Reader comments
Renew the township law

3 comments   |   Read story

Joe | 10:01 a.m. Aug. 9, 2008
A fundamental error in this editorial is the statement "lawmakers stepped in and passed a law allowing unincorporated areas to form townships."

It is, in fact, the county commissioners who form the townships; in the case of Cottonwood Heights township, over the objections of the residents (I know; I attended the meetings). The law allows the county commissioners to form townships wherever they desire without the input of the residents of those townships.

Some of the reasons that new cities have been incorporated is specifically because the county is slow to listen to their needs. Additionally, we in Cottonwood Heights, got tired of subsidizing other unincorporated parts of the county including Millcreek and Olympus Hills.

If current residents are happy to be in townships, then that is great. We just need to be aware that there are other aspects to the issues of incorporating and living in townships.
evensteven | 10:19 a.m. Aug. 9, 2008
The Trib's assertion that cities want to annex townships is tenuous, except perhaps in the case of Millcreek. Does anyone honestly believe Sandy wants the donut hole White City? Decrepid infrastructure, no tax base, high cost of service. Granite is pretty much the same. Let the county deal with their problems. Don't pawn them off on the cities.

Mayor Corroon has already floated the idea of special service districts (read higher taxes) for each township to address their infrastructure needs. He can take the political heat for raising taxes far higher than those paid by Sandy City residents. Townships are free to remain unique communities. At some point, however, the piper must be paid to keep the street lights on, the roads paved and the Sheriff at the ready.
Large Pockets | 12:26 a.m. Aug. 10, 2008
There are pockets of neighborhoods in townships that also don't want to belong to the Townships they were assigned to. My neighborhood, for example, was marketed as being in West Jordan, when the homes were being built five years ago. Too many trusting home buyers bought there, only to find out they had moved into Kearns. Shame on the home builders, and also shame on the buyers for not doing more research--I guess.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Image
Deseret News Archives

Hundreds of people gather as the future of the Millcreek Township is debated at a town hall meeting at Skyline High School last March.

previousnext

Latest comments

Grover was the last competent Commissioner we had, good luck to him.

BYU's old uniforms?

Some USU guy is going to complain about how BYU "stole" their particular...

Twilight

I completely agree... i had higher expectations than what was shown.

BYU's old uniforms?

It is Aggie Blue and you all know it!!! It's to honor the great Aggie Alum...

Fall sports academic all-state

As a former coach I was blessed enough to coach several academic all-state...

Twitterati to BCS: 'We hate you.'

Mega March Madness is fun and so will Mega January Playoff would be good! I...

Energy cuts likely to go unnoticed

aaaaaaaah yes, "HIGHER EDUCATION" vs "LiL Ole Me", not much smarter then a...

BYU's old uniforms?

Just do it. USU blue is not BYU blue.

Another private city army to satisfy a Mayor and Councils ego, that is not...

Thunder rolls by Jazz

re:Unbelievable Sorry mate but with a losing record in the playoffs, this...

Advertisements