Reader comments
Utah Utes football: Team now No. 7 on BCS list
121 comments | Read story
Where do you guys get off thinking you are world beaters when you consistently play such weak competition???
The human polls should have Utah ranked ahead of USC now. Their schedules are comparable, and Utah is undefeated and beat Oregon State who beat USC.
With Oklahoma playing Texas Tech and Alabama playing Florida, two of the teams ahead of Utah are guarenteed to lose.
I'm not saying the Utes deserve to be #1/#2 right now, but they should be in the conversation. Unfortunately the conversation ends at #6 USC and never moves to #7
It's not that I have "no" in my heart, it's just that I really don't think the Utes could beat all but 6 teams in the league if they played this week. Baby steps are appropriate. It stinks that outside forces are giving them more than they asked for.
SDSU will be little more than a tuneup for Utah before the showdown next week.
The rise in BCS ranking, though nice, is inconsequential at this point. Utah doesn't stand a chance of getting into one of the top two spots to play for the national championship, and Boise State doesn't stand a chance of passing Utah in the BCS standings as long as Utah wins out.
Utah's best scenario for winning their BCS bowl is facing the winner of the Big East or ACC. They won't stand much of a chance of beating USC, or any of the teams from the Big 12 or SEC.
BYU finishes at #34 Air Force and at #4 Utah.
TCU finishes vs #34 Air Force.
Boise State finishes at #136 Idaho, at #68 Nevada, vs #76 Fresno St.
If Utah wins out, they'll stay about the same in the computer rankings, but rise a little in the human polls, to 4th or 5th in the BCS standings.
If BYU wins out, they'll rise considerably in the computer rankings and in the human polls, to 10th or 11th in the BCS standings.
If TCU wins out, they'll rise a little in the computer rankings, a lot in the human polls, to about 11th or 12th in the BCS standings.
If Boise State wins out, they'll drop in the computer rankings, but rise a little in the human polls, to about 7th or 8th in the BCS standings.
Bottom line: Utah needs to win out, or Boise State needs to lose (at Nevada probably) for the MWC to get the automatic BCS bid.
Ball State will lose one of their final two games.
Go Utes!
It appears that since Utah broke into the BCS, after this year, things will have played out pretty evenly.
Even with a national 8 game playoff somebody would be on the fringe or left out.
If we had 32 teams a playoff would be great, but with 119..........please. Somehow,somebody will always be left out who's fanz think should have got
in.
Look at the Big 12 South. Possibly 4 of the top 10 teams in the country come that one division of a conference.
I think the WAC should find better competition to play, and that would take care of their problem.
Much as I hate to say it, I like the controversy of the current system. If you understand the BCS ranking system it's not that far off reality. Most people have a problem with the computers.
Maybe the WAC can have a playoff with Conference USA..........I hear there is another 10-0 team over there who is looking for credibility.
Big joke suggests that the all high and mighty SEC or other eastern conferences are just brilliant. Please. If you watched the LSU - Alabama game this weekend you saw the number 1 ranked team in the nation barely slip past a number 6 LSU that (granted, Lee is not the first string quarterback) couldn't make a pass to save its life. Yet Bama couldnt' take advantage. Both defenses only appeared strong because of their inept offenses. It was a race to the bottom on both sides.
Now, that might just have been a single game. But anybody watching with a knowlege of football knowns either team would have lost to a Boise State that day (just as an example). And there it all ends... anymore, on any given Saturday, any team in the top 25 might beat any other team.
That's why only a playoff system will work. The eastern conference schedules being so tough - that's just a bygone perception.
I would base that on the BCS rankings..
GO UTES!! Thursday was one of the best College games of the year!!
Oh and BTW Every conference has their weak sisters! The MWC has had a great year!
Also, the yewties are frauds. They have only legitimately won 7 games. The other 3 were lost by the opposing team due to mistakes. This is unlike what the mighty cougars did against teams with last minute drives (not second chance drives), blocking field goals (not missed field goals), etc. etc.
Look out yewties, the mighty cougars are coming. They will score on your "vaunted" defense. TCU has them well prepped. BYU is not the least bit concerned about the yewties hapless offense. Your Crowton-wannabe OC will surely screw this up for you.
Final Score:
BYU 42, Utah 12 (all field goals)
BWA HA HA HA
I hope Boise and Utah both get good BCS bowls and get to play good, ranked opponents (SEC, Big12)
I believe if that happens it will be Hawaii-Sugar Bowl all over but hopefully not.
If they get slaughtered I most hope it shuts people up for a year (fat chance)
The BCS envy and whining about not getting due respect in the polls is soooo wearying.
Be aware, however:
It really is impossible to compare teams without overlapping opponents very well. MWC/WAC tend to measure themselves against Pac10 and that is (always but esp this year)a faulty guide. There is no substitute for week in and week out playing tough opponents. When you watch two SEC or Big12 teams struggle with each other it is tempting to say you could do better but that is a misleading impression. The proof comes in Bowl games where 3-4 loss SEC teams chew up 2 loss teams from weaker conferences.
You should look at the Oklahoma-TCU game as a hint of what a BCS bowl will be like for WAC/MWC.
Hope I'm wrong.
Beware, sometimes you get what you wish for.
Under the current format, a playoff between the MWC/WAC champion wouldn't make any difference in getting a team into a BCS game unless neither conference had a team finish in the Top 12 in the BCS standings (or Top 16 if they finish ahead of a BCS conference champion.
In either case, the MWC and WAC don't deserve to be playing in a BCS game if they don't have a team good enough to finish in the Top 16.
Then again, no team (BCS or non-BCS) deservers to play in a BCS game if they aren't ranked in the Top 16.
You're an embarrassment to all that Bronco has done to restore the glory and tradition that is BYU football.
I disagree with nice gesture that Utah has no chance against the university of spoiled children and/or the big 12. The Utes have proven to be over achievers against better competition this year. That is what has made them so exciting to watch this year. Kyle, given enough time can prepare against anybody, His bowl record proves that.
Rivals predicts the Orange bowl against the NC Tarheels. THAT would sinch an 8-0 bowl record. I'll take it! (Hard place for fans to get to though)
The BSC league leadership is morally and intellectually bankrupt and would be quite happy to have the MWC/WAC champion create their own Bowl game and be shut of us. The BCS leagues control the post-season bowl playing field and the NCAA seems powerless as a larger party to change it. And the non-BCS league leadership knows this as well. They too, do not have the moral and intellectual courage to support a MWC/WAC championship based bowl game, but would rather trade opportunities for a single BCS game per year.
So be happy Utes, we are the miserable but happy red-headed step-child, and should be grateful if not groveling over a single BSC slot if the team wins out.
personally i dont think byu will ever make it...
Yes, there is a high probability that USC would blow both BSU and Utah out of the water. Just like USC was suppose to blow Oregon State out of the water. However, USC didn�t blow Oregon State out of the water and on any given day BSU and/or Utah could beat USC. That�s why they play the game. That�s why the BCS needs to be dismantled for a playoff system.
i just wish that Utah would do better as a school i mean after they beat OSU the one guy was raving about how much OSU sucks if you want to make yourself look good never say that a team you barely beat on a last second drive who beat USC Sucks it makes you look bad.
>>Utah's best scenario for winning their BCS bowl is facing the winner of the Big East or ACC. They won't stand much of a chance of beating USC, or any of the teams from the Big 12 or SEC.<<
If Utah and/or Boise are in the top 12 and ranked above the highest team in the Big East (currently Pitt #22?)) & ACC (currently UNC (#16?)) Then Utah and/or Boise would go and Pitt & UNC would be SOL.
It could very well be Utah/Texas in the Fiesta and Florida/Boise In Sugar.
UNLV and New Mexico would've given the Broncos all they could handle.
You are talking the same Alabama team that thrashed preseason #1 Georgia who in turn took LSU to the woodshed?
All good teams win at least 1 or 2 ugly games where the may or may not deserve to i.e. Bama v LSU and probably Auburn or Utes v NM & TCU.
re: Get over it | 9:20 a.m. Nov. 10, 2008
>>The fact that the yewties beat OSU who beat USC means nothing.<<
How 'bout Ore St beating both UW & UCLA?
Sometimes, its better to be lucky than good. Being a breed em young fan, you know all about that, right?
As for Nov 22, it should go alot like 2004 where it'll be close for a quarter and a half before the Utes pull away.
By the way, I think they should change the way in which the BCS gives automatic bids. Every year, they should give the automatic bids to the six conferences that have the best non-conference record (with non-div. 1A not counting in the win column, but counting if the div. 1A school loses).
That way, unusually tough conferences like the MWC are rewarded for playing better than average ball, while unusually weak conferences like the Big East, are not given something they really don't deserve. Plus, it will change the current trend in college football scheduling. The big conferences will start scheduling more games with the mid-majors, in order to preserve their preeminence in receiving an automatic birth, while teams will not schedule so many div. 1 AA teams, if it means that the game can only count against their nonconference schedule, and not for it. Mid-majors would get a chance each year to prove themselves.
1. Texas Tech - having a great year, but what have they ever done in the past to be considered a national power. Most pick them to lose to OK, which should drop them below Utah.
2. Alabama - sometime in the distant past before i ever watched college football they were a power. Most pick them to lose to Fla, which should drop them below Utah.
3 - 6. All these teams have been great powers in recent years, but why do they all have losses? To me that shows vulnerability. Utah has flaws, but not in the Loss column. Utah beat TCU because they didn't make as many mistakes. We've been best at home, but I would consider the Fiesta Bowl a home game.
Go Utes!
Maybe they will, but if I were a BYU fan I would be more worried about Air Force. One of BYU's biggest problems is that they feel entitled to victories and they don't seem to prepare the way that they should.
Next week we can all trash talk and cheer for our respected teams, but this week the Utes need to avoid a trap game in San Diego and the Cougars need to come up with an answer for Air Force's run game.
Good Luck Cougars, and GO UTES!!!!
But I do know that they deserve to be ahead of Boise State. Boise State fans are almost worst then BYU fans.
They know nothing of the game, and would find things to complain about even of they were ranked #1.
Good job Cougars for the season so far, 9-1 is nothing to sneeze at, I am very excited for the big game in two weeks, but for now I am just as excited for the SDSU game this saturday.
Focus Utes, two more games to go!
You would think that with FOX involved, it would be "Fair and Balanced". I guess that only applies to their news division....
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Kyle has big rivalry history 7:49 p.m.
- Utes not changing anything for BYU 7:43 p.m.
- Varlamov blanks Sabres 2-0 7:40 p.m.
- Backcourt leads No. 13 UConn 7:38 p.m.
- Rivalry has had some 'turkeys' 7:36 p.m.
- Georgia St. beats UVU 59-52 7:27 p.m.
- Matt Reynolds vs. Koa Misi 7:24 p.m.
- Rivalry game on Thanksgiving? 7:16 p.m.
- S.L. County councilman resigns 7:15 p.m.
- Davis man sues police 7:15 p.m.
- Donny and Kym dance to victory
- Howard made the rivalry a rivalry
- Crews free man in Utah County cave
- Cougars cruise past Southern
- Loyal to Cougarettes, Crimson Line
- Twitterati to BCS: 'We hate you.'
- Y. focused on 10-win season
- BYU has slim shot at BCS
- Thunder rolls by Jazz
- Witness describes '99 killing
- BYU would like friendlier rivalry
258 - Glenn Beck to enter politics?
227 - Protests against Phoenix LDS temple
207 - RSL wins MLS Cup on penalty kicks
202 - Bronco, Kyle rubber match
139 - BYU records with win
133 - Letters: Rushing to judge Palin
129 - Boys basketball rankings
103 - Hall, Johnson matchup key
102 - Thunder rolls by Jazz
102
Wayne Howard was a lightning rod in the Utah-BYU rivalry, back when he...
I could tell BYU was ready to play Saturday afternoon even before the...
I guess the Cougars didn't want to exert themselves too much before the...
to the way it was before, when the bowls were locked down to preset...
To Mark | 2:09 p.m. Nov. 25, 2009: "Yes, when she said "there you go,...
For the first 3 posters on this topic, I think you all missed the point of...
I really don't think you will want to be at that game. You won't feel so good...
"Mark | 4:05 p.m. Nov. 25, 2009 Obama is in over his head. All he can do...
In response to the 12:43 commentator, If this is the rational and logic...
Um... Millsap?
I am so pleased with our #3 national ranking. These are games I played in...
How many Utah Freshmen does it take to screw in a light bulb? None.........
is to turn down their bowl invitations! Don't play their game, don't aspire...



The problem is simple - the WAC and the MOUNTAIN WEST CHAMPS should have a single game playoff with the winner going to a BCS Bowl. If after that game they are ranked in the 1 or 2 spot just like any one else then they can talk Nat Champs. Truth is the two leagues do deserve an auto berth even if they are one loss teams - BUt for now just ONE from both - I don't like it but it does make sense and imagine the power if both leagues went to the BCS together and agreed to a single game playoff with the winner going to the BCS - more power - great appeal and best of all everyone is still in it to the bitter end - oh and imagine the money for the two leagues to be split on such a championship game. Besides remember half of a 100% is better then 100% of nothing...