Quantcast

Comments about ‘Teacher tenure at issue in improving education’

Return to article »

Published: Monday, Dec. 19 2011 11:42 p.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
CougarKeith
Roy, UT

Tenure is fine "IF", and that is a BIG IF! Certain standards are met! If they aren't, DUMP THEM!!! Teachers should never have JOB GUARENTEE, NOBODY SHOULD! Earn your keep or get out! Same with No Child Left Behind! The system is a JOKE! Kids who fall behind or are lazy should REPEAT GRADES!!! They should FAIL! It's that simple!!! Produce or don't advance, teach and have kids learn or GET FIRED! This can be measured through student testing and class averages on test scores! It's that simple!

My2Cents
Taylorsville, UT

Tenure should never be rated as better or more deserving in promotions or benefits. There is only one reason to ever consider tenure, in the event of a blanket RIF (reduction in force). We must give them some credit for being handicapped and locked in to their job for putting up with the corruption, deceptions, mismanagement of funds in the education system for 30-40 years of service.

The best thing to improve education is get government out of it, no more blackmail funding from government to control the class rooms in how eduction is taught, what is taught, and put it under the control of state laws. Abolish federal education funding. Education is not a right of an occupant of this country, it is a privilege of rights as a citizens that tax paying citizens should control and fund.

A good eduction comes from good baseline controls at local levels of government as it should be. A national education system under the control of government is indoctrination and socialist. And we have entered that domain with all the blackmail controls enacted by the government education funding system to include the NCLB failures creating a nationally controlled education system.

Ms Molli
Bountiful, Utah

I'm 100% in support of government or private business having a simple way to fire ineffective workers. Teachers have tried to convince the public for decades that they should be treated differently. Its time they are treated like any other member of the workforce if they are not doing their job.

my 2 cents worth
West Jordan, UT

Another thing to consider: tenured teachers (and indeed, many salaried industry and business workers) are often given yearly raises that reflect loyalty and/or good performance. With a 3-5 year contract, when budget cuts come around, the higher paid, experienced teachers will be let go. So yeah, let's implement this. Fewer people will want in, and you'll always have inexperienced, less knowledgeable instructors trying to educate the children.

jagfam
Kearns, UT

I have a great idea for improving student achievement and it as nothing to do with teachers. Parents. Parent involvement is the greatest indicator for how well a student will do. Numbers for parent Conferences are down and performance numbers are down. Is there a correlation there? Now I know there are some bad teachers out there, but blaming education alone won't help. Look in the mirror parents, are you really taking and doing your part in your children's education? Or is it easier to blame a teacher because billy can't read or write?

sisucas
San Bernardino, CA

Tenure is ridiculous. No other industry has tenure. I really don't understand how it makes sense. Next, teachers should get paid a lot more. 30,000 per year is ridiculous for somebody with a college degree. If we want to attract good people we need to pay them better. As for firing more experienced teachers who make more if budget cuts are necessary; we could easily write into legislation that when bedget cuts are necessary schools must cut teachers by level of performance and nothing more. Then you cut your less effective teachers first and the better ones will never have to worry, regardless of pay.

DN Subscriber
Cottonwood Heights, UT

This is a long overdue common sense fix to the problem of SOME teachers being ineffective. No longer will the teachers union protective policies defend the indefensible.

Teaching is a vitally important profession- for our children, not as a guaranteed job for teachers.

While no process for weeding out the bad teachers will be perfect, any will be better than the current system of making it (almost) impossible to ever fire any teacher.

The good teachers deserve our thanks and support, but the bad ones need to be weeded out immediately!

Rick for Truth
Provo, UT

By outright removal of tenure, you will destroy the education of Utah's students. You will put teachers, already underpaid and overworked, at the mercy of every administrator. They will become the servants and slaves to their every whim. Many great teachers will simply leave the profession or the state. It is okay to hold teachers accountable, but there must be a very defined path for firing, as well as for retention. Teachers have to deal with out of control students, and parents, accusations must be proven and not alleged. Many times a teacher is given a very low performing student, or a student who misses school. This can occur in the middle or end of the school year. Measuring change and growth in a students progress is more important than the average score at the end of the year.

Eliot
Santaquin, UT

The suggestion that during difficult economic times experienced teachers will be fired in order to balance budgets is very short sighted. Administrators, who do not have tenure, must also answer for the performance of their schools. If they fire their best teachers then their schools will surely suffer and they will lose their jobs as well. Senator Osmond's effort to draft a quality bill to address this very important issue is commendable.

EJM
Herriman, UT

Here is a reason why tenure is so important. When teachers are unfairly accused, and they are unfairly accused, then tenure protects them. When parents who have never come into a classroom to observe/volunteer/assist take little Timmy's word about the teacher..then tenure protects them. Every profession has due process. The federal government and federal laws protect against discrimination in the workplace so what is the big deal about tenure? There are rules in place in every school district that deal with removal/replacement of teachers when they are not doing their jobs. Administrators have the power and the responsibility to evaluate teachers (using in place guidelines established by school districts) and to remove them if they are not doing their jobs. If the administrator thinks it is too much work to go through the process then get rid of the administrator. But for those of you who want to think that the teacher's union is against this idea you are dead wrong. The UEA is in favor of having a quality teacher in place in every classroom. Just make certain that when you do decide to remove a teacher that there is proper justification.

Goet
Ogden, UT

Eliot: not shortsighted at all. It happens quite a bit. Teachers are fired for not following lock stock with the principal or just because of a whiny parent that didn't get their way.

Administrators would rather have a cheap teacher that does what they say than an expensive one, albeit highly effective, that doesn't bend to their every whim.

Gracie
Boise, ID

It looks as if a few good super men and women are truly on the way to save the day. It's long past time to get serious about corruption wherever it's found. Good teachers need support to do their work, unimpeded by stuck-on-stupid philosophies and policies that dumb down our students and the educational system generally.
Also, to continually blame parents for lack of better student performance is an unfair accusation a great deal of the time. Parents for generations have been shunted into nonpolicy-making positions, keeping them out of the way of determined progressiveand detrimentalpractices, not allowed to participate fully in fixing perceived problems. With so many two-earner families these days by sad necessity, there's only so much energy (and time to use it) to go around. As a teacher, I know my time with children is a sacred trust to help beleaguered parents achieve hopeful goals for their children.
This is a complicated situation requiring much consideration and cooperation from all sides. I'm glad to see a revival of serious attention to an inherently broken system.

collegestudent25
Cedar City, UT

I am a first year teacher that does not yet have tenure. I do not fear losing my job.

ClarkKent
Bountiful, Utah

Oh cry me a river some of you. PLEEEZZZZZ ... do you hear cops, firefighters, hospital employees, utility company workers, etc. crying for tenure and trying to use the scare tactics that some of you are arguing about for teachers. Get real here. I don't buy it and most of America doesn't buy it.

CHS 85
Sandy, UT

Name one school district in Utah that has "tenure."

Name one school district in Utah that doesn't have in place policies to terminate ineffective teachers that the school board (who is elected by the local constituency) agreed to in negotiations with their management and labor parties.

Name one administrator in Utah who does not have at his/her disposal the policies and procedure to deal with problem employees, that if followed can result in the termination of poor performing employees.

I'll wait.

Goet
Ogden, UT

Yet another anti-teacher article from DN based on false premises.

Utah does not have teacher tenure.

This entire article is bogus.

EJM
Herriman, UT

To CHS and Goet...I agree. The term "tenure" is probably misused here but in actuality, teachers do have it. You have to get caught with your hands in the cookie jar or being inappropriate with a student to get fired. With that said, yes...there are processes in place to remove teachers or at least encourage them to get out of the profession if they are not doing their jobs effectively enough. They are just not being utilized. Why not? As an educator who has seen enough lousy teaching (and witnessed some great teaching as well) it comes down to administrators who don't want the hassle. Sad to say.

Goet
Ogden, UT

collegestudent25:

You don't fear losing your job because you probably don't have multiple kids at home, a mortgage and multiple bill payments. You're not paying for kids in college or on a mission, nor are you worried about finding another low paying job elsewhere. Almost anything equals teacher starting pay.

You probably haven't been forced to work after school hours for no pay nor compensation with a threat of firing or a "trouble" mark on your records. You haven't been pink-slipped because of someone's buddy wanting your position. I have. You probably also have a supportive administrator (since they hired you just this year) and not a putz who dictates ridiculous things that hurt education and require extra, unpaid labor.

Don't worry. Your time will come.

My suggestion to you is to get out now, while you still can afford it.

My suggestion to all is to not get into teaching, and if you just must because it is your "dream", then don't stay in Utah.

That's a Utah teacher's honest view.

Chuck E. Racer
Lehi, UT

Even value-added scores, while better than just using the average score, are not accurate for measuring a teacher's effectiveness.

As a male elementary teacher, I regularly get dumped on with a bigger share of behavior problems, especially problem boys. One or two are OK, but when several are in the class, it makes the class much more difficult to progress for the others. Should I be blamed for this?!

The Utah Republican
Alpine, UT

Under current Utah law, tenure doesn't exist. New teachers are evaluated twice a year for three years. After that they're evaluated once a year. That's the law. Anyone who says otherwise is trying to sell something.

The Jordan District evaluation system uses multiple data points - dozens of indicators in multiple domains. The results are norm referenced, and low performing teachers lose their jobs. I've never seen an article on it.

Now here's the sad truth about the market for teachers. The Jordan District web-site currently lists nine unfilled full time teaching jobs that require highly qualified specialists, and serve at risk students. Unfortunately, the available pay doesn't meet the demand, and the classes are being taught by long term substitutes.

It seems reasonable to suggest that Tenure isn't the root cause of Utah's problem. It might be in some other place, but a thorough evaluation of the system currently in place points to other problems. I've been raised to expect that kind of fact finding and analysis from the Deseret News.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments