Comments about ‘Broadweave officials hit with tough questions’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large sodas...
- Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches
- Family at first sight: Girl with Down...
- Plane crash victims identified
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
31 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
25 - KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
21 - Utah woman adopted as baby faces...
18 - Vets heart Mitt: Romney enjoys big...
17 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
14






You can't have it both ways....if you want to get out and sell..and you find a willing buyer...REJOICE!!!
Even if Broadweave has problems (I hope they don't) Provo gets the system back and is better off than they are today as Broadweave will have paid 2 years of the bond and made investments into the network.
Provo you have a bite....set the hook and reel them in! Hats off to iProvo for getting such a high offer. Provo citizens win as they still have the fiber network and competition for Comcast/Qwest...and they have moved to privatize the asset as most have wanted!!!
As far as Pete Ashton...he does not want to make an offer to buy it...he just wants to get on the network. If he or anyone else things the offer is bad...nothing is stopping them from making a better offer before the council approve this great offer.
I'm sure if a better offer were made the administration and council would take the better offer...step right up at those that think Broadweave offer is not good!!! Put your money where your mouth is!!
As to the current service providers - they made it very clear in the meeting that MStar owed the entire $950 thousand. We learned in that meeting that it just isn't true that all of the service providers are behind on payments to Provo. One is. That makes a big difference.
Government getting snookered. Again!
"High offers" on failing projects scream out, Sure Defeat".
Particularly when the "buyer" puts no money into the deal.
Provo "borrowing money" to get paid? All of it . . . Really??? That means Provo's responsible for the repayment.
Broadweave is "assuming" that obligation? With a formal assumption agreement or does everyone simply hope Broadweave will magically find out how to generate cash from a proven failing (failed) operation?
Neat, the "buyer" owns it, can drive it into the ground, must be foreclosed upon for the "lender" (Provo??) to get it back and takes no financial risk since the principals thereof have no personal liability and the company is a pip-squeek.
That kinda' deal, I'd love to be in . . . as a "buyer".
Tell you what. Go borrow all you can against your new car. Get your cash in hand. Assign me the title and I promise I'll pay off your car loan. If I don't make any payments; just repossess the car and catch up on all the back payments. Then try to drive that wasted vehicle.
Congratulations Provo.
This financing deal is worse than the original iProvo rip-off idea.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments