Comments about ‘Gitmo detainees return to battlefield, Pentagon says’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In World & Nation
- LDS Church organizes first stake in India
- Why did Bill Clinton defend Mitt Romney's...
- What's this? Obama longs for GOP rival like...
- Video games, porn hook young men, with sad...
- Stalled job growth rattles U.S. economy
- Accusations of anti-Romney bias spark a media...
- NY cab crash kills driver, Utah tourist,...
- Changing fortunes in 2012 race as May jobs...
Most Commented
Across Site
In World & Nation
- Court: Heart of gay marriage law...
79 - Glenn Beck: Living large in Texas, and...
79 - Mitt Romney says he won't draw focus to...
50 - LDS Church organizes first stake in India
41 - Accusations of anti-Romney bias spark a...
39 - Mitt Romney clinches GOP nomination...
32 - Video games, porn hook young men, with...
30 - Poverty, hunger among retirees increasing
25






"....pose no security risk and should be released". Yah right! If they are in Gitmo they are there for a reason, and it's not because they were poor unfortunate souls who just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. It is time we woke up and realized that this war on terrorism IS a real war, and we can't protect our nation by just looking at the world through naive, rose-colored glasses.
Gee ... freed from Gitmo and they still want to kill us?
Who'd a thunk it?
Is anyone suprised these terrorists go back to the battlefield to kill more innocent people? What does is Obama thinking he is doing, freeing innocent victims? Liberals never understand our enemies and this proves it! Now more innocent people will be murdered by these thugs, compliments of Obama!
Gee..... what'll we do? Guess we should leap over our own laws and just kill 'em all. The right wingers love throwing our weight around so we can look real tough to the world. Yea.
I'm certainly glad the Brookings Insitute doesn't run our Defense department.
250 bullets correctly placed. Either let me do it or send me the bill.
One thing Bush got right was the fact that we are in a war with radical islam.
In WW2 the US would have interrogated these scumbags and then executed them. But, we are so much more refined today, we interrogate them and then tell them we are sorry for so doing. Then its off to fight us again. All this niceness will come back to bite us in the butt.
RE: Slade | 1:43 a.m. Jan. 14, 2009
"It is time we woke up and realized that this war on terrorism IS a real war, and we can't protect our nation by just looking at the world through naive, rose-colored glasses. "
Naive- having or showing a lack of experience, judgment, or information
Have you fought in this "real war". What experience or information are you using to come to this conclusion?
RE: Ridgerunner | 1:56 a.m. Jan. 14, 2009
"Is anyone suprised these terrorists go back to the battlefield to kill more innocent people?"
What battlefield? Innocent people? If you mean US soldiers, they aren't innocent, they're legitimate military targets who are acceptable to engage in a "real war".
"Liberals never understand our enemies and this proves it!"
Your comments only prove that you don't understand our enemy and apparently based on the current administrations foreign policy I would have to say the republicans don't either.
RE: Mama | 4:51 a.m. Jan. 14, 2009
"The right wingers love throwing our weight around so we can look real tough to the world."
One sided view. Review your recent history objectively. The dems love tossing our weight around just as much.
RE: Chip | 5:15 a.m. Jan. 14, 2009
"I'm certainly glad the Brookings Insitute doesn't run our Defense department. "
We would probably be better off. The idiots there right now don't have a clue.
RE: KM | 7:03 a.m. Jan. 14, 2009
"In WW2 the US would have interrogated these scumbags and then executed them."
How many intelligence officers from WW2 have you talked too? What history book did you read that said during WW2 our service men cast aside their morals and due process?
"Then its off to fight us again."
Carried a gun into combat lately? You must have. You speak like you actually have to face off with these people.
I am astounded at the claims that people are willing to make without any real factual basis. This day in age we are given instant access to hordes of information at our finger tips yet people still choose to make a judgment based on emotion, hearsay, urban legend, Hollywood movies...etc. Everything but the facts.
RE: The solution | 7:06 a.m. Jan. 14, 2009
"250 bullets correctly placed. Either let me do it or send me the bill."
What unit do you serve with? What federal agency do you work for? Clearly, you've never had to take a human life. It's easy to play tough guy from the lazy boy.
Oh good, ONLY 87 terrorists (???)
Tough decision, Obama has promised to close it down, but now that he is getting all of the information, has found out that he can't close it down without endangering more lives.
I guess that once Obama gets all of the same information the Bush has had, he will end up being Bush's 3rd term, not McCain.
Of course they will seek out militant groups. Love or hate. Do we negotiate or fight. Thinkers and those who want real, positive change for the absolute good for you, me and this planet (mother earth)...they negotiate. High school bully mentality haters with low iqs jump right on in to kill. Love or hate. If nazis had put you or me in death camps complete with torture and all that goes with it, we would want revenge also. Of course they will seek out militant groups. That's what we get for allowing nazis to run this country for eight years... hate returned.
Did not know where they were what they had done but could tie them by using fingerprints and DNA that is quite something.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments