Reader comments
Many selling at loss to avoid foreclosure
74 comments | Read story
Who forced her? That's a pretty bold statement with nothing to back it up. Short of any evidence that shows she was forced, one would be inclined to believe that Ms.Hernandez made some poor financial decisions that resulted in her inability to make a promised payment.
I guess that doesn't sound as good as "forced" or "crisis", huh?
This is lazy reporting which shifts the blame of a defaulted loan to... no one.
Almost two years and an overseas tour later we almost did just that. However we where able to move into Base Housing and then we had too much house.
Living with your relatives is not a good thing, which is why we had a housing boom after WWII. A GI being able to buy a house with little or no money down.
My wife was able to buy our 1st house on her own. Later in Hawaii I finally used my GI Bill Benefits and have the house I own now. Which lost $45,000 in value but is still worth almost twice what I paid for it.
I think prices are adjusting to what they really are as opposed to what they where inflated to be.
I understand the compelling personal reasons for getting an ARM but when the ARM Kicks in they want an ARM and a leg.
Now people are upside down and taking a loss when they try to sell.
Oh, you mean you bought the house intending to resell it at a fabulous profit in 18 months?
Oh, you mean you bought the house and then refi'd to take money out when the house appreciated quickly?
Oh, you mean you bought a house with no money down, negative amortization, and a variable interest rate, and you can't afford your current payment?
Last year my wife and I sold our house in MA at a loss. We were living well within our means when we made the purchase. It was just a bad time to sell, but we were "forced" to, due to a required job change and cross-country move.
Some might decry poor personal money management, a factor here, nevertheless it saddens me to think of this couple nearing 60, to have such financial problems after their children have been raised.
I agree with "Name" 100% If the house was a good deal when you bought it then why is it not a good deal now? Simple, because you found out the house down the street is selling for less and you got greedy!
"But the increase in short sales and foreclosures has contributed to the decrease in home prices along the Wasatch Front and the rest of the state, he said." (Per Dave Anderton of SLC Board of Realtors.
The decrease in home prices in SLC is a good for society and eventually the economy. Of course real eastate agents do not like that.
This real estate bubble in SLC will bust just as much as the rest of the "World" real estate bubble is bursting.
Amazing how drunk with greed and desire to have a "Big" house has hit SLC citizens. The house flippers have had a good time and bragged continually about the money they made.
Now collectively the 401K statements of September 2008 reflect this bust. And those sparty pants flippers are complaining on how much money they have lost in their 401K.
So on to greater adventures. There is a law of cause and effect that cannot be violated. It never has and never will. "NEVER" . SO. BE. IT. 41CADILLAC
What happened here was someone that was loaned 100% or more of the value of the home. It is the bank and customer who listened to the bank who are at fault here.
Every one of them will give you the sales pitch about how much safer they will be with an agent "representing" them. When the agent lets them down (after collecting an unrealistic commission), they should have accountability along with irresponsible lenders and buyers.
With inflationary prices out of control from artificially increased housing values the agents continue to receive commission based on inflated values of homes, further driving the costs up. The work is the same on two home sales; yet the agent gets so much more money for selling the higher priced home. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see this is a flawed system.
Shame on investors too. They greedily gobble up affordable houses that owners could buy and improve themselves. They're "flipped" and affordability disappears.
No one asked for this market to collapse. Even the smart guys got caught as well. They are living in bigger houses with values dropping just as fast.
Do your best to be happy and work hard. It's easy to complain. Be different.
I've been married 16 years, have 4 children and no home of my own because I KNEW IT WAS NOT AFFORDABLE for us, under our circumstances. It may not be possible for several more years. I'm not after the life everyone else has; I do what I think is right for me and my family -- and consider the cost.
Why is everyone a "victim" in the subprime meltdown? Except for those nasty "predatory lenders" who apparently make you take on a bad mortgage at gunpoint?
When my wife and I bought in February of this year, it was a real pain getting approved. Our credit was not perfect. But my re-enlistment bonus was seasoned funds, right on the barrelhead, and we paid some debts off while securing a fixed-rate loan on a MODEST rambler in a MODEST suburb in a MODEST incorporated area up by Hill AFB.
The key here is that my wife and I knew, before going into it, exactly how much we could afford to pay each month, and we never let ourselves look above that.
Half the reason we have so many people losing homes, is that they used NO COMMON SENSE when selecting a home to buy. Duh. If you can't afford a $3,000 monthly payment why are you looking at a $375,000 house???
The reason for the sub-prime mess is clear and simple. "Greed". Most everyone living on God's greeen earth want to get a good deal. The problem is that some people will force it, lie to get it, manipulate others, etc.
I don't fault Elevia (and others in her situation) for wanting a better life and a decent home. All of us do. However, I would expect that along the way, she got bad advise, used bad judgement, got taken advantage of, and so forth. She has learned a painful lesson.
The real bad actors in this mortgage mess are probably not so much the Elevia's of the world, but the government policy makers, brokers, lenders, real estate agents, speculators, that pushed and lived off of sub-prime loans.
If no one would lend the Elevia's of the world more than they could realistically and reasonably repay, things would be a lot different.
So I've been asking myself for years; how can these people who make less money than us afford new homes? Is there some secret I'm missing? Sad this lady was led to believe she could own a home, but it really is a dream for some (maybe most?) folks.
My frugality, hard work and wise purchase will be great when our home is paid for in 7-8 years. I guess people don't want to hear what is really required to be an American homeowner - they want it all free and quick; twice the size of what I've worked so hard for, for half the price.
I wish people would stop blaming banks, lenders, termites, realtors, government, jobs, illnesses, and every other conceivable entity or happenstance for their inability to honor their commitment to pay for the debts they freely accepted. Where's the line of people who made thousands of dollars during the BOOM by listening to greedy lenders and want to pay back the money they made?
Needless to say, these companies kept on calling me and trying to convince me to take out a $700,000 mortgage on my property and buy more properties. I didn't take them up on it, because I thought that was too much risk.
In a portion of these foreclosures, these predatory lenders are to blame because they took advantage of ignorant, unintelligent people who had no idea how to go about purchasing a home. These people were not taught by schools or parents how to purchase a home. They relied on their lenders.
Crooks!
Another friend instead is batling the payments because she was told the interest was fixed and trust the realtor when reality was.. it's variable.
In this stormy times, realtors are out fishing for their own benefit.. as usual.
The short sale gets them off the hook better than a renter that is evicted for not paying rent who is likely at least three months behind. The short sale does less harm to their credit rating than the evicted renter. In addition their monthly payments have been lower than if they had rented the same home.
Worst of all, it is possible for these folks to have someone come in and buy(not a friend or family, but anyone else) the property at the short sale price, and then turn around and sell it to the original owner, whose credit has not been harmed by the short sale, at the lower price. This is going on all of the time.
There are many sympathetic stories out there. These two are not among them.
Words mean things. Forced means things. Taking the less painful option of short selling vs. foreclosure isn't being forced, it's making a better decision based upon the choices offered to you.
She chose the better option, but if she would have just forced herself to do some due diligence she would have been OK.
Incidentally, if the house was was represented to be in better condition than it actually was the law provides recourse and any real estate agent worth his weight in skin would have assisted her in that recourse.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Stocks tumble at open 7:59 a.m.
- Storm pounds Utah for 2nd day 7:54 a.m.
- Fierce snowstorm heads to Midwest 7:41 a.m.
- EU: Jerusalem should be joint capital 7:38 a.m.
- Obama talks job-creating initiative 7:37 a.m.
- Iran: Nearly 200 protesters arrested 7:13 a.m.
- Obama envoy begins trip to NKorea 7:12 a.m.
- Baghdad blasts toll at 118 dead 7:11 a.m.
- High school girls basketball: Top 20 1:40 a.m.
- High school swimming rankings 1:28 a.m.
- Witness: Mitchell stalked victims
- Cougars going back to Vegas
- Utah/BYU rivalry can be more civil
- Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing
- TCU to play Boise in Fiesta Bowl
- Bring the true spirit of Christmas
- Utes excited to go to San Diego
- Winter weather is here to stay
- BYU professor remembered
- TCU's BCS game missing something
- Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing
262 - TCU to play Boise in Fiesta Bowl
203 - Letters: Global warming a lie
166 - Cougars going back to Vegas
147 - Utah/BYU rivalry can be more civil
135 - George lost in rivalry hatefest
119 - Ed Smart 'appalled' at testimony
100 - Harpring's NBA career is over
97 - Utahns want health care reform bills
80 - Utes excited to go to San Diego
78
Amazon.com, Target.com, Sears.com, Walmart.com, Kmart.com and...
Let's black top the rest of the county. Put in plastic grass and fake trees,...
Why can't Bronco say Max made a poor decision? Isn't that what it was?...
If we change the composition of the atmosphere do we really expect...
Here's hoping Ute fans can take Bronco's advice and move on...
I am all for suspending Max Hall from the team...... after the bowl game.
After the Giacoletti fiasco, it will take five years of good basketball to...
No doubt, TCU should be playing either Texas or Alabama. I'm sure TCU would...
the only joke is you!
Las Vegas is for the 2nd place team (BYU) and San Diego is for the 3rd place...
To Josh M. It is quite easy to "stereotype" BYU as a school. There is a...


