Reader comments
Jeffs lawyers seek talks with Rangers

17 comments   |   Read story

Don't you know! | 12:34 p.m. Oct. 22, 2008
Don't you know Texas Rangers are ABOVE the law? They don't have to appear when the court orders them to be questioned even if it's the law. They are the ones who ask the questions, not the other way around!

Don't mess with Texas!
Anonymous | 12:54 p.m. Oct. 22, 2008
Walker Texas Ranger?
Anonymous | 1:17 p.m. Oct. 22, 2008
i thought they meant the baseball team
Comments continue below
of course | 2:27 p.m. Oct. 22, 2008
the FLDS wants to supress all the evidence. An innocent person says "bring it on" rather than trying to keep it out.

it's like pleading the 5th. Of course you can't be made to incriminate yourself - that's a good thing - but the very fact that you invoke it says you are afraid you will get caught doing that which you were't supposed to do.

for a "religious" organization, they act more like Scientologists (trying to hide everything) than the pious lot they portray themselves to be.
zxcvbnm | 4:00 p.m. Oct. 22, 2008

What a hoot ........a defendant trys to defend themselves and everyone blocks the defense,,,,,,
nosugrof | 4:07 p.m. Oct. 22, 2008
Teenage girls who are part of plural marriages can plead the fifthe. O0f course people are accused of doing what the law has no business forbidding. If the state of Texas were interested in justice, they would indict Angie Voss
Who's hiding? | 4:12 p.m. Oct. 22, 2008
If the FLDS is hiding ANYTHING they've done a superb job, because Texas still has NO EVIDENCE of ANY abuse, and those families lives have been exposed to the gaze of 1000's.

On the other hand it appears that Texas is the hiding. What about that so called "investigation" of Rosita Swinton? or the so called "investigation" of CPS into the abuse on the women and children reported by the MHMR workers from the Colliseum. Why didn't Texas invite the media in for the raid if they were so sure they were doing the right thing? Wouldn't the media have made them heros for "rescuing" all those women and children?
WELL SAID | 4:43 p.m. Oct. 22, 2008
Who's hiding?
well said i think that texas in in for a royal inbarassment im a thinken. what do you think?
Well Said | 4:47 p.m. Oct. 22, 2008
Who's hiding?
I think yall hit the nail on the head. texas is in for a royal imbarassment i'm a thinken. what do are you a thinken?
Mike | 5:31 p.m. Oct. 22, 2008
How does ANYONE, outside those immediately involved in the case, know what evidence is or isn't there.

And as someone has already said: DON'T MESS WITH TEXAS!!!
zxcvbnm | 9:27 p.m. Oct. 22, 2008

Oh yes...the evidence.....the mysterious evidence.......the evidence that with luck and a stacked court might get admitted.
Well 393 kids and their parents are out from under court supervision.
The one girl that is detained was testified against by two women who have never set foot on the ranch.
The bigamy charges with all the "evidence may be thrown out because the bigamy law is unconstitutional. To get thing real stired up the victims may never testify against the accused.
The real hoot is that Jeffs sits in prison alreadybusted so even with a conviction on additional charges the money spent is a waste.
Wanna buy an invisible crematorium anyone?
How about an 8x10 glossy of Jeffs kissing a 12 year old?
Seen any 37 year old teenagers lately?
Yep.......give the "evidence a try" then wait for it to be thrown out..........lol
Just curious | 8:37 a.m. Oct. 23, 2008
What about the bed? You know the bed in the temple? you know the bed with the human hair on it? I thought that was supposed to mean something! I've been waiting for the other shoe to fall and, NOTHING. I've even been reading Texas" major source for news and/or evidence, The National Enquirer, and still nothing.

PS..the baseball team..that was a good one!
and remember folks, dont mess with texas, it don't need no more messing up!
Why? | 8:53 a.m. Oct. 23, 2008
Why should Texas Rangers give any interviews to Lawyers in Arizona?
Jeffs is accused of crimes in Texas, NOT arizona. And the Prosecution has already said, they wont be using any evidence in the Texas case. This is just a ploy to hold of on the trial.
Jeffs will get his turn, in Texas Courts! Then his attorneys can depose Texas Rangers.
Gal50 | 11:21 a.m. Oct. 23, 2008
Well, Jeffs is accused of crimes in Arizona. One reason for not considering Texas evidence in the Arizona trial is that it hasn't been ruled admissible or inadmissible and the hearings reviewing the evidence are going to be lengthy and probably subject to appeals. It doesn't pay for Arizona to tinker with this evidence. Jeffs' attorneys probably just want to get a look at the evidence ASAP as they want to see the entire picture. What is likely to happen in Texas in the Jeffs case may have some impact on how the lawyers deal with the Arizona case. Child molesters typically don't fare well in prison and perhaps Arizona better protects molesters. For Jeffs, it may pay to lose the Arizona case.

The reason Jeffs needs to be prosecuted in Arizona is because he may only serve eight years of his Utah sentence. More likely that he will serve a longer term since the photos of him molesting a 12 year-old were released and he committed acts like these during the period he was on the run. He thumbed his nose at the justice system. The more convictions, the less likely he will be back on the streets.
zxcvbnm | 11:40 a.m. Oct. 23, 2008

The lawyers are trying to see what influence the Rangers had on the thinking and motivation of local LE.
Local LE may have given the Rangers some credit for knowing about some things like crematoriums, dead babies, hairs in beds.......pregnant teens.
Kinda skews the objectivity of the local LE when credibility is given to persons spreadind second hand rumor from an uncredible source.
The Texas LE was getting their stuff from biased sources that have proven to have exxagerated even semi credible accusations.
Texas wants a cover-up | 8:58 p.m. Oct. 23, 2008
They don't want any AZ judge looking at what Texas is doing.

Walther is going to allow in everything. If AZ decideds first that it's not allowed, her decision would look suspect.

That's why they don't want to use it.
Interloper | 2:24 a.m. Oct. 25, 2008
As the attorney interviewed said, there is no reason for the Texas Rangers to be deposed at this time. The crimes Warren Jeffs is charged with in Arizona arose before the raid on Yearning for Zion Ranch. The prosecutors in that case already have gathered their evidence and have a trial strategy.

The other reason the court should not force the Texas witnesses to comply is that Jeffs' lawyers are likely trying to glean information to prepare for his Texas cases under the pretext of gathering it for the Arizona case. That can wait until Jeffs is tried in Texas.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Advertisement
previousnext

Latest comments

While I do not agree with Bob Bennett on everything, I do agree that the way...

Zone D giving Jazz headaches

"hee hee hee hee" Maybe it is coaching? nooooooo.....

Letters: Case of sour grapes

Right there with you guy.

There were no FLDS people on the jury. I'm sure the prosecution made...

Letters: Endless black hole

You go guy. So true.

Vatican looks to heavens for aliens

once mankind makes contact with intelligent life on another world its going...

Dont blame the refinery for the city allowing the building too close to it.

While on the one hand there is freedom of association for which I feel...

As an active LDS member with gay friends and relatives, this is a great step...

Letters: Will wrong on warming

The planet heats up, it escapes into space. Who woulda' thunk. Get over...

Advertisements
Advertisement