Comments about ‘FLDS man strikes plea deal in YFZ raid’

Return to article »

Published: Friday, Aug. 15 2008 12:18 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
grecthen

dags! should we expect to find this lad wandering aimlessly in the desert for fraternizing with a female, certainly not one of Daddy's very own "trainess," think you?....and will the big W unleash a fire-and-brimstone THOU SHALT NEVER tyrade, e'en whilst planning on scooping up additional nubile "trainess" for his own collection? Tune in next time.....

Sill investigating Rozita?

"The call itself that sparked the raid is still being investigated as a hoax."

----------------

That same tiresome line. And completely untrue. Texas isn't investigating, they're covering up. Who was Rozita working with? When did Texas know? Those are the stories, not some boy who wouldn't cooperate with an illegal search.

zxcvbnm


How about that.....a 19 year old man ......perhaps the cops found one of the "lost boys".
Was the girl that he was protecting one of the "pregnant teens".
But wait.......the young men are thrown off the ranch to make way for the sexual needs of the old men.....perhaps the 19 year old is actually 52, better check the guys identification.
How about the girl that the young man was protecting....could it have been the pregnant Sarah.
I sure hope that the rangers finish their "Sarah" investigation before "Sarah" is unable to have more children, but hey......I hear "Sarah" is now with Elvis and he is beyond fathering a child.

deliverance

gotta love the photo. shouldn't he be sitting in a tree playing the banjo, waiting for Burt Reynolds to squeal like a pig?

Interloper

But, we are supposed to believe no FLDS were hiding girls that night. Levi was just taking her for a ride to see some new fencing, I guess.

The lad sure does resemble his daddy - unfortunately.

A. Nony Mouse

Perhaps he realized that if the authorities continued to investigate him they'd find a Pandora's box of underage women who are raising his children or something? What would that say then?

Hugh McBryde

Why is the lie "Saw other signs of abuse" still being repeated as if it had credibility? Nothing that the Grand Jury has charged so far has ANYTHING to do with the supposed "signs of abuse" that Texas supposedly "saw" yet YOU, in the PRESS continue to repeat it UNEXAMINED.

Can you NAME what Texas saw? No one has been able to do that since it was demonstrated that there were no "pregnant underage girls" seen at the ranch.

Laughing Panfish

Who was the girl with Levi?

Those of us with minds want to know more.

And yeah, fella, I can tell you some of what was seen. Can but shall not, at this time.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments