Comments about ‘John B. Quigley: American forces do not need a presence in so many locations’

Return to article »

Published: Sunday, Feb. 12 2012 12:00 a.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Demosthenes
Rexburg, ID

We don't need military bases in Europe or the South Pacific. Close them all, and focus spending on realistic threats.

CLM
Draper, UT

I agree, Professor Quigley, we could do with less US military presence. A lot less. 1,000 US military bases in over 130 countries around the world is beyond excessive. Also of note, Quigley has posed extremely important geopolitical questions in this article, the answers (not to be found in mainstream media) which would reveal actual US strategy.

The United States is a de facto bankrupt nation. The reserve currency role of the dollar is being challenged. China and Russia are side-stepping the dollar, settling in bilateral currencies with their major trade partners. At the same time, the US is struggling to maintain its position as the worldâs lone Superpower. To preserve economic and military preeminence, Russia must be neutralized along with China and Iran. This is the end game.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments