Comments about ‘EPA sets Yucca radiation standards’
Reid, Matheson call 'lowered' number risky
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- Charges: Runaway teen caused accident that...
- Growing pains: Rate of young men struggling...
- Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
33 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
25 - Vets heart Mitt: Romney enjoys big...
17 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
14 - Poll shows Utahns think Legislature's...
14 - Man shot brother while showing him...
13






Wow! Rep. Matheson must either be a fast reader or have someone on staff, qualified in health physics or related science, to be able to proclaim that the revised radiation standard for humans 10,000 or more years from now is too weak.
For his information, the current (underlined) dose limit for a member of the public is 100 millirem per year: the same level as proposed in the revised Yucca regulation
Senator Reid and Representative Matheson need to go back to high school and learn some science. As the article points out, you can get 15 millirem radiation exposure from a single x-ray, and the average radiation people get from natural sources every year is 20 times that number. If you live at higher altitude, as in Salt lake, you are getting even more exposure to cosmic radiation, and if you live near the granite of the mountains up on the east bench, your exposure to radiation from uranium is even higher. Radioactive elements in coal smoke are worse. People who live in Spokane, Washington, get 1200 millirems per year from natural sources. If Matheson is worried about radiation exposure to people, he should WANT to move the spent nuclear fuel AWAY from cities and rivers, like the Indian Point power plant upstream of New York City, and put it deep underground, where only small amounts can ever escape. The aquifer under the Yucca Mountain Site is NOT used by any large number of people. It is 90 miles from Las Vegas, and is not connected to Vegas groundwater. Mankind will never be harmed by the waste in Yucca.
Yucca Mt. is not a Bush/McCain plan. Research into safety concerns and other issues started about 25 years ago. Unfortunately Reid spins his resistance as a partisan difference, when it actually seems to be a regional one. A national imperative to produce more energy is more important than regional or political agendas. Lets overcome objections and obstacles that naysayers use to impede progress! I hope the next President can overcome Harry Reid's resistance to a plan that is far better than the alternative proposal to leave nuclear waste spread out across the country.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments