Reader comments
Change may protect forests

2 comments   |   Read story

Dave | 6:50 a.m. June 7, 2008
Gee! Access to our public lands and resources. What a terrible Idea.
Bob G | 7:31 a.m. June 7, 2008
Should it surprise anyone that the Bush cartell is more interested in money that posterity? Destroying a nation is not good news, look at what happened in Europe over time, it is now barren and sparsely productive. Just because it is there is not cause or justification to destroy any remenanents of nature. What is sad is that the greed for wealth is blind and powerful, until it runs out of its supply. The world needs trees and national forests, its one of the few things that help clean up and stablize the environment every one keeps whining about, like the ozone and what impact trees have in controlling it. Wealth should take a back seat in protecting our world and nation.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Advertisement
previousnext

Latest comments

Since we're having so much fun: If health care costs are causing so many...

5A teams best of decade

ok hunters 19 playoff apperances in 20 years is the best percentage just saying

BYU football recruit turning heads

Interesting experience, read the Harmon article, then the Times article, then...

No way hunter has more kids than Alta. Maybe Davis now with syacuse...

Y'all talk about Max like he is the incarnation of Steve Young, Ty Detmer and...

I live in Santa Clarita, and it is a "town" of about 250k people. This is a...

Thanks for the info, looks like that was a good game. I didn't follow much of...

Utah Fans need to start stuffing the ballot boxes... I know the West is...

So easy: It's a good moniker for you because your arguments are so easy to...

To Anonymous | 6:51 p.m. Socialism does not require individual ownership...

Advertisements
Advertisement