Reader comments
Arsenic in geothermal pools becomes issue

6 comments   |   Read story

Is common sense too much to ask | 11:09 a.m. Oct. 2, 2008
Pools should't be held to drinking standards, and neither should there be clorination required if the water is continually recycling as most natural spring pools are.

Can we ask for a little common sense from our regulators?
Don't Drink the Water | 11:47 a.m. Oct. 2, 2008
Gee, how about simply posting a sign that says Don't Drink the Water. Then everyone would be happy and healthy. The government beaurocrat gets to feel important, the law is complied with, no one gets sick, the hot spring doesn't get condemned, and no expensive treatment needs to happen. A $2.00 solution!
No drinking water regulations? | 7:53 a.m. Oct. 3, 2008
It's amazing that some people in Utah -- who just lived through a major epidemic of cryptosporidiosis last summer -- would believe that pool water shouldn't be drinkable.

Virtually everyone who got sick last year got that way because THEY DRANK CONTAMINATED POOL WATER. EVERYONE, especially kids, drinks some pool water while swimming; it's unavoidable. And every one of these pools had recirculation and filter systems that "recycled" the water.

Now, I can agree with the argument that water which contains only 3 or 4 parts per billion of arsenic isn't particularly dangerous to swimmers. But if we're going to require operators of man-made hot tubs to obey the regulations, then operators of natural hot springs shouldn't be exempt.
Comments continue below
D'oh! | 1:28 p.m. Oct. 3, 2008
who drinks HOT spring water? Ick.
More idiot lawmakers | 4:16 p.m. Oct. 3, 2008
I don't think poster #3 gets it.

Quote: "But if we're going to require operators of man-made hot tubs to obey the regulations, then operators of natural hot springs shouldn't be exempt".

There's a huge difference here- the natural spring water is "recirculated" if you will on a much grander scale. The man made hot tubs re circulate the same water on a very limited scale.

I love hot springs. Life is risky. Why don't people understand that we don't have to legislate everything- including rediculous safety regulations like this one.
soutah | 11:38 a.m. Oct. 9, 2008
The average piece of chicken contains more arsenic (6-9 times) than EPA standards allow. It's because of the industrial garbage fed to chickens. Go veg!

"Government researchers found that the amount of arsenic in the chicken samples greatly exceeded the Environmental Protection Agency's upper safety limit of arsenic allowed in drinking water. In fact, the amount of arsenic found in the chicken was six to nine times that allowed by the EPA."

Lear more by googling arsenic and chicken.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

previousnext

Latest comments

Cousin, I feel horrible for what happened. The fact that they had him out...

happened because people/voters respected Lavell. Congrats, coach.

Edwards to receive NCFAA award

There is no question on what Lavell did for BYU football program. Great...

John was one of the most incredible individuals that I have ever met. He was...

Rob, agreed. She does deserve one. But sometimes in situations like this. The...

Man trapped in Nutty Putty cave dies

My family and I are so saddened to hear of the outcome of this story. Our...

My grandfather, Mack Bateman, was one of the survivors of the accident. He...

re: byu turkeys | 5:49 p.m. Nov. 26, 2009 our BEST EVER PLAYERS completely...

Meanwhile the real kids are caught in the middle. What about them?

Utes not changing anything for BYU

when you play an inferior team (than your team), there is no need to...

Advertisements