Reader comments
Judge orders release of 5 terror suspects at Gitmo

9 comments   |   Read story

Anonymous | 11:09 a.m. Nov. 20, 2008
Here's another Bush inspired learning moment. If we had given these captives due process in the first place there won't be no legal standing to release them. One more Bush failure.
Its about time!!! | 11:49 a.m. Nov. 20, 2008
The Judicial Branch of the government is now telling the administration exactly what the electorate told them on Election Day in 2006 and 2008; that subverting the time honored traditions, practices and Constitution of this country is wrong and simply won't be tolerated.
Brother Chuck Schroeder | 12:50 p.m. Nov. 20, 2008
Sooooooooooooooooooooo a Judicial Activise Judge, and a federal judge at that,wants to "fight a war" does he or she, from The Bench, and remove this from The President now?, and has ordered the release of five Algerian terror suspects who have been held without charges almost seven years at Guantanamo Bay, however, these prisoner's have to BE DEEPORTED out of this Country, called America (not amerika) yet, and NO OTHER COUNTRY really wants them, that's why they were held there. So, seeing this Judge, wanted them free, why NOT he or she adopt them, taken them under their wings, and let them stay at their home 24/7, until a country if found?. Or better yet, let Obamacon, adopt them, and, let them babysit his kid's, for them, in the guest house, while Obamacon is running around the world 24/7 again, trying to save it from a world wide depression, they created while in Congress, until he stumbles on a small Country, like Cuba, Mexico, Russia, China, that'll take them there?. Either way, they should of kept them there at "Club Gitmo." That Judge was wrong here and knows it.
Comments continue below
Lewt the leftist liberal | 1:04 p.m. Nov. 20, 2008
The Bush Administration has stated Guantanamo Bay must remain open in order to protect us from terrorists. Ironically, by trying to decrease terrorism through these detention facilities, we have actually accomplished the exact opposite. The families who the detainees leave behind are increasingly vulnerable to terrorist recruiters and often join the fight against the nation that wrongfully detained their father or brother. How do we expect other nations to adhere to the Geneva Conventions and respect human rights when we ourselves do not? If our enemies captured any American - military or civilian -would we want them treated in the same despicable manner as our Guantanamo detainees? Thankfully, President-select Barack Obama has stated he will close Guantanamo Bay and ban torture by the American military, thus ending these atrocious human rights violations.

Bush did it | 3:53 p.m. Nov. 20, 2008
The release was constitutional. Bush was forced to back off. Don't pin any of this action on Obama, he is not in office yet.

Bush blew it, and the courts are saying so. Any idiot would know that holding people like this is wrong

Ship them back to their countries. Sorry, guys, but you get them back. What you do is not our concern. They did not belong with us, so here, take them. Tough world out there, but... that is the way it is.
Don't get it | 5:25 p.m. Nov. 20, 2008
For the life of me, I can't understand why you liberals don't believe we are at war! What is it going to take to convince you? These people are not innocent victims of GWB! They are terrorists and they want to kill you! Turn them lose and they might succeed! But Obama doesn't believe we are at war either, so here we go. Brace yourself America, here they come unopposed and with no consequence of their attempts to murder innocent people! But hey, maybe they will vote democratic!
Just For The Record... | 5:30 p.m. Nov. 20, 2008
The U.S. District Judge in question is Richard J. Leon, a Bush appointee.

Isn't the Constitution wonderful in the checks and balances it brings to our democracy.

Thank goodness the judicial branch has finally found its backbone and is exercising its Constitutional prerogative by telling the Executive Branch that what they've done is not only wrong but unconstitutional as well.

If you call that being an activist judge then I say we need all our judges to be activists!

Free at last..... | 7:26 p.m. Nov. 20, 2008
Until the Israelis take them out.
Re: just for the record | 7:40 p.m. Nov. 20, 2008
You make good points but the judges need to be held accountable for abuses of power too. The less power anyone in a governmental position has, the more free law abiding citizens will be. According to some of our founding fathers, they believed this new government would not work if citizens would not govern themselves. They warned that if we ever got to a point where we would not govern ourselves, we would be destined to be ruled by tyrannts. In the opinion of some, that time is close as evidenced by activist judges overturning elections. No one can say that hasn't ever happened, it has happened and is about to again in the case of Prop 8 in Ca.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Advertisement
previousnext

Latest comments

STOP blaming the Democrats, BLAME THE REPUBLICANS FOR 8 YEARS DOING NOTHING...

The best way to break the law is to become someone who enforces the law.

It's a real shame so many folks have never gotten out and gotten to know the...

It's all talk... you do not have any evidence for your claims. You assume...

Maybe if you could bat .408 in the major leagues, you too would be paid a...

I prefer the “Wizard of Earthsea” quartet by Ursula Le Guin, an...

Water wars in Snake Valley

The bottom line question that no one can possibly answer is; what will be the...

It looks to me like special treatment.

Jazz will have a tough week, with what should be a easy win against the...

I am very excited for this game. As much as I want the Utes to win, it won't...

Advertisements
Advertisement