Reader comments
Utah college chiefs want liquor-free sports TV
63 comments | Read story
My only question as a huge college football fan and non-drinker: do I have the right to dictate to those who drink; my morals?
Its like the pope and birth control. If you don't play the game, you can't make the rules.
Why???
People legally carry guns are very, very seldom a problem.
Do you really think a person planning on shooting up a campus cares whether the campus bans guns?
------------------------------
There are plenty of other advertisers out there who can fill the gap left by beer ads. It's time colleges started being responsible for the message they are sending to their students and their fans. As the famous quote in Animal House states, "Fat drunk and stupid" is no way to go through life.
It serves no good purpose and only causes grief and pain.
I just don't get it.
I still crack up when I see 50 year old men thinking they are "cool" because they are drinking. You know the guys that brag about drinking or walk around holding up their drink for everyone to see. What are they hiding from?
Get a life.
This is not a question of religious morals. It is a question of business ethics. It is wise to advertise products at a venue that show cases members of society that can use and "sport" those products. Beer ads are a great source of money for Major League Games, where many of the players can legally enjoy the product. College games should be endorsing youth oriented product, the obvious athletic products, energy drinks, sports drink, and on and on, but not alcoholic product.
College foot ball is exactly that...COLLEGE Football. Despite it's popularity it is still associated with an educational institution and it should uphold it's values even in the advertising realm. Now this doesn't mean i don't think that they should/or shouldn't serve at the stadium, have I.D. will serve. Just because you limit advertisements doesn't mean you have to limit product.
Have you ever accompanied an EMT responding to an accident caused by a drunk driver and actually seen up close and personal the innocent people who were killed or maimed for life?
Have you ever seen a wife or child who was beaten up but a drunk husband or father?
To simply ignore the horrific toll that alcohol abuse inflicts on society, because its adverstisers are "the hand that feeds you," is naive and stupid.
Wake up!
Some day it may touch your life and it may be your kids being pulled out of the wreckage with the jaws of life. Those entering beer ads may not seem so innocent when you see the open can of Bud lying on the floor of vehicle that just took away the most precious things in your life.
But, thinking people everywhere -- conservatives, liberals, religious, secular -- should be concerned with a serious problem that destroys more American lives than guns and wars EVERY YEAR!
Utah one of the only places in the United States that allows you to smoke in a bar.
NFL stadiums are cleaning up their image to by banning: Behavior that is unruly, disruptive, or illegal. Drunkenness and signs of alcohol impairment that result in irresponsible behavior. Foul or abusive language or obscene gestures. Interference with the progress of the game, including throwing objects onto the field.Failing to follow instructions of stadium personnel. Verbal or physical harassment of fans from the opposing team.
It's time to clean up the image of football, and I applaud their decision.
It is telling that some on this message board want to ban alcohol all together. Or they want to blame drink driving on advertising. Guess what, car accidents are bad weather or not they are caused by drunk drivers. Cell phone users are likely to cause accidents, shall we ban cell phone companies from advertising during NCAA games? We cant even get our legislators to ban texting while driving.
It's time for the anti-conservative/anti-religious crowd in Utah to broaden their view a little and realize that public smoking and alcohol abuse are public health and public safety issues.
Promoting beer sales to college students and teens, a huge chunk of the college football audience, is irresponsible. It's nice to see colleges starting to recognize their ethical responsibility.
Relax...we'll still have the Pontiac game changing performance.
One of the stupidest arguments people make, that adverstising doesn't affect sales.
Do you really think that the Bud beancounters would spend millions of dollars every year advertising their products if advertising didn't affect sales?
Of course the Bud ads affect sales, and anyone with half-a-brain who watches the ads can see that many of the ads are focused directly on college-age consumers.
You're free to drink if you want. Nobody is stopping you.
But to argue that adverstising WON'T entice some college age and younger football fans to start drinking is disingenuous and stupid.
btw, your cell phone complaint is valid, but nothing but a red herring in the context of this discussion.
Advertising may get you to choose to drink another brand, but it doesnt "entice some college age and younger football fans to start drinking". I will concede that I may be giving people more intellectual credit than they deserve but in my experience the best advertising cannot get me to buy something I dont already want. Perhaps my susceptibility (sp) to advertising is much lower than most.
My cell phone comment is a red herring, but it was in response to another red herring already posted (you can tell which one).
It's their speech, if you want to wrap yourself in the First Ammendment, do so in a way that shows understanding about what the First ammendment is.
This is the same argument that the tobacco companies used to defend their ads aimed directly at kids. Does any thinking person really believe that Joe Camel was created to get 50-year-olds to switch from Marlboro?
Where do you think new drinkers come from? How many beer drinkers started drinking in high school and even junior high school? How many of them started drinking because of entertaining beer ads that showed it was cool to drink beer? If you think that the ads are only meant to get established beer drinkers to switch brands, you are extremely naive.
It is not the government saying what advertisements can and cannot be run, it's the universities, their presidents, coaches, and athletic directors despite the accusations of someone who hates conservatives. Though I must admit that I have no problem with the FCC banning cigarette commercials for the past 30 - 40 years. I still remember cigarette jingles from the TV ads in the 60s.
as has been said already, commercial speech on public airways is a bit different than individuals' speech.
I totally agree with the comment about Myles Brand; that guy would advertise sausages made from old ladies if he thought he could make a buck, just so long as the old ladies weren't American Indians. Please forgive the absuridity of the analogy, no offense is intended towards any group of people, but to point out Mr. Brand's hypocrisy.
Nope, good call on that one.
Also, this is not a "ban" on advertising, this is the NCAA choosing not to advertise something, just like when NASCAR stopped advertising smokeless tobacco on their cars.
Like NASCAR, the NFL has a right to choose who advertises.
The Burger King / McDonalds analogy is a bit of a stretch. How many college age kids die from "Big Mac" or "Whopper" poisoning?
Typical knee jerk reaction from yooterville.
Not NFL, NNCAA has the right to advertise who they want.
The NFL is the organization cleaning up stadium behaveior.
ITS ABOUT TIME!!!
Have you ever been to a Utah game at RES?
Utah either has a much smaller studentbody than most people assume, or a lot of students are coming disguised as red stadium chairs.
Rest assured ... drink up!
You know - backyard barbeques with XYZ BBQ sauce, and little Johnny runs out in the street in the background without checking both ways.
Otherwise, I am not adverse to any organization attempting to protect their brand by associating it with university with sponsorship they consider inappropriate. However taking the argument to a logical or illogical extreme is a problem in itself. Outlawing any one item, simply because if abused it causes tragedy does not make for good policy or law and has never been proven to be practical. Individual rights and freedom of choice unfortunately leads to tragic consequences far and beyond the individual who made the bad choice. No law or ban will prevent that.
Otherwise, what is your "strong opposition" to banning beer ads in college football broadcasts?
The college presidents are on the right track. Ban the beer ads. We don't need them.
Is it something anyone needs.
Can't you watch a game without the ads?
Is this really an issue???
"Ute fans purposely drink at the BYU games because they know BYU fans despise alcohol."
If that is the reason, it is probably the dumbest reason in the world, to make someone angry. Sounds like the first step to alcoholism to me.
It does explain alot, though.
I've always seen two cultures in Utah. The Molly type Mormons, and those that drink, smoke, tatt up, wear wife beaters on the street and anything else to anger the LDS.
I move here from CA, and we are creating a sub-culture of people who know how to have a "couple" and leave it at that. Then it's live and let live, and not really give a rip about what others do.
The smoke does "bug" in bars and at parties, so I respect those that smoke out side, and I appreciate when people maintain control and not spill their drinks on me...
What part of "So far, 60 Division I college presidents, 240 athletic directors and 101 football and basketball coaches have signed letters calling for the NCAA to add beer to a list of products that cannot be advertised during college games. That list includes cigarettes, guns, nightclubs and gambling" don't you understand? How do you read Mormon in this? Even NASCAR has banned tobacco ads. You surely don't understand separation of church and state. Sorry, didn't mean to call you Shirley.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- SL Co. to consider gay protections 7:38 p.m.
- High school football: All-region teams 6:35 p.m.
- Aunt shouldn't enable drug habit 6:30 p.m.
- Dr. explains Mitchell review change 6:12 p.m.
- Stephanopoulos moves to GMA 6:09 p.m.
- DVDs include 'Stanwyck' and 'Ted' 6:07 p.m.
- Cool or hot, souls share same core 6:04 p.m.
- Christians voice belief in astrology 6:04 p.m.
- Utah churches in the news 6:00 p.m.
- Religion news around the world 5:58 p.m.
- Letters: Global warming a lie
276 - TCU to play Boise in Fiesta Bowl
207 - BYU football: Bronco weighs in on Hall
195 - Palin signs books, chats with fans
169 - Utah/BYU rivalry can be more civil
151 - Cougars going back to Vegas
150 - Andersen apologizes for Jordan hoax
143 - Nude bathers cited for lewdness
137 - Max Hall wants to look ahead
130 - Jazz fall apart late at L.A.
110
David Rankin, one of Utah's youngest and ablest astrophotographers has...
There was a time when free shipping was rare. This holiday season, you...
Can you tell I just got out of a budget meeting with Gov Gary Herbert?
Hopefully he'll go to the Steelers. After 8 sacks against the Browns, he'd...
maybe john stockton and karl malone were lucky that they didn't get many...
Bravo Developers & Builders, without them no one would have a house to live...
Miles, saying that Dwill is not an all-star is insane. That he needs to work...
I have been camping in that area also,(several years ago) and it was rough...
Actually Utah would NOT have been national champions in 2004 or 2008 in the...
I am surprised the tickets didn't give a preasigned seat. It had been that...
Thanks to Craig for some great football memories. He was the best offensive...
What about Martinez? He's won a few!
This diversity of belief in individuals is interesting. It just goes to show...


