Reader comments
Will public-lands rules be changed?

3 comments   |   Read story

Dave | 7:27 a.m. Oct. 11, 2008
Hooray for the Bush administration.
Geezer | 7:52 a.m. Oct. 11, 2008
The rule the Bush appointees are trying to repeal comes from Section 204(e) of the Federal Land Policy & Management Act of 1976. It was written in to take care of situations where the Secretary of the Interior might refuse to use his withdrawal authority to protect lands of great public value. That's exactly what happened when Kempthorne refused to protect the Grand Canyon. He should be following the law, not rewriting the rules.
Doug Brewer | 5:25 p.m. Oct. 12, 2008
Lord, protect us from those claiming they're protecting us. Good for the Bush Administration!!

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Advertisement
previousnext

Latest comments

Wes Mathews! Yeah!

who cares the real games are this wk not tucked away on somebodies else's...

My husband has been an umpire for years and spends months in the sun. He...

Keep Mathews and Fess and Maynor! Dump the rest of the overpaid bums and...

One thing I now know for sure. The rest of the Mountain West Conference now...

What bishop of Kanab are you talking about? The first one or the last one?...

Adding truth serum to her cereal

We are all dumber having read your comment.

Wow, some of you are quite critical of teachers. I have serious criticisms...

If that is the approach, to declare this a medical procedure, he is still...

Thank goodness for the international students who give us variety, help us...

Advertisements
Advertisement