yorktown | 5:28 a.m. June 11, 2008
Chris Cannon has had 12 years to get the budget balanced.

No success. We're up 3 trillion or so more than where we started when he took office.

Chris Cannon has had 12 years to fix illegal immigration.

No success there, either. We're living in a barrio here in HIS district.

Chris Cannon has had 12 years to fix the earmark "crisis."

Don't send this incumbent back to capitol hill! He's had a turn and he failed. Send somebody new! Anybody! I happen to think Chaffetz is the best candidate to ever run against Cannon and this is our chance to send the message that we've had enough of the good ol' boys club. We're going to change things ourselves.

Elect Jason Chaffetz!
Scotty | 7:59 a.m. June 11, 2008
While Chaffetz certainly is charismatic, something he said at convention really bothered me. He stated that he wants to eliminate citizenship by birth. Without citizenship by birth, I wouldn't be a U.S. citizen.

Isn't that a bit extreme?
Intel | 8:01 a.m. June 11, 2008
Yeah, Yorktown, because one Congressman can balance the budget. You are about as bright as Chaffetz. Jason Chaffetz is going to balance the budget????? Wow, he must be amazing! Singlehandedly? He is like Superman!

Cmon, give me a break. Chaffetz couldn't vote more conservative than Cannon and he will probably go to DC and revert to his Democrat roots. Sorry Jason - the Governor fired you, and we aren't hiring you.
Comments continue below
C_J | 8:28 a.m. June 11, 2008
I find it odd Cannon beleives in civil liberties withillegal immigrants but not our own citizens. He supports real ID, one of the greates threats to civil liberties, Chaffetz does not support real ID.

Cannon supports the status qou on earmarks, they need to be fought. Chaffetz will.

Cannon would not be against the 100 years in Iraq statements made. We need a more humble foreign policy,Chaffetz wouldn't.

They're very different candidates, and I think Chaffetz would be a good change and send a message to Washington.
Anonymous | 9:08 a.m. June 11, 2008
Cannon has had his chance and in my mind has failed. Chaffetz gets my vote.
A delegate | 9:14 a.m. June 11, 2008
I'm no fan of Cannon, but Chaffetz has proven he is not a leader. He really messed up the Governor's office when he was Chief of Staff. Things are much better in all state departments now that experienced people have been hired by Governor Huntsman.
yorktown | 9:21 a.m. June 11, 2008
Intel, is that short for intelligent? Doesn't sound like it to me. You want to send Cannon back for more of the same? I said Chaffetz is the best candidate to run against Cannon, not superman.

I for one am not about to vote for somebody who has had more than a decade in Congress and then tells me all the things that are wrong with Congress. I'm sorry, that's lame. He can't tell me what he's done to try and fix things and then expects me to vote for him again? No way, Jose!

I don't like the way Cannon has whittled away our liberty with laws such as the Patriot Act, Protect America Act, he defends telecommunications companies that spy on American citizens, NAFTA, CAFTA, NCLB, and on and on.

He says he will vote against such nonsense and then does just the opposite. That makes Chris Cannon a liar. You want more of that? I want out.
DCF | 9:34 a.m. June 11, 2008
Hey Yorktown, do you seriously think that Chris Cannon, or for that matter Jason Chaffetz sets the national budget? If so, you have certainly misjudged the reality of Washington DC.

There are 535 members of Congress (House and Senate) and of those about two dozen set the budget. The remaining 510 or so get to fight over it. Jason is not special. He would get to fight over it just like Cannon does, just like the other 509.

arc | 9:53 a.m. June 11, 2008
If Cannon would just vote the way he thinks and listen to others he would be worth sending back. He doesn't.
I also do not feel that anyone here illigally, that came here undocumented to start with, should have any option of becoming a US citizen. Those that are stay-behinds, perhaps, but they should have to get to the back of the line.

Cannon might be tought of illigals, but why do all of them support him over Jason or Spencer?

yorktown | 9:56 a.m. June 11, 2008
DCF, I'm saying that all 535 members ought to be replaced, save the one man who defends liberty. There's only one that I would send back to capitol hill. Cannon is not that man.

Yes, I do understand how things work, do you? Do you really think that sending Cannon back is the solution? Has it been the solution for the past 10 elections? Nope.

And if balancing the budget is out of the reach of a congressman, then why is it the biggest issue in the nation right now among all the members of congress? Get real.

Cannon makes it his issue and then you, his cronie, say he can't do a thing about it. He has, in reality, done everything but try to fix it. I'm not interested in sending him back.

I wish there were a stronger candidate than Chaffetz, but he's the best one to come along thus far and I'm not stupid enough to wait around for perfection. This is our best chance yet.
Did My Homework | 9:59 a.m. June 11, 2008
Cannon doesn't fight spending. He wrote an editorial last year defending the abusive use of earmarks. He thinks that process is transparent. But when representatives drop funding requests into a bill during a closed conference committee, those funding requests never see the light of day.

Cannon not only participates in this process, he defends it. Jason Chaffetz signed the Earmark Pledge and has committed to join forces with people like Jeff Flake to fight against this abusive practice. So yeah - Chaffetz can definitely do more than Cannon has done.
LOL | 11:08 a.m. June 11, 2008
I'm not surprised that people are unhappy with congress but it's funny that some people think all of congress should be replaced.
If I fell and got slivers in my hand I would pull out the slivers before I cut my hand off.
The average time for a Rep in congress is about 15 years because most districts know the importance of seniority in congress. The disillusion of term limits held by some 3rd district voters would be a disservice by robbing our district of a voice that's heard in congress.
Joan | 11:12 a.m. June 11, 2008
After reading responses from both Jason and Cannon I feel that they are similar except that Cannon seems to have a deeper understanding of the issues. He seems to be more realistic when it comes to what one Congressman can do. I hope we re-elect Cannon!
Eldridge | 11:16 a.m. June 11, 2008
As much as I don't like Cannon, I am going to vote for him. Chaffetz is a terrible alternative. He is unreasonable, shows no compassion, and clearly doesn't understand these issues.

However, I also find it a little disturbing that both of these candidates constantly mistake 'affect' and 'effect', 'than' and 'then.' :P Proofreaders guys?
Re: Did My Homework | 11:24 a.m. June 11, 2008
You clearly did not. Did you just read Cannon's reponse? He's saying the earmark process should be transparent not that it is. He's fighting to reform the system in a meaningful way.

My concern with Jason is that he just throws out one liners 'get rid of earmarks' 'eliminate anchor babies' he doesn't provide the details - like a constitutional ammendement in the case of anchor babies. Jason himself cannot change that. I feel like he is the kid running for class president saying he will eliminate homework and make recess two hours long. Sounds good right?
Holly | 11:30 a.m. June 11, 2008
To Scotty - not even Cannon supports "birthright" citizenship. Many countries don't have it - they will grant it to children whose parents are citizens, whether born on their soil or abroad, but it's not an automatic gimme. And where did I get my information? From the Vote Smart website, under the "Political Courage" tab (where Cannon refused to take a stand this election cycle - I wonder why).

That's also the place where Mr Cannon says he is FOR removing legislative limits on campaign donations, where he is FOR earmarks, his is FOR NAFTA and the WTO, and says he a nation's human rights record should NOT affect its "most favored nation" trading status with the United States.

Cannon is not my man. He does not represent me or my views. Jason Chaffetz does. Go Jason!
yorktown | 12:58 p.m. June 11, 2008
LOL, I don't support term limits. I support removing officials from office when they don't do their job. I will say one more time that all 535 members must be replaced, save one man.

Congressmen and Senators are not doing their job to uphold and defend the constitution. They are power hungry, imperialistic, opportunistic, nation builders who seem to think that they can run roughshod over any nation, including their own.

If a man has served 6 terms and has removed as many liberties as Chris Cannon and his associates, then they all need some time to retire and think about what they've done to my country.
BBKing | 1:25 p.m. June 11, 2008
Yorktown, just a clarification to your post, Cannon did not vote yes on NAFTA like all of your friends are saying.

NAFTA was passed in 1993, Cannon wasn't a Congressman until 1997, beat Bill Orton in 1996.

You didn't say he 'voted' for it but many other Chaffetz supporters are. And then you make claim that he supports all of the other items as well.

It might be more productive to stick with what Jason supports, like his amnesty Guest Worker plan.

Explain how that is consistent with his 'no amnesty' convention campaign to the delegates.
Par Corection | 1:30 p.m. June 11, 2008
To Did My Homework: What is the definition of homework? You apparently misconstrued what Cannon stated by smothering his comments with your own preconceived notions. In other words, you heard what you wanted to hear, not what Cannon said. Which goes for the lot of Chaffetz fans, I see. From the evidence it appears that vocal Chaffetz people say what ever they want with willfull disreguard toward the facts of record or personal respect toward others. How unfortunate that someone could draw such a croud.

HOMEWORK: look up Cannon's record. He's more fiscally conservative than ALL of congress except 6 others. And more successful than ALL of them.

YORKTOWN: Don't blame Cannon for your civic laziness: You want to know what he has done or is doing? You would have already found out. It's all at the Library of Congress. You claim to want him to report to you and tell you himself: then go to his website. You believe your own complaint? Put up or shut up. It's all there for anyone who really wants to know. If that's your issue--problem solved now you can vote for Cannon!
My favorite quote ... | 1:52 p.m. June 11, 2008
"protecting these princeples should not be directed by politically vested special interests or former vice presidents"

This is in his response to the question about global warming. I find this hilarious because he just spent the entire previous question promoting nuclear energy. Anyone want to guess what his politically vested special interest in nuclear energy is?

He is just as corrupt as all those politically vested special interests he puts down. Instead of putting down Al Gore, maybe he should take notes. Even if you don't agree with Gore's positions on global warming, look what he's done in 8 years to bring attention to the subject.

Cannon's been in office for 12 years and hasn't made one improvement to the issues he claims to be so committed to: balancing the budget and illegal immigration. Quite frankly, even if Chaffetz isn't a shining star, I doubt he can do any worse than Cannon. Afterall, picking your nose for 12 straight years isn't that hard.
Deseret Dawg | 5:19 p.m. June 11, 2008
To BBKing: Jason Chaffetz does NOT advocate amnesty. Those illegals who would qualify for a work visa under his program would be deported from the United States at the expiration of the visa. No exceptions, no exclusions.

Try using the same definition of amnesty as everyone else.
BBKing | 8:50 p.m. June 11, 2008
Deseret Dawg, let me use the definition I have heard Jason say on several occassions; that his supporters have said for years.

If they don't have to go home first, it's amnesty.

So 20 million people are here illegally, they get Jason's visa and that isn't amnesty? Oh, they have to go home when it expires. I see. Sounds great but there is a problem with that as a definition, a brand new definition at that.

Even Ted Kennedy required them to go home when it was over. His did allow them to apply for citizenship but once the worker visa was expired they went home. In fact, pretty much every guest worker visa proposal I have ever read requires them to go home when they are done.

What Jason is proposing has already been proposed. And you folks have attacked it as amnesty.

The point is that Jason is inconsistent. When he needed right-wing delegates he proposed internment camps, whatever you want to call them.

He needs primary voters so now he's proposing a Guest Worker visa plan 10Xs larger and no where near as secure as Cannon's.

Jason is flip-flopping for votes. Sad but true.
Emily E. | 9:46 p.m. June 12, 2008
Cannon does say he supports or doesn't support things and then votes differently, but that's not my biggest problem. It's that he hasn't done anything! His voting record is okay, but he's not getting the problems solved. He's sponsoring legislation on car rentals and credit card transaction rates. Which I don't really care about. It's only lately that he's trying to get something done about energy. That's a little too late. We need someone who is proactive about getting things done. Cannon has had his time. It's time for someone else.
Go Jason | 5:24 p.m. June 18, 2008
Too late for Cannon, he had his chance and blew it. He seems to come at election time with all these ideas. Why wait till it's crisis time to react. Chris has had 6 terms, It's time to go to Mapleton and spend the money he stole from the Geneva retirement accounts.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

previousnext

Latest comments

Editorial: 10 years of TRAX

Sorry earlier I meant to say that tracks seems to travel at 35 miles an hour...

'Peter Frumhoff, the director of science and policy at the Union of...

The Non-BCS crowd ought to create their own title game...their own brand, and...

Letters: Democrats' ethics

That's the whole of your defense of GOP resistance to badly-needed ethics...

Your criticism should hardly be focused on Bennett alone. What about all the...

'Wired's Threat Level blog reported on November 20 that Gavin Schmidt, a...

The reality of climate change is supported by multiple lines of evidence and...

BYU professor remembered

I had the priviledge of staying in the LeBaron home on severl occasions as I...

Letters: Growing jobless rate

So the unemployment rate has dropped to "just" 10%, huh? I wonder what that...

Ahh for the love of money...what money can buy!!!

Advertisements