Comments about ‘Arizona court declines Jeffs' appeal to have charges remanded’

Return to article »

Published: Friday, Oct. 17 2008 12:00 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
realitycheck

of course they will challenge evidence from Texas. That's a good defense attorney's job - to protect their client.

And since the evidence includes their client sticking his tongue down a 12 yr old's throat, I'd try to get it out of evidence too.

Harold aka Tex

realitycheck: As I have been admonished by several FLDS members there is no evidence that his tongue was down her throat. I could care less where his tongue was how ever you look at it to a NORMNAL person it is SICK, SICK, SICK!

realitycheck

Of course the FLDS say "there's no evidence". Their boy is in prison.

Just the fact that they believe he's a prophet - and that being a "prophet" is handed down from father to son - puts their judgement in question (to be polite about it).

If I say my dad was a prophet and so now I am one - you think I could get a lot of people to follow my rules, especially the crazy ones? So sad that people can be so gullible. I guess being isolated and told something since birth, then you'll believe anything.

I'm most amused that they believe this pedo is a prophet but think dinosaurs never existed. Now that's funny.

Thinkin

Jeffs will be free soon

When a cow jumps over the moon

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments