Reader comments
Medical waste incinerator still sparks concern

2 comments   |   Read story

Bob G | 6:04 a.m. Aug. 9, 2008
We're talking bio-hazards being burned at this plant, not some run of the mill industrial shop emitting saw dust. If you can smell it or see particulate then the burn is incomplete and who knows what deadly toxic bio-hazards are being dumped on the valley? Bio-hazard waste should be destroyed farther away from populated and residential neighborhoods where people live and spend most of their time. Bio-hazards can have an accumulative affect on health and the DAQ is basically admitting they are not monitoring this facility or the residents near by. Home building and occupation should be restricted until the DAQ can establish the accumulative levels of toxins with their own testing and not that of the company. It is redicousl that this agency allow company testing of corruptable data to rely on. The DAQ should do all its own testing, its what they are paid to do, and provide all data to the public. The DAQ really doesn't know why air quality is so bad and where its coming from in Utah. Without any facts on industrial and commercial pollution, the DAQ has made it very easy for commercial business to falsify emission data.
tom | 12:57 p.m. Sept. 4, 2008
ok from a few years working in the med waste feild. The only time you would see any particulate is when the dump stack is forced to open during a power failure, or catastrophic systems failure. The smell coming from the waste inside the plant is what you may have been smelling, as exaust gasses are less pungent than flatulance. It's not that the waste treatment plant should be built further away from homes it's that home should not be built in industrial area's. Industrial area's exist so companys can avoid the "not in my back yard" senario, it's the home builders fault for putting the houses in an industrial area. Finally all air polution equipment records for up to 5 years are open to inspection by goverment agencies at any time with out notice. the stack testing mentioned in the article is preformed under federal guide line on a 3 year minimum basis.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Advertisement
previousnext

Latest comments

56% 3rd down conversions = Few punts. BYU leads the nation in 3rd down...

No one should be forced to pay for someone else's abortion. It's not a...

Who's the best coach in the nation? Kyle.

The State only requires the city to provide 20 psi min, not 50.

Editorial: Mormons and gay rights

To the 6:06 commentator, In 1987 the Supreme Court ruled that religious...

There are no such things as Union Reps for teachers. Utah is a right to work...

Before we let Las Vegas have the water from Snake Valley ecosystem, everybody...

are you talking about the 528 "legal" perscription drugs deaths in Utah last...

How about solving TWO PROBLEMS at once. Put an additional "income" tax on...

Max Hall a disappointment? What's your QB rating? What's that you say, never...

Advertisements
Advertisement