with porn in Utah? Absolutely. But trotting out some study to show that a few zip codes within our state have high subscription rates is just a fluff piece to sell headlines and push a political agenda.
Anon | 8:23 a.m. March 3, 2009
I haven't read the WSJ editorial on the study, but I smell a Harvard rat. By the way, porn isn't addictive to mormon men simply because they are "repressed" mormons. It's addictive and attractive to men because men are genetically coded to enjoy it. Part of our responsibility in mortality is overcoming that hard wiring.
Spin | 8:24 a.m. March 3, 2009
Ok, you have convinced me. Mormons don't look at porn. It is all of the non-mormons. Good arguments people. I should have known. Mormons are good at spinning information. Look at the history of the church and all of the spin they put on that. They are just spinning this information as well.
LDS living in California | 8:25 a.m. March 3, 2009
Typical Utah Mormons! LDS living in Utah and outside of Utah are completely different. Utah Mormons take the church for granted! Live what you preach!
Anonymous | 8:25 a.m. March 3, 2009
Baloney. This is pure nonsense.
Rick | 8:30 a.m. March 3, 2009
Two of the zip codes are in the Salt Lake area. is not that area 65% non Mormon?
Nyal D | 8:32 a.m. March 3, 2009
The argument that the porn is higher in ZIP codes that have smaller percentages of members and so proves that Mormons don't look at porn as much is flawed. Since the rest of the universe is overwhelmingly Gentile, and their usage rates are still lower, one must conclude it is NOT just the Utah non-members ruining it for the rest of Utah Mormons. Also, how in the world is porn dangerous addicting, poisonous, or anything like that? I have seen plenty of porn in my life, I haven't married a man, beaten my wife, or eaten an unhealthy amount of babies.
True? Possibly... | 8:42 a.m. March 3, 2009
Actually, it's probably that the Utahns don't know where to get free porn, eh?
lol | 8:47 a.m. March 3, 2009
I loved this quote from the researcher, "But users who do attend religious services tend to shift their adult entertainment sessions to other days of the week than the day of services."

Nice.
Perspective | 8:49 a.m. March 3, 2009
According to the article that means that 0.547% of people in Utah use this service. That is significantly less that 1% of the population.

In most states it is much easier to buy hard-core pornography at a local adult bookstore. To be honest with you I am surprized given Utah's strict anti-pornography laws that the number is not much higher.
SJ | 8:52 a.m. March 3, 2009
I'm not surprised at the story. I've always beleived that Utah had some of the best people and some of the most troubled people in the world. Whereever The Lord's best people are, there will be Satan's best workers as well.
ohmygoodness | 8:52 a.m. March 3, 2009
The "flawed" study would have been right on the mark if it had found Utah had usage rates comparable to Idaho.

Who cares what total consumption is from all sources?

The fact that statewide over five households per 1000 with broadband have a subscription is something to be concerned about, or not. It's crazy that people are arguing that Utahns are less into porn than the study indicates when the point is we're into porn.
Mark | 8:53 a.m. March 3, 2009
The percentage of Mormons to those of other faiths or no faith at all is less than half in Salt Lake City. Let's look at the numbers people, we are talking 5 people out of every thousand are subscribing to online Porn - how does that prove that it is faithful members of the Mormon faith subscribing? As many other's have pointed out the internet is virtually the only place to get this type of smut in Utah so naturally the figures will be higher here and in other states where it is difficult to get porn in retail locations. Porn is a problem even among Mormons and the church leadership warns against it and does everything it can to combat it but this study does not prove that "Mormons" are big porn users or that Mormons are hypocritical!
Plot them out | 8:53 a.m. March 3, 2009
If one plots these zip codes out they make more sense (although I am not sure what make Severe so high on the list). Number 2 is U of U campus etc. Let's not assume that this is a Mormon thing. Some of the areas have much fewer LDS than the rest of the state.
Alex | 8:55 a.m. March 3, 2009
LDS living in California | 8:25 a.m. March 3, 2009:

"Typical Utah Mormons! LDS living in Utah and outside of Utah are completely different. Utah Mormons take the church for granted! Live what you preach! "

That is not my experience. I don't have a problem with Utah Mormons. I have problems with Utahns that ought to be Mormons, but are afraid to be. It is the fence-sitters and the disaffected that I have more of a problem with. Unfortunately, "what happens in Utah, stays in Utah". This means that Utah is a great place to flout commandments, because the LDS faithful in Utah will always have to pick up the tab for it. For some who are disaffected or critical, that is quite a bonus to their racket.

Some of the best people I have ever known in my life are and were Utah Mormons, and yes, I have lived in Utah before. Some of you out of state LDS should consider what you are doing when you indulge in the "Utah Mormon" digs. It is the faithful in Utah that end up taking the heat, not the hypocrite. The real hypocrites dont care.
LIES | 8:57 a.m. March 3, 2009
OOOOh a study from a University who teaches global warming, and liberalism. I'm sure this study is on the up and up.

Harvard has zero credibility on social issues.
weak study | 8:58 a.m. March 3, 2009
This study is flawed. Look at the 5 zip codes mentioned and there are about 100 households per zip code. If 1 person has a subscription, it would totally skew the data.
Speaking For Myself | 8:58 a.m. March 3, 2009
I guess I am not as smart as many of you because where you can speak in broad strokes, I can only speak for myself.

In that regard, I am LDS. I try every day to do better than I did the day before. I believe I can one day overcome all the trappings of temptation, of hate, of greed, of selfishness and will some day be free of all of that, but for now, I am very pleased with my progress.

I do not have any subscription to any pornographic publication or site and I have no desire to ever go there. As you have guessed I am nothing special. Just your average everyday person who has seen the disease of pornography infect many homes. It is dangerous and sad at the same time. Yes it is made to peak our curiosity, but we do not have to give in to it, and by not giving in to it we do not have to feel wound up or deprived or repressed or suicidal or postal. We just occupy our lives with more productive and less destructive things. Never give up. Make strides everyday. Love your spouse totally.
Cool_with_Us | 8:58 a.m. March 3, 2009
I personally think that this might be true. I live in Utah so I would no if something was up. I actually no a few people that do watch it.It's a very weird thing to do. To tell you the truth we should DRIVE OUR OWN BUS!
Not getting into every bodies business. Its the truth, I personally hope that people shouldn't be so dang hyprocritical. But that's just my opinion. Maybe the percents are true, so what? Let them live their own lives. It's not our business to point people with those problem's out. It's their life. LEAVE THEM ALONE!
mother of a "son of helaman" | 8:58 a.m. March 3, 2009
I live in Northern Utah and found this article very imformative. Instead of jumping on "the defense" let's take a look at our own homes. Check your child's history on your home computer and take care of it. You never know what you might find. Protecting our children from porn is a major trial of the last days. But it is possible.
SteveS | 9:01 a.m. March 3, 2009
Man I can't believe all the people who are so intent on poking holes in this study! It seems to me that they are really having trouble coming to terms with the data collected. I've said it already that some of the connections the scholar makes between conservative and religious states and their rate of payment for porn online per capita could be suspect, but please remember that this was a national study of all states, not just Utah, and the same methodologies were used in collecting data from Utah as they were for all other states. Undoubtedly there are lurking variables influencing the data in Utah (such as access to brick-and-mortar porn stores), but those lurking variables and others are influencing the data in all other states as well.

The fact remains that people (LDS, non-LDS, etc.) are _paying_ for porn online at a greater per capita rate than any other state. Anyone who's been online recently knows how easy it is to access porn for _free_ in great quantities; it's amazing to me that people actually _pay_ for the stuff, especially if they fear being discovered by others.
Richard | 9:01 a.m. March 3, 2009
Did anyone else notice that the researcher took information from a SINGLE top 10 provider of online porn? What kind of cross section is that?

Judge not that ye be not judged.
drawing conclusions | 9:02 a.m. March 3, 2009
I awlays find it interesting when the shouts of "addicted to porn" begin. Many people enjoy so-called porn in responsible fashion just as many from the state travel to Nevada to gamble in responsible fashion or to Idaho to play the lottery in responsible fashion. Regular porn viewing does not equate with addiction.

People with addictive personalities get addicted to many things that end up have a devastating effect on their lives and the lives of their families be it carbs, prescriptions, alcohol, cigarettes, porn, even exercise. I've never seen a public movement to shut down religion just because a per centage of users take it to an extreme.

Let's focus on studying the addictive being and work to find solutions/cures rather than picking and choosing which addiction choice to legislate against.
Paul | 9:03 a.m. March 3, 2009
Utah is always in the news constantly for the most perversion anywhere. Polygamy, porn, child abuse, animal abuse and whatnot. You people need to be taught good human values. God help Utah.. enough of the devil there!
BC | 9:04 a.m. March 3, 2009
Regardless of whether the study is flawed or not, it is definitely a problem, not only in Utah but everywhere--not only with non-LDS church members but with church members as well. Otherwise, the church leaders would not be warning us about it in every general conference. It is the gateway drug, so to speak, of much larger offenses, and we are told that it is even more addictive than drugs. If Utah is high in online porn subscriptions, you can bet it is high, probably even higher in free porn on the Internet, since Utah is the freebie state.
OlderThandirt | 9:05 a.m. March 3, 2009
Hey Sen. Valentine--why don't U jump on this one and build a wall around the entire state? ADD(was ADS) is #1 here, sugar consumption via ice cream, soda, candy is enormous her. Why not act on some of the things that are everyday "real hits" on the behavior of kids as they grow up. And, if U don't want the little ones to see a liquor bottle--go to another resturant..oh, now that's a novel idea. LOL
confession | 9:09 a.m. March 3, 2009
I will own up. Living in Utah due to this being where my extended family is and where I could get a job, the majority religion culture drives me crazy so I find relief in having not one, but seventeen porn site subscriptions. I rarely check the sites, but get great satisfaction from knowing this day would come and y'all would get in a dither.

I consider it money well spent.

lol
Mark | 9:11 a.m. March 3, 2009
Do some Mormon men look at porn? Yes. Are they subscribing to it and paying for it with their credit cards so their wifes can see the charges? I very much doubt it. Why do we have to turn everything into Mormons against non-mormons in this state. Can't we look at a study like this (despite it's political agenda) and say "what can we all do to combat something that is damaging to our society".
RPC | 9:11 a.m. March 3, 2009
Privacy --

Sex isn't considered "bad and evil" in Utah. It's considered sacred by Utah. (Or, at least, a lot of people living in Utah). If you had something that you held sacred, would you want to make it filthy and common?

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

previousnext

Latest comments

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

How soft can you get, did Max really hurt your feelings that bad?

Marriage definitions vary widely

I don’t see that maintaining a tradition of a 5000 year old definition...

What Hall said was classless. There is nothing wrong with being angry about...

Poor, poor Ute fans. Boohoo. Maybe your "coffee" will make you happy. Hehe.

I want Mr. Will to take a look at the Wikipedia entry on Cannabis. It is less...

In response to Larry, it is possible to define all four words he mentions....

@ hypocrisy - why don't YOU explain how this joke of a travesty of a "health...

Didn't they have boats and servants in Eisenhower's and Nixon's day when the...

As a graduate of BYU, who has friends and family who are fans of the UofU, I...

BYU, Utah game highlights

Oh brother, could your comment possibly be any WHINIER and LAME??? How do u...

Advertisements