Deseret News | Will Romney be named McCain's VP this week?

Reader comments
Will Romney be named McCain's VP this week?

210 comments | Read story

Page:
1
2
3
4
5
Next >

VP | 10:28 a.m. July 22, 2008

Hopefully the VP candidate will be Bobby Jindal...36yo Reagan!

Chuckles55 | 10:29 a.m. July 22, 2008

Wow! What a cliff-hanger. This was set up when Romney withdrew early from the primaries. In November, the talking heads can disect Mormonism and its role in why McCain wasn't elected.

Who Cares | 10:36 a.m. July 22, 2008

Who cares? They are both corrupt.

Comments continue below

Mills Levan | 10:39 a.m. July 22, 2008

"Will Romney be named McCain's VP this week?"

No. At least I hope not. Doing so would seriously hurt whatever chance McCain may have to win the election.

Get Over it! | 10:42 a.m. July 22, 2008

There is no way this is going to happen, and the only place we are seeing that Romney will be VP is in our local papers.

T_H_R_O | 10:43 a.m. July 22, 2008

I anticipate alot of religious bigotry to seep out from people if McCain does indeed choose Romney, who already has enough flaws as-is. Romney will only help McCain win Michigan, if that. Otherwise, people will see his flip-flops on myriad issues as a weakness that McCain hasn't complimented with his own consistency - because he's shown little. Florida Governor Charlie Crist would be a better choice if McCain wants to win.

James | 10:42 a.m. July 22, 2008

Mr. McCain must want my vote afterall! The only way he would get it would be to include Mitt on the ticket. I believe that the ticket should include at least one person qualified to be president. Anyone else besides Mr. Romney would mean that my father will receive another vote for president this year as a write-in candidate. I will always try to vote for someone at least qualified to be president. All my regards to Ms Clinton and Mr. Obama but no vote!

Timmy | 10:43 a.m. July 22, 2008

Any bets on this? I'll wager 10 virtual dollars it's not Romney. I think Romney would be perfect for McCain, but don't think McCain has the forsight or charactor to see it. So I'll wager another 10 virtual dollars he picks Rick Santorum.

Justice for GOP victims | 10:49 a.m. July 22, 2008

Why not Romney?

Use McCain's failing campaign to transfer millions in campaign funds as a reward to the last remaining loyal LDS Republicans, who work in a significant portion of the call centers and direct mail operations on behalf of the GOP.

The rest of the country will support Obama, and upon his inauguration the U.S. Department of Justice will begin extraditing Republicans from their spider holes in the Beehive State to a venue where they can be held accountable for enabling the misdeeds of the Bush administration for the past eight years.

Obama supporter | 10:53 a.m. July 22, 2008

Yippeeeeeee!

Marc | 10:55 a.m. July 22, 2008

This is pure political theatre. He's trying to divert attention from Obama's international tour.

Instead of giving us cheap theatrics (Will he pick Mitt? I really hope so!), why doesn't he hold a press conference on how he plans to fix the economy, health care, and the problems in the Middle East? Surely this is more pressing than the American Idol contest for VP.

It really doesn't matter | 10:57 a.m. July 22, 2008

I pray not. Does it really matter? A republican isn't getting elected. You can think those who voted for Bush for killing Mitt's changes. Dream on.

I wont vote for a Mormon. We have witnessed, in California, that members of the LDS Church get the instructions how to vote from the church.

I lived in Utah. I hate nanny government.

Yoda | 11:00 a.m. July 22, 2008

Wise the man McCain is if Romney as his VP he picks. Romney the best possible candidate for VP is. Dialogue beyond religion to more serious issues as November approaches has moved. Wild-eyed liberals nervous about Romney's conservative credentials will be for months. Middle America elections always win, and McCain/Romney the day will carry. Timing this week for announcement perfect is. Unconvincing as world leader Obama seems to be while Iraq he is in.

AWSOME | 11:04 a.m. July 22, 2008

I think Romney is just what he needs, but it does make me nervous that they are going to play all the bad things that Romney said about him during the primary.

President Obama | 11:08 a.m. July 22, 2008

CNN has almost the same story except they are predicting it will be Jindal. So sorry to those of you who blindly pledged allegiance to Mr. Romney. Maybe next time.

Re: Who Cares | 11:06 a.m. July 22, 2008

I agree. We can't even hope for a worthy presidential candidate from the republican or democratic ticket this term unless miraculoulsly the people vote for another candidate in majority numbers.

what a joke | 11:10 a.m. July 22, 2008

i keep trying to post comments, and they keep getting blocked

nobody cares, and the local media keeps posting articles about romney.

Kim in Cheyenne | 11:08 a.m. July 22, 2008

Mitt would be the right choice for the GOP ticket, however the Vice Presidency has often been the political cemetary for politicians...such as Dan Quayle, Al Gore, Spiro Agnew, Walter Mondale. We need Mitt in 2012, whether he's on the 2008 ticket or not.

Lydia | 11:16 a.m. July 22, 2008

Oh, please no! If there's one thing that would sling-shot me in Obama's direction, it would be naming Romney his running mate. These two choices for running mates are the most important in history.

I Hope so | 11:17 a.m. July 22, 2008

Then we can all listen to more of his tales about his father marching with Dr. Martin Luther King. I'm sure he has had enough time to think up some new and exciting ones. Just to listen to the Colbert Report make fun of him, is enough for me to want him to be McCain's running mate.

Anonymous | 11:31 a.m. July 22, 2008

John Huntsman would be a good choice too, as they are political allies, and Huntsman is filthy ric...err..just as good at economic policy as Romney.

this nation is not liberal | 11:36 a.m. July 22, 2008

Despite Bush not doing a good job, he got RE-ELECTED. Why? Because this nation, cumulatively speaking, is much more conservative than liberal. Despite what Hollywood and the liberal media wants you to believe, Americans value more hardwork over handouts and capitalism over socialism.

As bad as Bush has screwed things up, it's amazing to think that the democratic nominee is not a shoe-in to be president. But he's not. The current polls show Obama over McCain by just the margin of error. If I were a democrat, I'd be very, very nervous.

America is not ready to elect somebody who wants to raise corporate taxes - even though the US has the highest corporate tax rate of any of the major countries. America is not ready to elect somebody who associates himself with preachers who promote racist beliefs. America isn't quite ready to elect somebody who isn't committed to investing enough to keep the military strong.

Clinton was the only democrat to get elected over the last 28 years, and the only reason he won (with just 33% of the general vote) is because of Perot.

Obama will be a distant memory in a year.

I doubt it | 11:36 a.m. July 22, 2008

When was the last time a winning candidate picked the guy everybody was talking about? They always pick somebody nobody expected.

Mitt's got too many negatives - Mormon, most money spent but didn't go nearly far enough, perceived as plastic, not conservative enough for the right wing of the party, flip flopping, etc. I like him, think he was the best qualified man running this time around. He can even talk - unlike our current POTUS. But I have to be realistic - McCain is already behind and doesn't need an anchor.

RE: Timmy | 11:37 a.m. July 22, 2008

I'll see your 10 virtual dollars and raise you 8! This being said, how do I collect my virtual purse from you? Does Walmart.com accept virtual dollars. I'd rather support a company promoting government subsidized housing than vote for the man who will destroy our economy and introduce socialism (Obama). I'll vote for McCain if he runs with Romney, otherwise, Go Nader!

re: ...doesn't matter | 10:57 | 11:37 a.m. July 22, 2008

"We have witnessed, in California, that members of the LDS Church get the instructions how to vote from the church."

Wow! Good point! I hadn't really thought of it that way. But, makes no difference to me. I wasn't going to vote McCain-Romney (or McCain-anybody) anyway.

Obama '08!!!

What a joke, | 11:42 a.m. July 22, 2008

This will mean more Republican welfare for big corporations. The Republicans give the oil companies 250 billion dollars in tax credits each year. They are the borrow and spend conservatives.

Publius | 11:45 a.m. July 22, 2008

To "Get Over It." As a matter of fact numerous news outlets from Real Clear Politics to The Huffington Post to the cable channels to daily newspapers are taking seriously the possibility of a McCain-Romney ticket. There is a thoughtful piece in today's Boston Globe by its Washington correspondent, Peter Canellos. "As it happens, Romney's chances are looking better and better. The intensifying focus on the economy has left McCain . . . in need of a running mate who can make a good case for GOP economic policies. . . . There is little doubt that Romney would be an asset to McCain."

No no son | 11:46 a.m. July 22, 2008

No way. McCain's mother would never let him choose "a slimy. lying Mormon." And John listens to Mommy.

johndallas | 11:43 a.m. July 22, 2008

It looks like we may have to endure another one term wonder like we did in the 70's with Jimmy Carter. Although I'm a lifetime Republican, I will have to admit that the Republicans seem to have brought this on themselves. Maybe when all is said and done wiser heads will prevail and all of the fluff and empty hype for Mr. Obama will fade away like he will.

stating the obvious | 11:44 a.m. July 22, 2008

re: Justice for GOP victims | 10:49 a.m. July 22, 2008

Why not Romney?

Because, Most if not all conservative Christians in the bible belt which pretty much defines the GOP would not vote for a Mormon. Rumor is; they have a hard enough time w/ McCain.

The only thing Romney ensures is that McCain would get Utah's 5 electoral votes which he'll probably get anyway.

Utah, in November, brought to you by the letter R and number 0.

agreenblinker | 11:56 a.m. July 22, 2008

I can answer the question in this headline with one word:

No

Look, Romney is a non-candidate everywhere but Utah. He is not viable and a VP nomination does nothing to help McCain win outside of Utah.

Pay attention to national politics and then get back to me please.

Paul | 11:58 a.m. July 22, 2008

For those of you who think the only paper covering Romney as VP is the Deseret News, checkout the national papers. They're all covering it!

Oh Please | 12:03 p.m. July 22, 2008

Just what we need. Vice President Billionaire. A guy who's never had to make a living, never had to pay an insurance bill, never had to worry where the grocery money was coming from, never had to work on his own car. A guy whose food appears from nowhere, whose mansion gets cleaned by invisible hands, and whose wallet is managed by 1,000 accountants. Just the kind of guy who can relate to the rest of us. NOT.

Not gonna happen.... | 12:00 p.m. July 22, 2008

Not gonna happen....people "know" too much about Mormons. Not a good choice from that standpoint. Having said that, Romney is a very logical and good choice if people's bigotry is not factored in. But then McGeezer is not going to win anyway. When you are a VEEP on a losing ticket it usually is not good for your future presidential prospects. It is a lose-lose situation.

M. Allred | 12:05 p.m. July 22, 2008

It really doesn't matter | 10:57 a.m. wrote that he/she would not vote "for a Mormon."

This religious profiling (intolerance) is one hand that tears this nation apart. The comment is equal to saying: ï¿½I would not vote for Hillary because she is a woman;ï¿½ ï¿½I will not vote for Barack because he is Black;ï¿½ ï¿½I will not vote for McCain because he is a protestant;ï¿½ ï¿½I will not vote for John Doe because he drives a Dodge;ï¿½ ï¿½I will note vote for Jane Doe because she is blonde and listens to Brooks and Dunn.ï¿½

It is a candidateï¿½s political platform, not their religion, race or gender an informed voter votes on. This nation cries out for tolerance. Business canï¿½t discriminate; age, sex, gender, race and religion ARE NOT reasons to disqualify a qualified person, whomever they may be.

So what if Mitt is LDS, big deal. Look at the candiate's (and his running mate's) platform.

Iron Cold Steve | 12:13 p.m. July 22, 2008

Now is the time to accept the fact - President Obama in Jan 2009. Because Oprah said so!!! McCain can chose anyone he wants to, even Hillary, the GOP for the last eight have been the problem and offer no solutions, except the oil companies get richer. After four years of Jimmy "Obama" Carter, maybe the GOP will have its act together for 2012. AND THATS THE BOTTOM LINE!!!

Romney a heathen | 12:17 p.m. July 22, 2008

Just ask the GOP religious "far" right - Romney is a GODLESS Heathen. No way these kooks are going to let a Mormon anywhere near the white house. Anyway, I hope Romney is NOT selected because then I would have to vote for McCain for president.

King Obama | 12:16 p.m. July 22, 2008

Does it really matter? The masses will vote the left version of Bush 2000 (i.e. inexperienced, media coddled, not adequately vetted, blindly supported by core constituency). Unfortunately, this race is heavy on promises and short on long-term solutions. Maybe that is why there is such a vicious anti-Romney following?

Nate S. | 12:20 p.m. July 22, 2008

Mitt brings to the table substantial economic experience ... the one area where McCain really struggles.

Better Option | 12:22 p.m. July 22, 2008

It would be much better for the Party (and Romney himself) if McCain chose someone else. I'd personally like to see how Sarah Palin handles the national stage--she and Bobby Jindal may well be the future.

Romney is a liability for the ticket on an electoral basis (I am Mormon, and before you all jump on me for saying he's not good for the ticket, remember that is isn't just the Anti crowd--Romney was not consistent on the issues before or while a candidate). However, he would help fundraising. He would be much better suited to head the RNC, where his fundraising prowess and organizational skills would go a long way. Then, he makes his own political future when he does well electing Rs in the midterms (Republicans will recapture the House and/or Senate in '10 if Obama is the President). At that point, he could run for president again in '12 and be stronger than ever.

Rumor has it if Romney is the VP candidate, Huckster will be in line for the RNC job. That would be bad news down-ticket.

to agreeblinker: | 12:23 p.m. July 22, 2008

I suppose you're more connected to national politics, huh? How about you take a look at the Times, WSJ, or CNN, or msnbc. They're all saying Romney is the most likely VP choice.

So, save your condescending view and your own bias. Mitt may get it or may not. But it's not just a Utah perspective that he is a leading candidate.

Wishful thinking | 12:27 p.m. July 22, 2008

I would put more stock in what Romney's press agent said than all this speculation.

BigPoet | 12:32 p.m. July 22, 2008

To "Not gonna happen....": bigotry begins with you.

Romney Would Be Great | 12:32 p.m. July 22, 2008

Adding Romney to the ticket will show McCains intelligence. Bright, articulate, a proven leader and a hard worker. I've been sold on Romney since Iowa. McCain won't get my vote otherwise.

Freddie | 12:38 p.m. July 22, 2008

M. Allred | 12:05 p.m.: "I would not vote for Hillary because she is a woman;" "I will not vote for Barack because he is Black..."

I think you're on to something.

to better option: | 12:40 p.m. July 22, 2008

I agree with your take. I am a huge Romney fan, as presidential candidate. I think he's politically savvy enough to be elected. I also tend to side to most of his policies.

With that said, it may not be in the best interest of the country to name him VP on McCain's ticket. For one, because he doesn't bring the 'southern vote' like Jindal would, and secondly, because it may not be best for the party, where he could be a very strong head of RNC.

Huckabee's not taken seriously, so I'm not worried about him on any national stage. He's already forgotten about in the GOP circle. But the republicans still have a very legitimate shot to win this presidential race, and conservatives should be looking at how to ensure that a left-wing liberal like Obama doesn't get into office.

Funny Truth | 12:38 p.m. July 22, 2008

When dose a nation chose a President that is Whining that they are not getting the same TV air time, Obama is showing maturity by not playing into the republicans kinder garden games
McCain is a War Hero, yet that dose not make one a President of the Free World.

What America wants and needs | 12:38 p.m. July 22, 2008

America needs and wants a totally Christian team
Sorry, but Mitt Romney is not a Christian.

wrz | 12:41 p.m. July 22, 2008

Iron Cold Steve | 12:13 p.m.: "Now is the time to accept the fact - President Obama in Jan 2009."

Then, I suggest you hold onto your wallet. Watch taxes and national debt soar.

The Myths of VP | 12:46 p.m. July 22, 2008

So many of the posters here still seem to believe the old myth that a VP needs to be a strategic pick who can balance the ticket and lead to victory.

That was a view that has been thrown out the window long ago. Regan didn't win because George Bush was the key to getting the Texas vote nor because of his religion. Likewise, Clinton didn't win because Gore could carry the south (Clinton was already from the south, and he was criticized for not picking a more well-known 'elite' democrat from the northeast to help 'carry the ticket').

Selecting the VP now is to give the ticket broader experience. Their impact is based on their own personal qualifications, not their demographic.

I think it's hilarious to see all of those tunnel-vision commentors post things like "Mitt can only impact Utah". WAKE UP! Utah is going to McCain with or without Mitt, and if McCain picks Mitt, it's not going to be because of where he lives, what his faith is, or how he looks. It will be because of his economic experience and appeal to conservative america.

Page:
1
2
3
4
5
Next >

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.