Comments about ‘Even more daylight saving’

Return to article »

Published: Monday, Jan. 16 2012 12:00 a.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Mike Richards
South Jordan, Utah

Or, in Mr. Bernard's case, why not enter the courtroom and turn America back to a time when King George denied the people the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

LDS Liberal
Farmington, UT

Mike Richards | 7:38 a.m. Jan. 16, 2012
South Jordan, Utah
Or, in Mr. Bernard's case, why not enter the courtroom and turn America back to a time when King George denied the people the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

===================

I thought that's what ultra-far-right-wing-Conservatives were trying to do.

John Charity Spring
Back Home in Davis County, UT

The left wing extremists cannot leave this issue alone. As subversive as DST is, the left is not satisfied. The left is now proposing going even beyond DST.

some of the leading left wing extremists are now promoting a system in which we would have the same amount of daylight between 5:00 and 9:00 pmm each day. To accomplish this, the clock would be adjusted each day be approximately 71 seconds forward or back, depending on the time of year.

This illogical system would completely disrupt the economy and the general social structure. In addition, it would lead to greater crime, substance abuse, and deviant sexuality. Clearly, that is the goal--to cloak nefarious activities in a shroud of darkness.

bslack
Draper, UT

Once I realized that Mr. Brian Bernard wrote this opinion, I knew that I am in agreement with Daylight Savings. I have read the many opinions concerning this issues, but I have never seen Mr. Bernard represent anything good or in the best interest of people.

Hutterite
American Fork, UT

Left extremists? Deviant sexuality? Wow. I thought this was a discussion about whether or not we should change the clocks twice a year.

Earl
Sandy, UT

Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see the liberal/conservative controversy in Mr. Bernard's comment. It seems to me that all he's doing is mocking the belief that some have that if some is good, more is better. I've seen people of all ideologies behave that way. The comments so far remind me of constitutional judges who see points of law where others see none. In this case, I don't get the criticism.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments