Deseret News | Reader comments: Trial to start in alleged prostitution case

Reader comments
Trial to start in alleged prostitution case

Anything new? | 3:05 p.m. July 10, 2008

Mostly a re-hash of old stories! Tell us how much has been spent pursuing this guy. Not that I support prostituion at all, but tell us instead about how our tax dollars are going after violent, dangerous criminals. Tell us instead about how sentencing laws are becoming more sensible and fair and consistent. Lastly, tell us that Lohra Miller is resigning, moving to a new quiet neighborhood that she can disrupt, and has learned what laws are regarding establishing a business and running it out of one's home. (Like I'll ever see that last story!!)

Do some homework | 6:15 p.m. July 10, 2008

Maese is a violent criminal. He stalked his ex-wife and his ex-partner. He has threatened many of the girls that used to work for him...... He does as he pleases and gets away with it. If the papers would actually do some digging on this man, they would see years and years of a sociopaths behavior. He is a horrible man and his time is up.

This is wrong | 6:18 p.m. July 10, 2008

How can someone who commits crimes, (Unlicensed home law office, lying to police who are investigating the unlicensed home law office) be allowed to prosecute people who commits crimes? That is like the prison run by prisoners. A law enforcer needs to obey the laws. If they don't they should step down from being a law enforcer.

Comments continue below

No really, do some homework. | 9:05 p.m. July 10, 2008

In order for the statement "Maese is a violent criminal." Maese needs to have been convicted (the criminal part) of a violent crime. Neither of those statements are true. Maese has never been convicted of any crime. But I bet you're should be the judge jury and executioner.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.