Reader comments
LDS Church posts statement on alcohol
196 comments | Read story
About time, isn't it? | 12:21 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
I'm so glad the Church has spoken out. At last the legislature will know
what to do.
xscribe | 12:46 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Didn't know that state policy was governed by the LDS church. Is the State
that has control over the state, or is it the church? As others have said in
the past: Maybe the LDS church's tax-exempt status should be looked into.
Religions shouldn't rule all | 1:06 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
In times past the LDS church has tried to prohibit alchohol consumption period,
not reasonably regulate it. They opposed the repeal of prohibition. It was the
state of Utah who was the state that overturned prohibition. They also
encouraged a law that was passed in Utah years ago that forbade shopping on
Sunday. We no longer have this law.
Certainly reasonable restrictions are welcome, but religion should not be allowed to decide such laws. Not just the LDS religion, but any religion. Laws should be based on common values and logic, not peciluar religious rules.
I wouldn't want Moslems telling my daughter to wear the tents they wear, or not to get an education. I wouldn't want Catholics to make it so birth control isn't available. I don't suppose that non LDS appreciate it when the LDS try to enforce their rules by force of law.
If alcohol is to be restricted, let public safety and health be the reasons and motivations. Not the fact that alcohol is "evil". Only this way will we get rules that protect society and at the same time allow people the benefits of responsible drinking.
Certainly reasonable restrictions are welcome, but religion should not be allowed to decide such laws. Not just the LDS religion, but any religion. Laws should be based on common values and logic, not peciluar religious rules.
I wouldn't want Moslems telling my daughter to wear the tents they wear, or not to get an education. I wouldn't want Catholics to make it so birth control isn't available. I don't suppose that non LDS appreciate it when the LDS try to enforce their rules by force of law.
If alcohol is to be restricted, let public safety and health be the reasons and motivations. Not the fact that alcohol is "evil". Only this way will we get rules that protect society and at the same time allow people the benefits of responsible drinking.
Comments continue below
Song of the South (and North) | 1:39 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Nothing brings out more ignorant comments from politicians and the public than a
discussion on changing Utah's alcohol laws. Try coming to some counties in
Texas or other places in the country and buying a drink. If it is so important
to you to be able to buy a drink, why don't you move? You might want to
educate yourself a little beforehand because you might end up in a place with
stricter alcohol laws than Utah.
dave4197 | 1:45 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Thanks to the LDS church for a clear and strong statement. Certainly we believe
in our freedome to make choices, but with choices come consequences. So the
legislature should set some heavy consequences for bad behaviors, should require
rigorous proof of age before purchase, and should require testing before turning
the car key. And wrap in other mind numbing substancees besides alcohol, that
are rampantly abused by some in our midst. It's an opportunity for
constructive change.
Tom | 1:59 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
So where's the problem? The Church itself has no voting rights whatsoever.
Those members who agree with the church's positions, vote in
representatives to make decisions/laws that reflect their personal views.
What's wrong when those representatives in the State congress, vote in
accordance with the wishes/desires of his/her constituency? This is how a
republic is supposed to work.
There are checks and balances to this. Like the constitution and the court system.
There are checks and balances to this. Like the constitution and the court system.
Here we go again | 2:00 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Why would anyone with a brain drink alcohol? Why not hit yourself in the head
with a hammer everyday, the effects are about the same? To drink yourself into a
stupor and think you are having fun means you never had any real fun! Has there
been anything that people do to themselves and each other that has ruined more
lives than drinking alcohol? The world would be better off if alcohol was
banned! Self distruction in a bottle!
Bryan | 2:36 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
"Religions shouldn't rule..." - I agree with your conclusion that
alcohol consumption should be regulated according to public health and safety
standards and concerns. I disagree with your premise that in the past it has
been regulated because it is considered "evil." I think that's a
superficial assessment. Neither the LDS church nor its doctrine has ever called
alcohol evil, just as Paul never called money evil.
The LDS Church's statement itself cites health and safety concerns related to alcohol consumption. In a religious context, the constraint on drinking alcohol was given precisely for health and safety reasons: "adapted to the capacity of the weak, and the weakest of all saints."
The LDS Church's statement itself cites health and safety concerns related to alcohol consumption. In a religious context, the constraint on drinking alcohol was given precisely for health and safety reasons: "adapted to the capacity of the weak, and the weakest of all saints."
msgelter | 2:54 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Is someone not reading for comprehension here? The Church's statement is in
favor of LOOSENING the liquor laws as they now stand. (Why do you think the
Hospitality Association is HAPPY with the statement?) It says that the church IS
in favor of regulations to protect the health and safety of the public, but that
people should have the free will to choose whether they drink or not.
And I'm really tired of the "damn Church is running the State" whining. We live in a DEMOCRACY. The laws are proposed and passed by the majority; and whether you like it or not, the majority of the state is LDS. Move to Ohio, and you'll have to deal with a state where Catholics are the majority and run the state accordingly. Same with Baptists in the Deep South. No one is "dictating behavior"; but the prevailing moral attitudes of the majority shape the legislation that determines state law.
By the way, if you still think our liquor laws are draconian, move to the Midwest, or some areas of the South. Utah is an Alcohol Paradise in comparison.
And I'm really tired of the "damn Church is running the State" whining. We live in a DEMOCRACY. The laws are proposed and passed by the majority; and whether you like it or not, the majority of the state is LDS. Move to Ohio, and you'll have to deal with a state where Catholics are the majority and run the state accordingly. Same with Baptists in the Deep South. No one is "dictating behavior"; but the prevailing moral attitudes of the majority shape the legislation that determines state law.
By the way, if you still think our liquor laws are draconian, move to the Midwest, or some areas of the South. Utah is an Alcohol Paradise in comparison.
criminal bar owners | 3:27 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
When one of your family members is killed by a 4th time drunken driver.
You don't care who tries to change the Beer and Liquor laws. Anyone selling alcohol to a drunken driver should be charged with criminal activity and the so called 'Bar' should be sued out of business.
You don't care who tries to change the Beer and Liquor laws. Anyone selling alcohol to a drunken driver should be charged with criminal activity and the so called 'Bar' should be sued out of business.
Dennis | 3:56 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
State policy is NOT governed by the church. It is governed by the people. In any
state can find a particular group of people who might lobby for change to suit
their values or beliefs, religious or not. You just happen to live in a state
where there are a large number of people who share a common set of values.
BTW, I believe, LDS or not, that liquor is the common base for almost ALL crime and tragedy in our lives and that makes it evil. Liquor is the 1st step toward drug use and all of the crime that accompanies drugs. People who commit most assaults, especially family violence are almost always drunk. How many deadly car accidents are caused by drunk drivers as opposed to sober. I strongly believe "responsible drinking" is an oxymoron and that there is no such thing. Drinking causes far too many people to lose their ability to be responsible. I would like to see it abolished and made completely illegal. Of course, the loss of tax moneys would be staggering. That industry has a strangle hold on even the non drinkers.
BTW, I believe, LDS or not, that liquor is the common base for almost ALL crime and tragedy in our lives and that makes it evil. Liquor is the 1st step toward drug use and all of the crime that accompanies drugs. People who commit most assaults, especially family violence are almost always drunk. How many deadly car accidents are caused by drunk drivers as opposed to sober. I strongly believe "responsible drinking" is an oxymoron and that there is no such thing. Drinking causes far too many people to lose their ability to be responsible. I would like to see it abolished and made completely illegal. Of course, the loss of tax moneys would be staggering. That industry has a strangle hold on even the non drinkers.
SpySmiley | 4:04 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Wondering: If the Catholic or Baptist churches, or the Jewish community, issued
statements on alcohol regulation in Utah, would the Deseret News fall all over
itself in reporting it? What would legislators say?
I know the "church" is dominant in Utah, but this statement on alcohol consumption and the manner in which the News and others responded certainly shows the "church" controls state government.
Wondering: If the "church" forbad horse riding in Utah what would be the reaction of the legislature? Goodby horses.
I know the "church" is dominant in Utah, but this statement on alcohol consumption and the manner in which the News and others responded certainly shows the "church" controls state government.
Wondering: If the "church" forbad horse riding in Utah what would be the reaction of the legislature? Goodby horses.
Anonymous | 5:11 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
People get on the LDS church for making the laws... last time I checked, it was
the responsibility to elect officials for the state. If you don't like how
they vote, then don't vote for them. Vote in a catholic, Jew, a Gay,
whoever you choose.
...and for most of you in the state who didn't vote, but still want to complain about how our legislators run the state... well guess what... you didn't vote, so you don't get to complain.
...and for most of you in the state who didn't vote, but still want to complain about how our legislators run the state... well guess what... you didn't vote, so you don't get to complain.
Confused | 5:21 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
RE: Religions shouldn't rule... I'm just a tad confused about what
the "benefits" of responsible drinking are? The definition of such
"benefits" undoubtedly vary from person to person, as does the amount
of alcohol consumed in relation to onset of impairment. The individual who was
driving drunk and hit my brother and his young family head-on 7 years ago
probably considered himself to be reaping the benefits of a "little"
buzz as he rounded the highway corner in the wrong lane. While it is
inappropriate for any singular religion to dictate law, sober common-sense and
social responsibility (vs. individual pleasures) should prevail in civic
decision making. Unfortunately too many people these days feel a sense of
personal entitlement to behave in ways that not only put others at potential
risk/harm but set poor (and oftentimes embarassing) examples for our youth - all
because they want to experience a good time or even just relax after a busy day.
Regular aerobic exercise will create a "high" that will ultimately
yield greater physical and mental results...why not experience the
"benefits" of that? :-)
What? | 5:41 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Hey "Religions shouldn't rule all" what the heck is a
Moslems...you mean Muslim, if you are going to bash a religion, at least have
the spelling right...and what about the Catholic church in Italy...right they do
not hold any influence.
Alcohol destroys lives | 5:44 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
A year ago my second cousin was crossing the road with his wife and his very
young two children. A truck with a drunk driver hit them going about 50 mph.
His wife and children died, he was in the hospital a very long time.
My mom and younger brother were going to the post office when a drunk driver ran through a stop sign and slammed a second car (filled with little kids going to the beach) into my mom. When I arrived, it was like a bomb had gone off with glass and little kids. My mom's neck had moved so much they found lipstick on her shirt.
My wife's grandmother (who raised her) was an alcoholic. She was embarrassed as a child because she would her find grandmother out lying on the sidewalk having soiled herself.
I know two co-workers who had 14 year old daughters that got drunk at parties and then got raped. Now those two girls have SERIOUS issues.
To the silly person who says that the tax-exempt status of the church should be revoked, SHAME ON YOU!! The church has an obligation to speak out on issues that affect the community.
My mom and younger brother were going to the post office when a drunk driver ran through a stop sign and slammed a second car (filled with little kids going to the beach) into my mom. When I arrived, it was like a bomb had gone off with glass and little kids. My mom's neck had moved so much they found lipstick on her shirt.
My wife's grandmother (who raised her) was an alcoholic. She was embarrassed as a child because she would her find grandmother out lying on the sidewalk having soiled herself.
I know two co-workers who had 14 year old daughters that got drunk at parties and then got raped. Now those two girls have SERIOUS issues.
To the silly person who says that the tax-exempt status of the church should be revoked, SHAME ON YOU!! The church has an obligation to speak out on issues that affect the community.
meg | 6:15 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Religions shouldn't rule all--
What do you mean when you say " responsible drinking"?I know many so called " responsible drinkers,"who are alcoholics, and have ruined their families. Yet they deny the truth. They think they are " responsible".
What do you mean when you say " responsible drinking"?I know many so called " responsible drinkers,"who are alcoholics, and have ruined their families. Yet they deny the truth. They think they are " responsible".
Paul in MD | 6:18 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
In an earlier article on the debate over the regulation changes, it was stated
quite clearly that the Church's input was given after a request by the
government. They asked for input from a large number of groups and
institutions.
The Church doesn't dictate to the government. It states its opinion (quite a bit less forcefully than some other churches in many areas, actually), and leaves it to government to decide what to do.
"Religions shouldn't rule all" says the restrictions should be based on health and safety issues. If you'll actually read the statement the article talks about, you'll see that this is all it says. There is only one sentence that says anything about morals, and I quote "One of the functions of religious leaders in a democracy is to add their moral voice to issues of public importance."
After that, the statement never mentions moral issues, just health and safety concerns. So where is the problem?
The Church doesn't dictate to the government. It states its opinion (quite a bit less forcefully than some other churches in many areas, actually), and leaves it to government to decide what to do.
"Religions shouldn't rule all" says the restrictions should be based on health and safety issues. If you'll actually read the statement the article talks about, you'll see that this is all it says. There is only one sentence that says anything about morals, and I quote "One of the functions of religious leaders in a democracy is to add their moral voice to issues of public importance."
After that, the statement never mentions moral issues, just health and safety concerns. So where is the problem?
New Yorker | 6:35 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Lots of bitter statements. Lots of drinking going on here in the great state of
New York. Maybe those that are bitter ought to think about relocating somewhere
else. Everything that is perceived as bad in Utah is always blamed on the
church. Maybe there should be a mandate that only anti or non Mormons be
eligible for public office.
uncannygunman | 6:46 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
As much as I hate the idea that the church's approval is necessary to
progress in this area, I am glad that the church appears to have green-lighted
the issue.
Now just do it--it's really pretty simple. My biggest fear is that the legislature will use the opportunity to take one step forward and two steps back.
Now just do it--it's really pretty simple. My biggest fear is that the legislature will use the opportunity to take one step forward and two steps back.
CB | 6:49 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
I thought it was the will of the majority of the people. When most of the laws
were enacted the majority of the state was of the LDS faith, so it is natural
laws were associated with that faith, or believe. Its not the church that runs
the stste it's the people.
States Rights | 6:49 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
For those who can't grasp the concept of democracy and majority rule, the
LDS church isn't telling government what to do. By clarifying its position,
the large numbers of LDS voters in the area can feel confident that they
wouldn't run afoul of their religion if they were to support a political
stand.
But I think these people know that already and are just using this as another opportunity to grind their ax.
Why do anti-religious bigots choose to live in places where religion is a strong part of the culture?
Wouldn't common sense have them go where they would be happier?
That is the whole reason state governments have such autonomy, so that like minded people can enjoy a government that reflects and enforces their own belief system.
This has nothing to do with the LDS church or any church.
There are red states and there are blue states, and that isn't just a voting map, laws differ in states according to the belief system of the majority of their citizens.
Then again, some people just aren't happy unless they are tearing down someone else. Maybe that's it.
But I think these people know that already and are just using this as another opportunity to grind their ax.
Why do anti-religious bigots choose to live in places where religion is a strong part of the culture?
Wouldn't common sense have them go where they would be happier?
That is the whole reason state governments have such autonomy, so that like minded people can enjoy a government that reflects and enforces their own belief system.
This has nothing to do with the LDS church or any church.
There are red states and there are blue states, and that isn't just a voting map, laws differ in states according to the belief system of the majority of their citizens.
Then again, some people just aren't happy unless they are tearing down someone else. Maybe that's it.
Enforce the laws striclty | 7:00 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
I'm in full agreement with people being allowed to consume alcohol.
However, when they are impaired and they commit a crime or cause an accident,
etc. They should be punished to the fullest extent.
Anyone who drinks and drives and causes an accident resulting in the death of another should be tried for premeditated murder.
Driving drunk is no different that walking into a large crowd of people with a handgun, closing your eyes and then firing in all directions randomly thinking you are not going to shoot anyone.
Our politicians are by far the most "spineless" when it comes to making and enforcing drunk driving laws. If someone wants to drink alcohol, drink all you want, but don't endanger the lives of innocent people around you by driving drunk.
Anyone who drinks and drives and causes an accident resulting in the death of another should be tried for premeditated murder.
Driving drunk is no different that walking into a large crowd of people with a handgun, closing your eyes and then firing in all directions randomly thinking you are not going to shoot anyone.
Our politicians are by far the most "spineless" when it comes to making and enforcing drunk driving laws. If someone wants to drink alcohol, drink all you want, but don't endanger the lives of innocent people around you by driving drunk.
Know your history | 7:03 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Dear xscribe, it was the mormons that came to this neck of the woods and created
this beautiful city that we all enjoy, alcohol or not. There is a reason that we
have a great interest in what happens or doesn't happen here. No my
religion nor anyone elses for that matter, should dictate what everyone does.
But asking the LDS church not to care what happens here or not to get involved
is a little much. Don't you think?
BobP | 7:15 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
When about 70% of the population of any area / state want something one way or
the other they usually get it.
Ryan | 7:20 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
The private club membership is, and always has been, really stupid. I
don't drink, and I don't condone drinking, but the private club thing
needs to stop. It's embarrassing for our state.
That said, however, should it lead to an increase in drunk driving incidents, then it should be brought back in a hurry.
On a personal note, drunk drivers are scum, and no punishment is too harsh for them.
That said, however, should it lead to an increase in drunk driving incidents, then it should be brought back in a hurry.
On a personal note, drunk drivers are scum, and no punishment is too harsh for them.
Linda | 7:20 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
I am not so sure that there is a way to drink responsibly. Certainly my life
would have been better if alcohol were never a part of it. I would have to say
that at times alcohol can take a nice respectable person and turn them into a
complete monster and some one gets hurt. I still have to deal with the issue of
what happened to me when alcohol consumption turned a friend of mine into a a
complete @#$ and my life changed forever.
Kentucky | 7:22 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
It kills me to read all of the posts with the bashing of your State's most
prominent religion. Several of you act as if Utah is the only State that has
restrictive laws regarding alcohol and shopping on Sunday. Kentucky and several
other states actually have "Dry Counties" where NO alcohol can be sold
anywhere. Also, as early as 2006 there where over 30 counties that still had
"Blue Laws" which restricted shopping on Sunday.
It always amazes me to see how such "small mindedness" is still alive and thriving.....
It always amazes me to see how such "small mindedness" is still alive and thriving.....
Bob | 7:25 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Be Careful. Alcohol is a mind numbing chemical that destroys lives. Quit
whining about "Church vs State."
Think scourge on society, including, atheists, mormons, babtists, catholics and anyone else dumb enough to drink or unlucky enough to be affected by loved ones or drunk drivers who do.
Think scourge on society, including, atheists, mormons, babtists, catholics and anyone else dumb enough to drink or unlucky enough to be affected by loved ones or drunk drivers who do.
anon | 7:33 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Isn't it interesting that even a statement that most non-mormons approve of
still brings on more Mormon bashing!
When the church comments on moral issues, it is bashed for "trying to run the government." When it does not comment on things that someone thinks it should, it is bashed for NOT taking a stand.
When the church comments on moral issues, it is bashed for "trying to run the government." When it does not comment on things that someone thinks it should, it is bashed for NOT taking a stand.
Beliefs don't matter | 7:41 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
I'm LDS and I've never had a sip of alcohol in my life. That said, I
would vote to remove the private club laws if given the chance. Heck, I've
even bought a drink on occasion for my friends who don't happen to be LDS.
How could I do this, you ask, if drinking is against my religion? That's
not the important question. The real question is this: Is it against my
FRIEND'S religion? No? Then bottoms up!
Anonymous | 7:48 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
msgelter - you are incorrect - we do NOT live in a democracy! We live in a
representative republic, which is wholly different from a democracy. I hope and
pray we NEVER live in a democracy. That would be the end of this country as we
know it.
Religions don't "RULE" | 7:48 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
I used to live in Loma Linda, California, headquarters for the Seventh Day
Adventist Church.
You could not buy a Beer at any convienence or grocery store. No bars, and we got the mail on Sunday, from the United States Postal Service.
Community governments have the right to make laws that are congruentwith the values of that communities.
As you try to slam the church for their opinion, remember, they are not telling you that you need to have any certain belief pattern, or do any type of ritual. They are only looking out for the best interests of the community as a whole, and they have that right through speech, as found in the first ammendment.
As non-LDS, we took that into account when we came to this state with our families, and like the fact.
For those of you who want to turn SLC into the streets of Deadwood, So. Dakota during the goldrush, I don't see the need for the majority of people, including myself, to bow to your bullying demands and taunts, which are silly and inane.
Utah is a nice state to live and raise a family. I like that.
It comes with the territory.
You could not buy a Beer at any convienence or grocery store. No bars, and we got the mail on Sunday, from the United States Postal Service.
Community governments have the right to make laws that are congruentwith the values of that communities.
As you try to slam the church for their opinion, remember, they are not telling you that you need to have any certain belief pattern, or do any type of ritual. They are only looking out for the best interests of the community as a whole, and they have that right through speech, as found in the first ammendment.
As non-LDS, we took that into account when we came to this state with our families, and like the fact.
For those of you who want to turn SLC into the streets of Deadwood, So. Dakota during the goldrush, I don't see the need for the majority of people, including myself, to bow to your bullying demands and taunts, which are silly and inane.
Utah is a nice state to live and raise a family. I like that.
It comes with the territory.
JOHNJ | 7:48 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
I KNOW THE EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL AND THE DAMAGE THAT IT CAN DO FIRST HAND AFTER
THREE FAILED MARRIAGES AND NUMEROUS RELATIONSHIPS. THE FAILED SUICIDE ATTEMPTS
AND NOW TO THE ONE OF THE MOST DIABLING THINGS THAT CAN HAPPEN TO THE HUMAN
BRAIN AND BODY CEREBELLAR ATAXIA. LOSS OF EQUALIBERIUM PARALIZATION AND IN A
WHEELCHAIR FOR LIFE. I DID THIS TO MYSELF I ACCEPT IT.
SO WITH ALL GLAMOR PEOPLE TRY SO HARD TO PUT ALCOHOL AS BEING FUN AND THE THING TO DO.
WISE UP AND LOOK AT YOUR LIFE AND ASK YOURSELVES DO I WANT TO BE DEAD, ALONE, OR MESSED UP PHYSICALLY IN SOMEWAY AT THE AGE OF 52.
SO WITH ALL GLAMOR PEOPLE TRY SO HARD TO PUT ALCOHOL AS BEING FUN AND THE THING TO DO.
WISE UP AND LOOK AT YOUR LIFE AND ASK YOURSELVES DO I WANT TO BE DEAD, ALONE, OR MESSED UP PHYSICALLY IN SOMEWAY AT THE AGE OF 52.
Re: xscribe | 7:49 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
So you think the LDS Church should lose its tax exempt status? Have you
researched this subject or just throwing out more uninformed opinion? In the
last 50 years the IRS has only investigated two churches regarding tax exempt
status. The LDS church was not one of them. If the IRS was to take on the LDS
Church over this issue there are at least a dozen other churches that would have
to be investigated for their political activities. Ever notice where Hillary
and Obama gave most of their speeches on Sunday during the campaign?
Mike | 7:53 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
msgelter - sorry, I forgot to add my name to the post. I hate anonymous snipe
postings.
JOE J | 7:54 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
THE L.D.S. IS RIGHT.
Frustrated | 7:59 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
I agree with "Enforce the laws striclty" requarding spineless
politicians. The two issues for me and they should be for lawmakers are safety
and accountablity. When laws are enacted they should ensure the safety of the
public. Does making liquor easier and cheaper to get, make roads safer? I think
not!
Does making liquor easier and cheaper to get increase accountiblity and responsiblity by the drunk that causes the accidents? I think not!
Where are the politicians and public pushing for more accountability - like loosing a drivers license for 5 to 10 years for a start
Does making liquor easier and cheaper to get increase accountiblity and responsiblity by the drunk that causes the accidents? I think not!
Where are the politicians and public pushing for more accountability - like loosing a drivers license for 5 to 10 years for a start
Mesa Az resident | 7:59 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
I have never understood those people who fall in love with an area (Mesa, Az
being one of those areas)who then fail to see and understand what made the area
what it is. For starters, the people who first moved to the area made decisions
based on goals or a plan they had in mind. Then, the area became what it is.
Now, newcomers who love the area and move to the area to enjoy it, begin to
change what they loved in the first place. Mesa is no longer what it once was
and Utah is facing the same dilemma.
Scott | 8:00 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Does the church have influence? Yes. But its only because the majority of
legislatures choose for themselves to be influenced by the church in making the
decisions. To blame the church for creating laws is wrong. Spirituality and
religion of individuals, in whatever denomination or nature it may be, is part
of the personality, belief and character of those individuals whether it be for
good or bad. When decisions are made by those individuals, they alone are
responsible. They chose to act on there beliefs. It is true that many
government officials in Utah decide to wait for statements from the church to
make their decisions but once again that is the individual's choice. The
church did not tell them to wait for their input. If one is uncomfortable or
disagrees with the legislature's choices and whether they feel the
individual is being influenced by the church too much then vote that legislature
out of office. That is what democracy is for. Society can vote out who they
wish. Don't blame those who don't make the decisions, put
responsibility on the lawmakers and ourselves for electing the lawmakers.
Benefits?? | 8:07 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
What are the benefits of alcohol?
I tried it a few times as a kid but never found a use for it. Maybe a drinker could shed some light on the subject? (I might have to check back in a few hours. After consuming thier "relaxing" beverage last night they might not be up this early.)
I tried it a few times as a kid but never found a use for it. Maybe a drinker could shed some light on the subject? (I might have to check back in a few hours. After consuming thier "relaxing" beverage last night they might not be up this early.)
Utah | 8:06 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
A Dictator State ruled by the State and the LDS Religion
There seems to be no Seperation
To many old Fosils are running The Judicial System
Just a matter of time to fence the state
Criminals are every where
There seems to be no Seperation
To many old Fosils are running The Judicial System
Just a matter of time to fence the state
Criminals are every where
ScottAZ | 8:09 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Kudos to the church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
Ernest T. Bass | 8:11 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Hooray for theocracy!!
Otherside | 8:15 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
to: Beliefs don't @ 7:41 a.m.
Being non-LDS, may I just say "thank you" for having respect for your friends differing view. I hope, and would like to think, there are a lot more LDS like you around who put friendship and mutual respect ahead of legalisms. Cheers !
Being non-LDS, may I just say "thank you" for having respect for your friends differing view. I hope, and would like to think, there are a lot more LDS like you around who put friendship and mutual respect ahead of legalisms. Cheers !
Brother Chuck Schroeder | 8:22 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
With using the "words" only "freedom of choice" comes some
heavy consequences for bad behaviors, none of us really have that. We HAVE
freedom to choose right from wrong - good from evil" WITHOUT living in thar
gray area between the two, and, calling it just another livestyle choice
that's ok to "just do it" and worry about it when we get caught.
The LDS Church and its Membership, should NOT let State Law Maker's write
any law's to permote anything about alcohol to try and make it good, or for
more use of it. If it does this, than it should lose its Tax Exempt stat's
for good. After all, it's Jesus Christ's Church, HE knows what's
right, not some member running the call's only. That's my view. I to
should have a voice here, after being a Member for 50 years now, don't ya
think?.
This Californian | 8:29 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
does not see the need to have any alcohol available any time any where. Utah
should continue to be a state where one can visit and not suffer the alcoholics
that occupy the streets and public establishments we suffer elsewhere. Change if
you wish, but at the peril of becoming less attractive to those of us who seek a
safer, healthier environment. No one needs alcohol. No one needs the effects of
the alcoholic. No one!
Poco Vino | 8:30 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
I drink a glass of red wine with dinner every evening. It is healthful and
responsible. So did my Mormon ancestors before "the brethren" decided
to contradict the word of the Lord and make the "Word of Wisdom" a
commandment.
Two Questions | 8:32 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
What year did the LDS church quit using wine for sacrament? Was it because
water is cheaper?
Bigots? | 8:33 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
Bigot �noun: a person who is utterly intolerant of any
differing creed, belief, or opinion.
I sense a lot of malevolence coming from the predominant faith in this article. How many of you have either flat out called someone a bigot or implied they are a bigot if they disagree with your religious views? I can only assume that you use that word with much hate and spite in your heart. There are those of us who live in Utah for the atmosphere (small town), great snow and wonderful diversity of camping and outdoor activities. When you tell me, �if you don�t like the Church influence in Utah you should leave�, you come off as very elitist and quite frankly, ignorant. While I won�t ignore the fact that there are plenty of people outside of your religion that can be labeled as �bigots�, from where I sit there are just as many INSIDE your religion that deserve that label as well.
I sense a lot of malevolence coming from the predominant faith in this article. How many of you have either flat out called someone a bigot or implied they are a bigot if they disagree with your religious views? I can only assume that you use that word with much hate and spite in your heart. There are those of us who live in Utah for the atmosphere (small town), great snow and wonderful diversity of camping and outdoor activities. When you tell me, �if you don�t like the Church influence in Utah you should leave�, you come off as very elitist and quite frankly, ignorant. While I won�t ignore the fact that there are plenty of people outside of your religion that can be labeled as �bigots�, from where I sit there are just as many INSIDE your religion that deserve that label as well.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
Words Remaining
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Grizzlies lend forward to AHL team 2:06 a.m.
- Basic Sports Training clinic Saturday 2:06 a.m.
- Tony Finau reaches Big Break finale 2:05 a.m.
- Chicken-lovers dance for free food 2:02 a.m.
- Kansas' Secret Santa gives away $ 1:24 a.m.
- 75 hostages seized in Phillippines 1:24 a.m.
- Gates: US to be Afghan partner 1:23 a.m.
- Al-Qaida claims credit for blasts 1:23 a.m.
- Utah Utes campus briefs 12:39 a.m.
- SUU campus briefs 12:37 a.m.
- Hot Rod behind mic for Lakers
- Max Hall wants to look ahead
- Cougars use depth to beat ASU
- Panel passes BCS playoff bill
- Non-BCS schools not given fair shot
- Crash landing next to I-15
- Psychologist: Mitchell schizophrenic
- Palin signs books, chats with fans
- Snow brings big chill
- Jazz go up against 'the best'
- Letters: Global warming a lie
229 - TCU to play Boise in Fiesta Bowl206
- BYU football: Bronco weighs in on Hall184
- Cougars going back to Vegas150
- Utah/BYU rivalry can be more civil147
- Andersen apologizes for Jordan hoax138
- Max Hall wants to look ahead119
- Revive full food tax?100
- Yet again, we learn BCS is a big joke94
- Palin signs books, chats with fans94
Love him or hate him, Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch knows how to get attention.
My wife Lisa and I would prefer never to argue. But that's not going to...
For the latest news in the health care debate and how it affects you...
Latest comments
Top 5 Players in minutes played: Utah 1 Fr, 2 Jr, 2 Sr Jr Carlon Brown...
Yep "self righteous" if the rest of us who don't rubber neck left, you would...
Thank you for keeping the team here for all of these years, and for always...
of misery, inconsistency, road games losses and of course, NO TITLE ! Long...
Glad to hear about Matt and the others who demonstrate you can play at a high...
I guess they forgot that God made clothes for Adam and Eve and that was...
and good luck.
There is an inherent problem in any rating system -- it takes into account...
Give Phillips some credit. He was 5/5 in field goals in the YBU game, and the...
Mr. Bender's kind of thinking doesn't even acknowledge that the world is...
Advertisements