Published: Friday, Feb. 13 2009 1:07 a.m. MST
"they will hurt him within the Utah Republican Party and in the Legislature"That is sad, true but sad in Utah.Gov. Huntsman is facing
reality, times have changed!
First of all, any domestic partnership that grants *financial* benefits to gay
couples, friends, or whoever is a bad idea. If businesses are obliged to offer
insurance to such relationships along wih offering them to spouses then they may
just opt not to cover any relationship at all. That would be perfectly legal.*** Political pundits say Huntsman, after winning his last run for the
governorship by a record-setting majority last November, is repositioning
himself for the national stage. ***Setting himself up for what?
Surely not president. On that score what does Huntsman have that Mitt Romney
doesn't? Both are Mormon, which doesn't help nationally. Both are further to the
left than the overall GOP, but Romney had an excuse: he had to run in
Massachusetts. Romney is a manly man; Huntsman is an effeminate fop. Both are
the sons of privilege, but Romney has his own genuine accomplishments to point
to, while Huntsman's "accomplishments" consist of political appointments
purchased with daddy's contributions to the GOP. And speaking of those
contributions, Huntsman's daddy has spent the last decade given hundreds of
thousands to both parties, which, whatever Jonny, Sr. says, is really just about
Progressive, moderate, conservatives, are the future of republican party. As
the world becomes more complex the "antis" (intellectual, abortion rights,
environmental, gun control, climate change, evolution, illegal immigrants, etc,
etc.) are becoming increasingly irrelevant. Moderates like Huntsman grudgingly
get most of the right wing nut vote, and appeal to moderate republicans,
independents, and even a few liberals. I think Huntsman is looking past the
Utah State legislature and is definitely positioning himself for a national
office. He has all the prerequisites, money, charm, smarts, looks, family , etc.
If he can just convince people he's Episcopalian, he's got it made!
Bernick obviously has not been paying attention to Huntsman's political stances.
Huntsman has supported this issue for some time but it's only been focused on
now (which, in itself, says something).Huntsman did not bring the
issue up. While being interviewed by a reporter on a different matter Huntsman
was asked if he supported civil unions. As he has before, he stated "yes" and
the interview moved on. He could have side-stepped the question, but did not
think it was a big deal because this issue was old news. For some reason, the
press just never took notice before.
I think that the Common Ground initiative is making a strategic mistake by
expanding the scope of its reforms beyond same-gender couples. Proposing
marriage-like benefits for siblings and inter-generational relations is vaguely
incestuous and just gives ammo to the cretins who say things like "if gays can
marry, why can't I marry my dog?".The best thing for gays and
straights and the institution of marriage is to leave marriage alone, but just
treat gender like we do race and religion--as no basis to tell a loving couple
that they can't marry. Problem solved.
Smart politician.He knows America is sick to death of far-right lunatic
Limbaughites clamoring for Civil War.
I hope that Gail Ruzicka, Chris Buttars and the yayhoos at Sutherland are all so
mad they can't sleep.Way to start facing reality and looking forward,
Governor Huntsman. Well done, Sir.Michael in Sandy
He's laying the predicate for his run for the presidency.
Huntsman has courage.Knows his church has Church/State limitations.It's what made America great.
Anonymous | 7:43 a.m.Yes, I'm sure that was EXACTLY what Gov
Huntsman was thinking.Hint:Quit projecting YOUR opinions onto
others and claiming that's what THEY are thinking.
Wow!A liberal governor in the reddest of red states.There IS a
A different perspective on Governor Huntsmans position:The unholy
transgression of homosexuality is either rapidly growing or tolerance is giving
it wider publicity. If one has such desires and tendencies, he overcomes them
the same as if he had the urge toward petting or fornication or adultery. The
Lord condemns and forbids this practice with a vigor equal to his condemnation
of adultery and other such sex acts. . . . Again, contrary to the belief and
statement of many people, this sin, like fornication, is overcomable and
forgivable, but again, only upon a deep and abiding repentance, which means
total abandonment and complete transformation of thought and act. The fact that
some governments and some churches and numerous corrupted individuals have tried
to reduce such behavior from criminal offense to personal privilege does not
change the nature or the seriousness of the practice. Good men, wise men,
God-fearing men everywhere still denounce the practice as being unworthy of sons
of God; and Christs church denounces it and condemns it so long as men have
bodies which can be defiled. LDS President Spencer W. KimballGail
Ruzicka, Chris Buttars, and the Sutherland Institute should be applauded for
Can you say Sec of Commerce?I guess Huntsman gave up on running for
US Senator as a Republican from Utah (Although he could switch parties and run
as D). He'll never get nominated by the convention delegates now.I
think the timing has nothing to do with supporting gays and more about
positioning himself to be Obama's Sec of Commerce.He's now the
likely bi-partisan, yuppie, green, gay supporting choice who has money.
We keep telling you there is a God. He also considers homosexuality a sin. I
though you would want to know that since you are referring to Him.
"Quit projecting YOUR opinions onto others and claiming that's what THEY
are thinking."This is what the far-right in Utah has been doing for
years. And they don't think people have caught on to it.LOL!
"God consideres homosexuality a sin"Don't be absurd.God
loves everyone and everything.It is only man who embraces hatred and
a hatefilled, unhappy lifestyle.
Way to go Huntsman!Anything that can be done to draw attention to
the nasty far-right neocons of Utah is a plus!
Better read your Bible a bit more closely. God loves all of us inspite of our
sins. It is our sins He can not tolerate.Those who justify whatever
they do as good because it is what they do are those who make your kind of
"God loves everyone and everything."I agree with the "everyone"
part, but God does not love "everything." (See Proverbs 6) That would mean that
God loved good and evil, which isn't the case. God only loves that which is
good, uplifting, holy, and true. It is precisely because he does love
"everyone" that he doesn't love "everything."The fundamental problem
in our world today is that people try to make God into a changeable being to
suit their own desires and purposes. "They seek not the Lord to establish his
righteousness, but every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his
own god, whose image is in the likeness of the world . . . ." (D&C 1:16.)Let us not walk in our "own way" and be subject to the lament that "ye
have sought all the days of your lives for that which ye could not obtain; and
ye have sought for happiness in doing iniquity, which thing is contrary to the
nature of that righteousness which is in our great and Eternal Head." (Hel.
13:38.) The unvarnished truth is that homosexual relations are
sinful and will not lead to happiness.
Judge not lest YE judged.(emphasis on YE)That's a pretty clear
warning from God it seems to me.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.— About comments