What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- Charges: Runaway teen caused accident that...
- Growing pains: Rate of young men struggling...
- Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
33 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
25 - Vets heart Mitt: Romney enjoys big...
17 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
14 - Poll shows Utahns think Legislature's...
14 - Man shot brother while showing him...
13






I do remember reading an article that it is possible to "burn" highly radioactive waste in a reactor and use most of it up, thereby reducing the amount of radioactivity.
If this is possible, why do we insist on burying it?
I worked on the Yucca Mountain Project for 10 years and saw most of the scientific data first-hand. I'm sure the repository will be safe.
Harry Reid and the Nevada delegation used to say "let science decide," but they turned from that years ago. Now they want political posturing to decide the fate of the nation's much-needed and expanding electricity that is generated by nuclear power plants. The anti-Yucca Mtn pseudo-science generated by the state of Nevada has fallen flat every time, as it should.
Reprocessing is extremely expensive today and not really feasible at this large scale. Experts say that will change, and Yucca Mtn will become a temporary parking lot.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments